바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Validity and Reliability of Total Quality Management Questionnaire in Greek Primary Education Settings

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2017, v.7 no.1, pp.31-36
Christos Karageorgos (Primary School Teacher & Physical Educat)
Asterios Patsiaouras (University of Thessaly)
Dimitrios Kokaridas (University of Thessaly)
Athanasios Kriemadis (University of Peloponnese)
Antonios A. Travlos (University of Peloponnese)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of the study was to develop a reliable measurement tool for the evaluation of TQM application in Greek education settings and to examine the factors that determine quality of education. Research design, data, and methodology - A questionnaire commencing from the questions included in the Application Guide of Common Assessment Framework was used for research purposes. Each item was scored on a 5point Likert scale - to a sample of 112 educators (55 men, 57 women), all teachers working in public primary education schools. Factor analysis resulted in a questionnaire of 43 items consisting of five factors, teacher satisfaction, school management and operation, motivation, effectiveness of public school leadership and finance management. Results - Results revealed a positive correlation among all factors. Reliability results using Cronbach’s α was high (a=.961) for all factors of the questionnaire ranging from α=.930 (for motivation) to α=.797 (for financial management). Additionally, ICC procedure revealed high values for the above mentioned factors. Conclusions – The study resulted in the construction of a reliable questionnaire focused exclusively on TQM that can be used in future studies using larger samples in different areas so as to draw useful conclusions regarding TQM application in Greek education settings and further identify the factors determining quality in education.

keywords
Total Quality Management, Teachers, Kalampka Area, Primary Education, Primary School Students.

Reference

1.

American Society for Quality (1999). ASQ. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://asq.org/.

2.

Bonser, C. F. (1992). Total quality education?. Public Administration Review, 52, 504–512.

3.

Bonstingl, J. (1992). The total quality classroom. Educational Leadership, 49(6), 66-70.

4.

Brigham, S. (1993). TQM lessons we can learn from industry. Change, May-June, 42-48.

5.

Byrnes, J. A. (1992). Management's new gurus. Business Week, (August 4), 44-52.

6.

DeCosmo, R. D., Parker, J. S., & Heverly, M. A. (1991). Total quality management goes to community colleges. In L. A. Sherr, & D. J. Teeter (Eds.), Total Quality Management in Higher Education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 71 (pp. 27-37). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

7.

Ewell, P. T. (1993). Total Quality and Academic Practice:The idea we've been waiting for?. Change, May/June, 49-55.

8.

Fayol, H. (1949). General and Industrial Administration. London, UK: Sir Issac Pitan & Sons, Ltd.

9.

Heverly, M. A. (1994). Applying total quality to the teaching/learning process. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research. New Orleans, LA. (ED 373 847).

10.

Heverly, M. A., & Cornesky, R. A. (1992). Total quality management: increasing productivity and decreasing costs. New Directions for Institutional Research, 19, 103–114.

11.

Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen : The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Kollberg, B., Elg, M., & Lindmark, J. (2005). Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish health care services: a multiple case study of six development teams. Quality Management in Health Care, 14(2), 95-111.

13.

Ministry of Internal Affairs, Public Administration and Decentralization (2007). Implementation Guide of the Common Assessment Framework. Athens: General Secretariat of Public Administration and eGovernment. Address Quality & Efficiency.

14.

Morgan, C., & Murgatroyd, S. P. (1994). Total quality management in the public sector. Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.

15.

Murgatroyd, S. P., & Morgan, C. (1993). Total quality management and the school. Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.

16.

Neely, A. D., Gregory, M. J., & Platts, K. W. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.

17.

Rhodes, L. A. (1992). On the road to quality. Educational Leadership, 49(6), 76-80.

18.

Saitis, Χ. (2005). Organization and management of education (4th ed.). Athens: self publishing.

19.

Saylor, J. H. (1992). TQM Field Manual. New York:McGraw-Hill.

20.

Scholtes, P. R. (1998). The team handbook. Madison, WI:Joiner Associates.

21.

Sherr, L. A., & Lozier, G. G. (1991). Total quality management in higher education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 71(Fall), 3-11.

22.

Typas, G. (1999). The application of modern methods of management in primary education for effective educational policy. (Doctoral dissertation), Panteio University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Attiki.

23.

Tribus, M. (1993). Quality management in education. Journal for Quality and Participation, 16(1), 12–21.

24.

Tribus, M. (1994). Total quality management in education:the theory and how to put it to work. In G. D. Doherty (Ed.), Developing quality systems in education (pp.83-105), London, UK: Routledge.

25.

Schmit. N, & Landy, F. J. (1993). The concept of validity. In N. Schmitt, & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 275-309), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Asian Journal of Business Environment