바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Positive integration of the franchise system: A new perspective on leadership, followership, trust and group efficacy

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2011, v.1 no.1, pp.5-8


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study has been conducted by focusing franchisor’s leadership style, franchisee’s followership, group-efficacy and their trust in order to achieve positive integration of the franchise system. The key results of empirical examination on the moderating effect of group-efficacy and trust between leadership style proposed by Path-Goal Theory and followership has been found as follows. First, franchisors should be showed their leadership style to fit their mutual business situation. Second, Franchisors and franchisees will be found many ways to increase level of franchisee’s group-efficacy. Third, Franchisors will be obtained trust from their own franchisees. These efforts will be given high level of franchisees’ trust and group-efficacy. As a result, positive integration of the franchise system will both enhance their competitiveness.

keywords
Franchise system, franchisor, franchisee, leadership style, followership

Reference

1.

Coase, R. H. (1937), “The nature of the firm”, Economica, 4(November), 386-405.

2.

Dowbey, H. K., Sehridan, J. E. & Slocum JR, J. W (1975), “Analysis of relationships among leader behavior, subordinate job performance and satisfaction: A path-Goal Approach”, The Academy of Management Journal, 18(2)(Jun), 253-262.

3.

Gibbard, G. & Hartman, J. (1973), “The Oedipal paradigm in group development: A clinical and empirical study”, Small Group Behavior, 4(3), 305-349.

4.

House, R. (1971), “A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338.

5.

House, R. J. & Mitchell, T.R. (1974), “Path-goal theory of leadership”. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3,81-97.

6.

Indvik, J. (1985), A path-goal theory investigation of superior subordinate relationships, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

7.

Kaufmann, P.J. & Dant, R. P. (1998), “Franchising and the Domain of Entrepreneurship Research”, Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 5-16.

8.

Kelley, R. E. (2008), Rethinking followership. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. C. Bligh, & M Uhl-Bein (Eds), Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of Fames R.Meindl (pp.5-15). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

9.

Klein, B. (1980), “Transactions cost determinants of “unfair” contractual arrangements”, American Economic Review (May): 356-62.

10.

Lafontaine, F. (1992), “Agency theory and franchising: some empirical results”, RAND Journal of Economics, 13(2), 263-282.

11.

Lewicki, R. J. & Bunker, B. (1996), Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In: Kramer, T., Tyler, T. (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 114-139.

12.

Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J. & Thomas, J. B. (1995), “Efficacy-performance spirals: A multi-level perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.

13.

Lutz, N. A.(1995), “Ownership rights and incentives in franchising”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 2(1-2), 103-131.

14.

Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R. & Zaltman, G. (1993), “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 81-101.

15.

Morgan, R. & Hunt, S. D. (1994), “The commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 20-38.

16.

Northouse, P. G. (1974), Leadership Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications,127-149.

17.

Norton, S. W. (1988), “An Empirical Look at Franchising as an Organizational Form”, Journal of Business, 61(2), 197-218.

18.

Riggs, M. L., & Knight, P.A. (1994), “The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes : A causal model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 755-766.

19.

Rubin, P. (1978), The Theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract, Journal of Law and Economic, 21 (April), 223-233.

20.

Song, G.W., & Shim, W. S. (2007), “A Study on The Relationship Between Mentoring Functions and Organizational Effectiveness: Moderating Effect of Followership”, The Korean Journal for Human Resource Development, 9(1), 77-95.

21.

Tuckman, B. W (1965), “Developmental sequence in small groups”, Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.

22.

Vernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (May), 190-207.

23.

Yang, H.C., & Lee, Y. C (2010), “An Empirical Study in Relationship between Franchisor’s Leadership Behavior Style and Commitment by Focusing Moderating Effect of Franchisee’s Self-efficacy”, Journal of Channel and Retailing, 15(1), 49-65.

Asian Journal of Business Environment