Transnational Studies and Attempts at Inclusivity

This paper provides comments on Janus Nolasco’s paper and the role that transnational or transpacific studies can play in overcoming the division between Philippine Studies (area studies) and Filipino-American scholarship. It draws attention to the fact that the crossing of localities and boundaries is always historically grounded and that the historical contexts in which Filipino diasporic communities are located vary one from another. It also considers the antecedents of more inclusive approaches to understanding the past and the present, and historical agency.

keywords: translocalities, transnational studies, Philippine Studies, Filipino-American scholarship, historical context, agency

Reference

1.

California State Assembly Democratic Caucus. Governor Signs Bonta’s Filipino American Farm Worker Bill, AB 123. 2013. http://asmdc.org/members/a18/news-room/press-releases/governor-signs-bonta-s-filipino-american-farm-worker-bill-a b-123. (Accessed September 01, 2014).

2.

Cheney, Lynne V. 1994. The End of History. The Wall Street Journal, 20 October 1994.

3.

Febvre, Lucien and François Crouzet. 1951. International Origins of a National Culture: Experimental Materials for a History of France. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001423/142305eb.p df. (Accessed August 26, 2015).

4.

Hunt, Lynn. 2014. Writing History in the Global Era. New York:Norton & Company, Inc.

5.

Nash, Gary B., Charlotte Antoinette Crabtree, and Ross E. Dunn. 1997. History on Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past. New York: A. A. Knopf.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.10 No.2

Transnational Studies and Attempts at Inclusivity

Abstract

Reference