바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Area Studies, History and the Anthropocene

Abstract

The term Anthropocene encapsulates the idea that the human impact on earth has already reached the level of a geological force with catastrophic consequences, such as global warming or climate change. The envisioning of an apocalyptic future of the possible demise of the human race is central to this idea. This paper seeks to explore the implications of the Anthropocene on the very idea of area studies. Does the planetary scope of the Anthropocenic condition, and the concerted effort in the global scale in the need to address it, mean the end of area studies, which is premised on a particularity of an area? Is a posthumanist history feasible? If yes, how can it really help address the problem? Or, it will merely muddle the issues?

keywords
Anthropocene, Area Studies, Environment, Climate Change, Humanism, Post-humanist History

Reference

1.

Boomgaard, Peter. 2007. A World of Water: Rain, Rivers and Seas in Southeast Asian Histories. Brill.

2.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2):197–222.

3.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2015. The Human Condition in the Anthropocene: Tanner Lecture on Human Values. https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Chakrabarty%20manuscript.pdf (Accessed March 12, 2019)

4.

Chou, Cynthia. 2010. The Orang Suku Laut of Riau, Indonesia:The Inalienable Gift of Territory. London ; New York:Routledge.

5.

Chou, Cynthia. 2016. The Water World of the Orang Suku Laut in Southeast Asia. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 4(2):265–282.

6.

Crutzen, Paul J. 2002. Geology of Mankind. Nature 415(6867):23.

7.

Emmett, Robert and Thomas Lekan. 2016. Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s ‘Four Theses.’ RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society (2). http://www.environmentandsociety.org/sites/default/files/2016_i2_final.pdf (Accessed April 1, 2019)

8.

Ferrando, Francesca. 2016. Humans Have Always Been Posthuman:A Spiritual Genealogy of Posthumanism. Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures. Debashish Banerji and Makarand Paranjape, eds. 243–256. New Delhi: Springer India.

9.

Hamilton, Clive. 2016. The Anthropocene as Rupture. The Anthropocene Review, 3(2): 93–106.

10.

Haraway, Donna. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities, 6:159–165.

11.

Haraway, Donna, Noboru Ishikawa, Scott F. Gilbert, KennethOlwig, Anna L. Tsing, and Nils Bubandt. 2016. Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene. Ethnos, 81(3): 535–564.

12.

Herbrechter, Stefan. 2013. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

13.

Hudson, Mark J. 2014. Placing Asia in the Anthropocene:Histories, Vulnerabilities, Responses. The Journal of Asian Studies, 73(4): 941–962.

14.

Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why We Disagree About Climate Change:Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Latour, Bruno. 2017. Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene: A Personal View of What Is to Be Studied. The Anthropology of Sustainability. Marc Brightman and Jerome Lewis, eds. 35–49. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

16.

Lidskog, Rolf and Claire Waterton. 2016. Anthropocene – A Cautious Welcome from Environmental Sociology? Environmental Sociology, 2(4): 395–406.

17.

Malm, Andreas and Alf Hornborg. 2014. The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1): 62–69.

18.

McNeill, John Robert and Peter Engelke. 2014. The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene Since 1945. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

19.

Menely, Tobias and Jesse Oak Taylor, eds. 2017. Anthropocene Reading: Literary History in Geologic Times. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

20.

Mignolo, Walter. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity:Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.

21.

Moore, Jason W. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso.

22.

Moore, Jason W. ed. 2016a. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: Kairos PM Press.

23.

Moore, Jason W. 2016b. Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Jason W. Moore, ed. 1-13. Oakland, CA: Kairos PM Press.

24.

Morrison, Kathleen. 2015. Provincializing the Anthropocene. Seminar Web Edition. http://www.india-seminar.com/2015/673/673_kathleen_morrison.htm. (Accessed April 15, 2019).

25.

Oakeshott, Michael. 1983. On History and Other Essays. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.

26.

Pepperell, Robert. 2003. The Posthuman Condition: Consciousness Beyond the Brain. Bristol: Intellect.

27.

Polt, Richard F. H. 1999. Heidegger: An Introduction. Ithaca, N.Y:Cornell University Press.

28.

Polt, Richard F. H. and Jon Wittrock, eds. 2018. The Task of Philosophy in the Anthropocene: Axial Echoes in Global Space. London New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

29.

Powell, James Lawrence. 2012. The Inquisition of Climate Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

30.

Rudiak-Gould, Peter. 2015. The Social Life of Blame in the Anthropocene. Environment and Society 6(1): 48-65.

31.

Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2017. Why the Anthropocene Has No History: Facing the Unprecedented. The Anthropocene Review 4(3):239–245.

32.

Smith, Bruce D. and Melinda A. Zeder. 2013. The Onset of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene, 4:8–13.

33.

Steffen, Will, Paul J. Crutzen, and John R. McNeill. 2007. The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature? Ambio 36(8):614–621.

34.

Szanton, David L. 2004. Introduction: The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States. Pp. 1–33. Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. D. L. Szanton, ed. 1-33. Berkeley: University of California Press.

35.

Thompson, Eric C. 2013. In Defence of Southeast Asia: A Case for Methodological Regionalism. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 1(2):281–302.

36.

White, Hayden V. 2014. The Practical Past. Evanston, Illinois:Northwestern University Press.

37.

Zalasiewicz, Jan, Colin N. Waters, Mark Williams, Anthony D. Barnosky, Alejandro Cearreta, Paul Crutzen, Erle Ellis, Michael A. Ellis, Ian J. Fairchild, Jacques Grinevald, Peter K. Haff, Irka Hajdas, Reinhold Leinfelder, John McNeill, Eric O. Odada, Clément Poirier, Daniel Richter, Will Steffen, Colin Summerhayes, James P. M. Syvitski, Davor Vidas, Michael Wagreich, Scott L. Wing, Alexander P. Wolfe, Zhisheng An, and Naomi Oreskes. 2015. When Did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level Is Stratigraphically Optimal. Quaternary International, 383:196–203.

logo