바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Determining the Relationship between the Effective Factors of Strategic Behavior: A Case Study for Social Insurance Company of Tehran

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2017, v.7 no.1, pp.5-12
Arsalan Kazemi (Islamic Azad University)
Habibollah Javanmard (Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch)
Ramona Mohammadi (Islamic Azad University,)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - In order to achieve the organizational objectives, the behavior of the employees and their collaboration with management should be taken into account. It has been shown that strategic behavior depends on a number of different factors. The aim of this article was determining the relationship between factors related to the strategic behavior. Research design, data, and methodology - Accordingly, a conceptual model was developed and tested in the form of a survey. Participants of the study were the employees working in the social Insurance company of Tehran. Data was collected using a questionnaire conducted among managers and the staff. A correlation model was used for data analysis by employing the SPSS software. Results - The findings showed there was a relationship between employees’ engagement and the strategic behavior. Conclusions - Our research has demonstrated the effect of employees’ engagement on the strategic-driven behavior, emphasizing the role of employees’ engagement in health-care service firms. Although previous service research has focused on the factors that drive employees’ performance, it seems that most of this research has been inspired by the idea of the service profit chain, focusing on the effect of employees’ satisfaction on performance.

keywords
Autonomy, Strategic Behavior, Employee Engagement, Role Benefit.

Reference

1.

Baumruk, R. (2004). The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success, Workspan, 47(7), 48-52.

2.

Day, G. (1999). Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value. NewYork, NY: Free Press.

3.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

4.

Devenish-Meares, P. (2003). A strategic analysis of the performance of the telephone banking channel. Kingstone, Canada: Thesis for Doctorate in Queen University.

5.

SCutchfield, Douglas F., Hall, Laura, & Ireson, Carol L. (2006). The public and public health organizations:Issues for community engagement in public health, Health Policy. Journal of Elesvier, 77, 76-85.

6.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(3), 250-79.

7.

Hakanen, J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work:From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of vocational behavior, 73, 78-91.

8.

Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation modeling, in Hoyle, R. H. (ed.). Structural Equation Modelling, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

9.

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 331-62.

10.

Gruman, Jamie, & Saks, Alan (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 123-136.

11.

Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

12.

Kim, H. J., Shin, K. H., & Swanger, N. (2009). Burnout and engagement: a comparative analysis using the big five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(6), 96-104.

13.

Lashley, C. (2008). Studying hospitality: insights from social sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 8(1), 69-84.

14.

Lim, B. S. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioral regulation in physical education & physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(4), 52-60.

15.

Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedentsof work engagement: a longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 70(3), 149-171.

16.

Menguc, Bulnet, Auh, Seigyoung, Fisher, Michelle, & Haddad, Abeer (2012). To be engaged or not to be engaged: The antecedents and consequences of service employee engagement. Journal of Business Research, 07464, 1-8.

17.

Nezhadsam, A. (2009). Determining the relationship between factors of organizational culture and organizational effectiveness in social insurance Company of Tehran. Arak, Iran: MD Thesis, in Islamic Azad University.

18.

Rezaeean, M. (2009). Strategic Thinking. Tehran, Iran: MD Thesis in Islamic Azad University.

19.

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.

20.

Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peirό, J. M. (2005). Linking the organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227.

21.

Sanchez-Cardona, I., Rodriguez-Montalban, R., Alfonso-Soto, E., Nieves Lugo, K., Torres-Qquendo, F., & Toro-Alfonso, J. (2012). Self-efficacy and openness to experience as antecedent of study engagement of study engagement: an exploratory analysis. University of Puerto Rico, Department of Psychology. Procedia, Social and behavioral Sciences, 46 8(4), 2163-2167.

22.

Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonza´lez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. The Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(6), 71–92.

23.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). Work engagement. An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (eds.). Managing social and ethical issues in organizations (PP.135–177), Greenwich: Information Age Publishers.

24.

Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M. M. P., A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481.

25.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.

26.

Slatten, Terje, & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees: A study from the hospitality industry. Emerald, 21(1), 88-107.

27.

Tether, B. S. (2005). Do services innovate (differently)8(4), Insights from the EuropeanInn barometer Survey. Industry & Innovation, 12(2), 153-184.

28.

Thomas, K.W., & Velhouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: an interpretativemodel of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.

29.

Ven de ven, A. (1986). Central problem in the management of innovation. Management science, 32(5), 590- 635.

30.

Wong, S. (2008). Exploring the relationship between employee creativity and job-related motivators in the Hong Kong hotel industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 426-437.

31.

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The roles of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121-141.

32.

Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2008). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Asian Journal of Business Environment