Introduction

Water birds prefer Korea as a stopover and wintering location because of the country’s favorable geographic conditions. It is reported that over 1,340,000 domestic water birds overwintered as of 2020 (National Institute of Biological Resources [NIBR], 2020). The spot-billed duck is the third most abundant species of ducks in Korea (NIBR, 2020). However, the spot-billed ducks peaked in 2000 and currently has 100,000 (NIBR, 2020). The spot-billed ducks prefer eating on farmland, despite their primary habitats being rivers, lakes, and reservoirs (Stafford et al., 2010). The average daily distance traveled by the spot-billed duck is 1.0±0.89 km, with a maximum of 23 km (Shin et al., 2016c). Factors such as food resources, the quantity of food, and human interference influence the migration routes of the spot-billed ducks (Davis & Afton, 2010; Kang et al., 2014; Shin et al., 2016a). Typically, the spot-billed duck spends the day resting in lakes and rivers and the night foraging in fields (Baldassarre & Bolen, 1994). The spot-billed duck has a sustainable breeding population in Korea. However, most research on the spot-billed ducks has been conducted during winter. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the home range and habitat use of spot-billed ducks in spring to protect and manage this species.

Materials and Methods

Study areas

The GPS-mobile phone-based telemetry (WT-300: 22 g) was attached to four locations for this study: Cheongmi stream in Anseong-si Gyeonggi-do, Dodang stream in Seosan-si Chungcheongnam-do, Yeonsan stream in Nonsan-si, and Baek stream in Sejong-si (Fig. 1). WT-300 was attached to six spot-billed ducks (three in Cheongmi streams and one each in Baek stream, Dodang stream, and Yeonsan stream). GPS acquired location information 12 times per day at 2 hours intervals. Data were analyzed from March 1 to May 31, 2022. Five (SB1, SB2, SB3, SB5, and SB6) of the six spot-billed ducks were tracked for 92 days, while one (SB4) was tracked for 58 days (Table 1).

Home range analysis

The analysis methods employed were the minimum convex polygon (MCP) and kernel density estimation (KDE). The home range determination strategy used a KDE method with three steps (90%, 70%, and 50%), where the MCP was set at 100%. By following the standard research method, we divided the calculated home range by 50% to determine the core habitat (Kauhala & Autttila, 2010).

Habitat use

The habitat classification was based on the land cover map (2020) issued by the Ministry of the Environment. The ecology of the spot-billed duck and the findings of previous studies were utilized to reclassify the study area into wetlands, rice fields, and other fields. The habitat utilization rate was categorized by time into all (24 hours), daytime (06:00-18:00 hours), and night time (20:00-04:00 hours). The average springtime sunrise and sunset were used to determine the day and night standards (Table 2).

Results

Home range analysis

The MCP analysis of six spot-billed ducks revealed an average home range of 70.28 km² (standard deviation [SD]=84.50, n=6). KDE showed that 90% of 9.96 km² (SD=9.25, n=6) and 70% of 4.91 km² (SD=5.10, n=6) were used, whereas core habitats (50%) was 2.66 km² (SD=2.60, n=6) (Fig. 2, Table 3).

Habitat utilization rate

Fig. 3Analysis of the habitat utilization rate of the spot-billed ducks demonstrated that wetlands (41.5%) had the highest utilization rate, followed by rice fields (35.7%) and others (20.8%). During the day, rice fields (40.0%) were used the most followed by wetlands (35.4%) and others (23.2%). However, wetlands (50.1%) were used the most at night, followed by rice fields (29.7%) and others (17.4%). Therefore, rice fields were used more during the day, whereas the wetlands were most utilized at night (Fig. 4).

Discussion

The winter home range (KDE 50%) of spot-billed ducks includes more urban than rural areas (Hwang et al., 2016). From these findings, we conclude that the spring home range (KDE 50%) of the spot-billed duck was similar to that of the rural areas and smaller than in urban areas (Hwang et al., 2016). Spot-billed ducks, like other duck species, show differences in mobility and home range depending on environmental and anthropogenic factors (Davis & Afton, 2010; Kang et al., 2014; Yoo et al., 2008). A limited home range in the spring allows for the provision of food and a hiding spot according to the grass Therefore, they used a small home range and avoided extensive travel during the spring.

Wetlands (41.5%) and rice fields (35.7%) were found to be highly utilized by spot-billed ducks. The utilization rate of rice fields was high during the day, whereas that of wetlands was high at night. This was comparable to the wintertime habitat usage rate in rural areas (Hwang et al., 2016). The spot-billed ducks typically inhabit wetlands and rice fields during spring and winter. Thus, wetlands and rice fields are important habitats for spot-billed ducks. Recently, spot-billed ducks were the third largest population of wintering ducks in Korea, but their numbers haves been declining continuously over the past decade (NIBR, 2020). This decrease in population is attributable to habitat changes (Shin et al., 2016b). Wetland conservation efforts are critical to ensure the survival of native species and maintain a steady domestic breeding population. Although this study analyzed the habitat and home range of spot-billed ducks in spring, further research is necessary. The findings of this study can serve as fundamental data to protect spot-billed ducks by managing two of their crucial springtime habitats, rice fields and wetlands.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Baldassarre, G.A., & Bolen, E.G. (1994) Waterfowl Ecology and Management New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc

2 

Davis, B.E., & Afton, A.D. (2010) Movement distances and habitat switching by female mallards wintering in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial valley Waterbirds, 33, 349-356 .

3 

Hwang, J.K., Shin, M.S., Kang, Y.M., Yoom, H.C., Choi, J.D., Jeong, W.S., et al. (2016) Interzonal comparative analysis of the wintering habitat of spot-billed duck (Anas poecilorhyncha) Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 30, 676-683 .

4 

Kang, T., Kim, D.H., Cho, H.J., Shin, Y.U., Lee, H.S., Suh, J.H., et al. (2014) Movements and home-range of Mallards by GPS-Mobile based Telementary (WT-200) in Korea Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 28, 642-649 .

5 

Kauhala, K., & Auttila, M. (2010) Estimating habitat selection of badgers - a test between different methods Folia Zoologica, 59, 16-25 .

6 

Kim, H.J., Lee, J.Y., Park, J.Y., Hur, W.H., Nam, H.K., Hwang, J.W., et al. (2020) 2019-2020 Winter Waterbird Census of Korea Incheon: National Institute of Biological Resources

7 

Shin, Y.U., Shin, M.S., Lee, H.S., Han, S.W., Jung, S.M., & Oh, H.S. (2016a) A study on spot-billed ducks' daily habitat use pattern during wintering period in Korea Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 30, 328-334 .

8 

Shin, Y.U., Shin, M.S., Lee, H.S., Kang, Y.M., Jeong, W.S., Choi, J.D., et al. (2016b) Home-range of mallard and spot-billed duck in Korea Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 30, 165-172 .

9 

Shin, Y.U., Shin, M.S., Lee, H.S., Kang, Y.M., Moon, O.K., Park, H.S., et al. (2016c) Study for habitat usage of spot-billed duck in Korea, using GPS-Mobile telemetry (WT-200) Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 30, 146-154 .

10 

Stafford, J.D., Kaminski, R.M., & Reinecke, K.J. (2010) Avian foods, foraging and habitat conservation in world rice fields Waterbirds, 33, 133-150 .

11 

Yoo, S.H., Kim, I.K., Kang, T.H., Yu, J.P., Lee, S.W., & Lee, H.S. (2008) Wintering bird community in Cheonsu bay and the relationship with food resources Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 22, 301-308 .

Figures and Tables
Fig. 1

Study areas.

pnie-3-4-199-f1.jpg
Fig. 2

Spot-billed duck (Anas poecilorhyncha) Home range (dotted line is minimum convex polygon and contours represent 90, 70, 50% from outside line, respectively).

pnie-3-4-199-f2.jpg
Fig. 3

Percentage of total habitat use during the tracking period.

pnie-3-4-199-f3.jpg
Fig. 4

Day and night comparison of habitat used.

pnie-3-4-199-f4.jpg
Table 1

Summary information of 6 spot-billed ducks (Anas poecilorhyncha)

Study areas No Weight (g) Tracking period No. of GPS
fixed
GPS fixed
time/day
Battery
lifespan
Cheongmicheon SB1 1,310 2022.03.01-2022.05.31 1,104 12 92
Cheongmicheon SB2 1,280 2022.03.01-2022.05.31 1,104 12 92
Cheongmicheon SB3 1,205 2022.03.01-2022.05.31 1,104 12 92
Dodangcheon SB4 1,070 2022.03.01-2022.04.27 693 12 58
Yeonsancheon SB5 1,340 2022.03.01-2022.05.31 1,104 12 92
Baekcheon SB6 1,045 2022.03.01-2022.05.31 1,102 12 92
Table 2

Land coverage map (middle classification) reclassification system

Reclassification Code Middle classification
Wetland 510 Inland wetlands
520 Coastal wetlands
710 Inland waters
720 Sea water
Rice field 210 Rice field
Field 220 Field
Others 110 Residential area
120 Industrial area
130 Commercial area
140 Culture·Athletic
Recreation area
150 Traffic area
160 Public facilities area
230 Facility cultivation area
240 Orchard
250 Other cultivated land
310 Hardwood forest
320 Coniferous forest
330 Mixed forest
410 Natural grassland
420 Artificial grassland
610 Nature bare land
620 Artificiality bare land
Table 3

Home range estimations of spot-billed ducks (Anas poecilorhyncha) by MCP and KDE

Study areas No MCP (km2) KDE (km2)

90% 70% 50%
Cheongmicheon SB1 15.04 7.90 3.75 2.07
Cheongmicheon SB2 48.60 4.98 2.17 1.29
Cheongmicheon SB3 34.03 10.21 4.67 2.74
Dodangcheon SB4 239.58 6.66 3.26 1.82
Yeonsancheon SB5 24.51 2.03 0.70 0.35
Baekcheon SB6 59.94 27.99 14.94 7.72
Average 70.28 9.96 4.91 2.66
Standard deviation 84.50 9.25 5.10 2.60