바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The Khmer Rouge Genocide Trial and the Marcos Human Rights Victims: the Quest for Justice and Reparations

Abstract

Just how does one make sense of the genocide perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge during its rule in the 70’s and the numerous human rights violations in the Philippines during the Marcos period? Like the conflicts that have marked human history at the close of the 20th century, Southeast Asia is no exception, similar to the many attempts to come to terms with the past and put to account wrongdoers worldwide. The paper is an attempt to historicize these two seemingly unrelated events and analyze them from the synoptic frameworks of transitional justice and reparations. Similar to the experiences faced by many societies transitioning towards democratic rule, notably in Latin America, the dilemma of whether to pursue justice or preserve the peace and the newfound status quo has characterized the length at which justice had eluded the victims in Cambodia and the Philippines. Yet, no matter what the limits are in pursuing accountability, or these so called historical injustices, closure is still achievable. The paper would like to argue that closure is possible when one, all or a combination of the following, depending on the gravity of the crime, is present—truth-telling, prosecution for the crimes committed, and a grant of compensation.

keywords
Khmer Rouge, Marcos human rights victims, reparations, human rights in Southeast Asia, history and closure, amending historical injustices

Reference

1.

Alfonsin, Raul. 1993. `Never Again’ in Argentina. Journal of Democracy. 4(1): 14-19.

2.

Arditti, Rita. 2005. Searching for Life: The Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo and the Disappeared Children of Argentina. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

3.

Arendt, Hanna. 1962. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4.

Barkan, Eleazar. 2000. The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York and London: W.W. Norton.

5.

Bourget, Marie Noelle, Lucette Valimsi and Nathan Wachtel, eds. 1990. Between Memory and History. Char, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Press.

6.

Brooks, Roy L. 2003. Reflections on Reparations. Politics and the Past: On Repairing Historical Injustices. John Torpey, ed. 68-79. Boulder, Lanham, London and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

7.

Casiple, Ramon C. 2000. Waiting for Justice in the Marcos Litigation. Carnegie Council Human Rights Dialogue. 2(2). http://www.cceia.org/resources/publications/dialogue/2-02/articles/613html. (Accessed 21 March 2015).

8.

Casiple, Ramon. 1999. Justice: Light at the End of the Marcosian Tunnel. Human Rights Forum, 8 (2): 54-66.

9.

Casiple, Ramon. 1997. Reflections on the Human Rights Movement. Human Rights Forum, 6 (2):23-30.

10.

Coronel, Sheila et.al. 1990. Kudeta: The Challenge to Philippine Democracy. Manila: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism and Photojournalist’ Guild of the Philippines.

11.

De Kok, Devin. 1998. Cracked Heirlooms. Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa. Sarah Nutall and Carli Coetze eds. 221-234. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

12.

Hamber, Brandon and Richard Wilson. 2003. Symbolic Closure through Memory, Reparation and Revenge in Post-Conflict Societies. The Role of Memory in Ethnic Conflict. E. Cairns and M. Roe, eds. 144-168. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

13.

Hayner, Priscilla. 2001. Fifteen Truth Commissions, 1974-1994: A Comparative Study. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. Priscilla Hayner, ed. Annex E. New York and London: Routledge.

14.

Heder, Stephen. 2012. The Personal Jurisdiction of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia as Regards Khmer Rouge `Senior Leaders’ and Others `Most Responsible’ for Khmer Rouge Crimes: A History and Recent Developments. http://www.cambodiatribunal.org/assets/pdf/reports/Final%20Revised%20Heder%20Personal%20Jurisdiction%20Review.120426.pdf. (Accessed 15 April 2015).

15.

Hesse, Carla and Robert Post. 1999. Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia. New York: Zone Books.

16.

Ignatieff, Michael. 2001. The Rights Revolution. Toronto: Asensi.

17.

Kaser, Thomas. 1994a. Did Marcos torture or kill thousands? Hawaii Star Bulletin. 9 September, 1&2.

18.

Kieran, Williams, Brigid Fowler and Aleks Szczerbiak. 2005. Explaining Lustration in Central Europe: A `Post-communist Politics’ Approach. Democratization, 12(1): 89-105.

19.

Kiernan, Ben. 1992. The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power and Genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, 1975-1979. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

20.

Lynch, David J. 2005. Cambodians Hope Justice will Close Dark Chapter. USA Today, 20 March: 1&4.

21.

Mamdani, Mahmood. 2001. “A Diminished Truth.” After the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Reflections on Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Wilmot, James and Linda van de Vijner eds. 143-188. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

22.

Mascarenhas, Tomas Bril. 2005. House of Horror. New Internationalist. December: 10-11.

23.

Mc Evers, Kelly. 2000. Price of Justice. Far Eastern Economic Review. 17 February: 27.

24.

Mendez, Juan E. 1999. In Defense of Transitional Justice. Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. James McAdams, ed. 3-28. Notre Dame, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

25.

Orendain, Joan. 1992. The Long, Torturous Road to Honolulu. Sunday Inquirer Magazine. 11 October. 5,6,8,10,11.

26.

Philips, Ruth B. and Elizabeth Johnson. 2003. Negotiating New Relationships: Canadian Museums, First Nations and Cultural Property. Politics and the Past: On Repairing Historical Injustices. Torpey, ed. 149-67. Boulder, Lanham, New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

27.

Ramirez, Ma. Glenda R. 2001. Twice Victimized: The Marcos Human Rights Litigation Revisited. Human Rights Forum, 10(2): 56-68.

28.

Ratner, Steven and Jason Abrams. 1997. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

29.

Robertson, Geoffrey. 2000. Crimes against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice. New York: New Press.

30.

Ryan, Tim. 1992. Nun: Torture `routine’ under Marcos. Hawaii Star Bulletin. 11 September, 4.

31.

Scheffer, David. 2015. What Has Been `Extraordinary’ About International Justice in Cambodia. http://www.cambodiatribunal.org/category/commentary/expert-commentary/. (Accessed March 27, 2015).

32.

Simpson, Graeme. 1999. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Some Lessons for Societies in Transition. Johannesburg: Center for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation.

33.

Smith, Kathleen E. 1996. Remembering Stalin’s Victims: Popular Memory and the End of the USSR. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

34.

Sriram, Chandra Lekha. 2004. Confronting Past Human Rights Violations: Justice versus Peace in Times of Transitions. London and New York: Frank Cass.

35.

Tavuchis, Nicholas. 1991. Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

36.

Thion, Serge. 1993. Watching Cambodia: Ten Paths to Enter the Cambodian Tangle. Bangkok and Cheney: White Lotus. Chap. 4 - The Cambodian Idea of a Revolution.

37.

Thomas Kaser. 1994b. Marcos trial hears litany of torture. Hawaii Star Bulletin. 14 September. 1&4.

38.

Torpey, John. 2003. Politics and the Past: On Repairing Historical Injustices. Boulder, Lanham, New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

39.

Torpey, John. 2001. Making Whole What Has Been Smashed: Reflections on Reparations. Journal of Modern History. 73(1): 335-47.

40.

Vickery, Michael. 1984. Cambodia: 1975-1982. Boston: South End Press.

41.

O’Donnell, Guillermo, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.

42.

Mc Adams, James, ed. 1997. Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies. Notre Dame, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

43.

Teitel, Ruti. 2000. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

44.

Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Boston: John Hopkins University Press.

logo