바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Network Perspectives in Innovation Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2021, v.11 no.1, pp.27-37

Seung-Yoon RHEE (Hongik University)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to provide a balanced understanding of the structural conditions and social processes involved in the creation and diffusion of innovation. Research design, data and methodology: Drawing on organizational and economic sociology and strategic management literature, this article offers a conceptual framework that highlights the two dimensions of network structures: the vertical dimension focusing on power and legitimacy vs. the horizontal dimension highlighting information value. By organizing the literature on the functions and consequences of network, this paper advances a theoretical perspective in understanding the vast array of empirical studies on innovation involving network analysis. Results: Using the proposed framework, this article explains how the mechanisms of power, legitimacy, and information value work together with social structural factors, thus enriching our understanding of innovation. This study reveals that the information mechanism (horizontal dimension) has been most important in innovation creation and diffusion, and that trust, credibility, and legitimacy are operative in innovation diffusion. Conclusions: This paper contributes to the literature by responding to calls to extend existing frameworks to better account for the dynamics between innovation and network. In addition, this article highlights how conceptualizing innovation within the horizontal-vertical dimensions of network structures, creates new opportunities for future research.

keywords
Network, Innovation, Power, Legitimacy, Information

Reference

1.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.

2.

Amchang, C., & Song, S. H. (2018). Designing a distribution network for faster delivery of online retailing: A case study in Bangkok, Thailand. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(5), 25-35.

3.

Aujirpongpan, S., & Hareebin, Y. (2020). The effect of strategic intuition, business analytic, networking capabilities and dynamic strategy on innovation performance: The empirical study Thai Processed Food Exporters. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 259-268.

4.

Azis, P., & Amir, M. T. (2020). Examining the intrapreneurship drivers and strategy: Case study of property services in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 169-179.

5.

Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1991). Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 279-309.

6.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

7.

Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113-120.

8.

Bothner, M. S. (2003). Competition and social influence: The diffusion of the sixth-generation processor in the global computer industry. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1175-1210.

9.

Bothner, M. S., Godart, F. C., & Lee, W. (2009). What is social status? Comparisons and contrasts with cognate concepts. Unpublished working paper.

10.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1943). A constant frame of reference for sociometric research. Sociometry, 6(4), 363-397.

11.

Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action: network models of social structure, perception, and action. New York: Academic Press.

12.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.

14.

Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: a closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167-199.

16.

Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702-734.

17.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.

18.

Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: a diffusion study. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co.

19.

Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.

20.

Cook, K. S., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (1992). Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1), 109-127.

21.

Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 583-613.

22.

Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 301-326.

23.

Davis, G. F. (2005). Firms and environments. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (2nd ed.) (pp. 478-502). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

24.

Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 26, 31–41.

25.

Emerson, R. (1964). Power-dependence relations: two experiments. Sociometry, 27, 282–298.

26.

Emerson, R. (1972a). Exchange theory, part I: a psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & Anderson, B. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38-57). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

27.

Emerson, R. (1972b). Exchange theory, part II: exchange relations, exchange networks, and groups as exchange systems. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & Anderson, B. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 58-87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

28.

Emerson, R. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: sociological perspectives (pp. 30-65). New York: Basic Books.

29.

Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.

30.

Fajar, M. (2020). Fair competition: The concept of regulation in the sharing economy. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(11), 637-645.

31.

Fernandez, R. M., & McAdam, D. (1988). Social networks and social movements: multiorganizational fields and recruitment to Mississippi Freedom Summer. Sociological Forum, 3(3), 357-382.

32.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

33.

Fleming, L. (2002). Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: the story of Hewlett‐Packard's thermal ink‐jet. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(5), 1059-1084.

34.

Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 443-475.

35.

Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). Sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 105-128.

36.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–80.

37.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

38.

Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 33-50.

39.

Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 619–652.

40.

Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32-69.

41.

Haghi, S. (2013). SWOT analysis for Iran's national innovation system based on Norwegian and Korean experiences. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 4(2), 21-30.

42.

Han, S. S., & Yim, D. S. (2018). Path dependence in industry-university cooperation: In terms of industry's voluntary participation. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(3), 45-56.

43.

Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.

44.

Hedström, P., Sandell, R., & Stern, C. (2000). Mesolevel networks and the diffusion of social movements: the case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party. American Journal of Sociology, 106(1), 145-172.

45.

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behaviour: its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.

46.

Ingram, P., & Rao, H. (2004). Store wars: the enactment and repeal of anti-chain-store legislation in America. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 446-487.

47.

Jensen, M. (2003). The role of network resources in market entry: commercial banks' entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(3), 466-497.

48.

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, Il: Free Press.

49.

Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342-369.

50.

Kogut, B., & Walker, G. (2001). The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66, 317-335.

51.

Laumann, E. O., Knoke, D., & Kim, Y. H. (1985). An organizational approach to state policy formation: a comparative study of energy and health domains. American Sociological Review, 50, 1-19.

52.

Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.

53.

Li, Y., & Li, H. (2017). Research on core competence of cultural industry in Korea. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 7(2), 17-20.

54.

Lounsbury, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2002). Social structure and organizations revisited. In M. Lounsbury & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 3-36). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.

55.

Macy, M. W. (1990). Learning theory and the logic of critical mass. American Sociological Review, 55, 809-826.

56.

Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.

57.

Martin, J. L. (2009). Social structures. NJ: Princeton University Press.

58.

Mizruchi, M. S. (1990). Cohesion, structural equivalence, and similarity of behavior: an approach to the study of corporate political power. Sociological Theory, 8, 16-32.

59.

Mizruchi, M. S., & Marquis, C. (2006). Egocentric, sociocentric, or dyadic?: identifying the appropriate level of analysis in the study of organizational networks. Social Networks, 28(3), 187-208.

60.

Molm, L. D. (1989). Punishment power: a balancing process in power-dependence relations. American Journal of Sociology, 94(6), 1392-1418.

61.

Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? Beacon, NY: Beacon House.

62.

Nadel, S. F. (1957). The theory of social structure. London: Cohen & West.

63.

Newman, M. E. (2000). Models of the small world: a review. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101, 819-841.

64.

Padgett, J. F., & McLean, P. D. (2006). Organizational invention and elite transformation: the birth of partnership systems in Renaissance Florence. American Journal of Sociology, 111(5), 1463-1568.

65.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

66.

Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829-872.

67.

Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 33-60.

68.

Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. (1995). A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1224-1260.

69.

Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

70.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 116-145.

71.

Rauch, J. E., & Casella, A. (2001). Networks and markets. New York: Russell Sage.

72.

Reagans, R. E., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2008). Why knowledge does not equal power: the network redundancy trade-off. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5), 903-944.

73.

Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267.

74.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

75.

Seo, D. S., & Kim, D. H. (2018). The innovation diffusion and neighbors in the 4th wave through Dubai-city. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(12), 55-61.

76.

Seo, D. S. (2015). E-Strategy between European and Korean innovative business channels in post-new normal era. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 5(4), 59-66.

77.

Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387-394.

78.

Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546-1588.

79.

Smith-Doerr, L., & Powell, W. W. (2005). Networks and economic life. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (pp. 379-402). NJ: Princeton University Press.

80.

Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 993-1027

81.

Stark, D., & Vedres, B. (2006). Social times of network spaces: network sequences and foreign investment in Hungary. American Journal of Sociology, 111(5), 1367-1411.

82.

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally & Company.

83.

Strang, D., & Macy, M. W. (2001). In search of excellence: fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 147-182.

84.

Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 668-698.

85.

Stuart, T. E., & Sorenson, O. (2005). Social networks and entrepreneurship. In S. Alvarez, R. Agrawal, & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 233-252). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

86.

Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144.

87.

Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447-504.

88.

Van den Bulte, C., & Lilien, G. L. (2001). Medical innovation revisited: social contagion versus marketing effort. American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1409-1435.

89.

Vu, H. M. (2020). A review of dynamic capabilities, innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial capabilities and their consequences. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 485-494.

90.

Watts, D. J. (2004). The new science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243–270.

91.

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440.

92.

Wellman, B. (1983). Network analysis: some basic principles. Sociological Theory, 1, 155-200.

93.

Wellman, B. (1993). An egocentric network tale. Social Networks, 15, 423-36.

94.

Westphal, J. D., Gulati, R., & Shortell, S. M. (1997). Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 366-394.

95.

White, H. C. (1981). Where do markets come from? American Journal of Sociology, 87, 517–547.

96.

Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90-122.

97.

Xiao, D. D. (2013). Research on the polarization effects of the Shandong processing trade and strategy to coordinate its development. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 3(2), 17-22.

98.

Yu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). Conflict analysis of the Nanjing Yuhuan and AO Smith joint venture case. Journal of Business Economics and Environmental Studies, 8(1), 7-15.

99.

Zuckerman, E. W. (2003). On networks and markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 545-565.

100.

Zuckerman, E. W., Kim, T. Y., Ukanwa, K., & Von Rittmann, J. (2003). Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 1018-1074.

Asian Journal of Business Environment