open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 2092-738X
With natural resources—terrestrial or coastal—fastly diminishing, governments are now resorting to biodiversity conservation, fast-tracking the introduction of new legislations, as well as the amendment of existing ones, and laying out programs that interpret existing practices and research agendas. This paper examines how biodiversity conservation—in addition to eco-tourism—has become an important symbol of the modernizing state of Sabah, Malaysia. It further examines the effects of biodiversity conservation on state and community management of natural resources, with particular reference to the management of natural resources by the indigenous peoples of Sabah. Citing case studies and focusing on a forest community at Kiau Nuluh, in the district of Kota Belud, Sabah, this paper evaluates strategies used by indigenous groups to maintain access and control over the management of natural resources—and by implication to livelihoods—via ecotourism, making creative alliances with non-government organisations as well as forging cooperation with government agencies which act as custodians of these resources. For a majority of indigenous groups however, the practice of biodiversity conservation has meant reduced and controlled access to natural resources, considering the fundamental issue of the lack of security of tenure to the land claimed under customary rights. New initiatives at recognizing Indigenous and Community Conserved Areas (ICCAs) by international conservation groups provide a means for tenure recognition, for a price, of course. The recognition of ICCAs also faces obstacles arising from developmentalist ideology which upholds that forests are valuable only when converted to other land use, and not left to stand for their intrinsic value.
Alim Buin n.d. Biological Diversity Consergation in Sabah and Its Action Plan. Retrieved from: http:seaip.narlabs.org.tw/upload/content_file/529ef5c2e9a64.pdf. (Accessed May 19, 2014).
Cleary, M.C. 1992. Plantation agriculture and the formulation of native land rights in British North Borneo c. 1880-1930. The Geographical Journal, 158(2): 170-181,
Dudley, N. (ed). 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland.
Holmes, G. and Brockington, D. 2013. Protected areas what people say about well being. Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Alleviation, Exploring the Evidence. Dilys Roe, Joana Eliot, Chris Sandbrook and Matt Walpole. Chichester, U.K.: Willey Blackwell.
Majid Cooke, Fadzilah and Justine Vaz. 2011. A Review of Indigenous and Community-Conserved Areas in Sabah. Kota Kinabalu: Global Diversity Foundation for the Sabah Biodiversity Centre, Bornean Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Project II.
Majid Cooke, Fadzilah and Toh Su Mei. 2012. Indigenous peoples and access to customary Lands: A question of rights in contemporary Sabah. A report submitted to the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia, as part of the National Inquiry into the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Peluso, Nancy Lee and Peter Vandergest. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Asian Studies, 60(3): 761-812.
Sabah Parks. 2006. Crocker Range Management Plan. Sabah Biodiversity Ecosystems Conservation Programme Report, Kota Kinabalu.
Vaz, Justine and Agnes Agama. 2013. Seeking synergy between community and state based governance for biodiversity conservation: the roel of ICCAs in Sabah, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 54(2): 141-157.
West, Paige, James Igoe and Dan Brockington. 2006. Parks and People: The Social Impact of Protected Areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35:231-277.
Yani Saloh. 2013. Equitable efforts to save the world’s forests: Don’t put the burden on the poor: Commentary by climate change advisor to Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. Mongabay online: at http://news.mongabay.com/2013/1118-saloh-commentary-indonesia.html?(Accessed November 21, 2013).