- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN2765-6934
- E-ISSN2765-7027
- KCI
ISSN : 2765-6934
The Investigation into the Relationship between Intellectual Preferences Model and Preparation for Organization
Omid Asgari (Delta Consulting Group)
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - The objective of the present study is to examine the relationship between intellectual preferences of individuals and the level of readiness for change according to Ned Herman. Research design, data and methodology - For this, Iranian Supreme Audit Court was selected as a case study in this research and it was carried out to evaluate research variables and test hypotheses using standard questionnaires of intellectual preferences and readiness for change based on the methodology. It should be remarked that only 32 managers of Audit Court were willing to participate in this research and responded to the questionnaires. Results - The outputs of the performed tests showed that although there is not a significant relationship between the individuals with intellectual preferences for class A and readiness for change them, approaching the intellectual preferences of the individuals to D region increases the readiness for change them. On the other hand, whatever individuals have intellectual preferences for branches in groups B and C, the level of preparedness for change is low. Conclusions - The results of this research have made a clear policy for the effective utilization in human resources based on their intellectual preferences model for management with organizational changes.
- keywords
- Intellectual Preferences, Cerebral Quarter, Readiness for Organizational Change, Supreme Audit Court.
Reference
Armenakis, A., & Bedeian, A. (1999). Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.
Armenakis, A., & Harris, S. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169-183.
Dalton, C., & Gottlieb, L. (2003). The concept of readiness to change. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(2), 108-117.
Dorfman, R. (1994). Aging into the 21st century (1st ed.). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Harris, S., & Cole, M. (2007). A stages of change perspective on managers' motivation to learn in a leadership development context. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(6), 774-793.
Herrmann, N. (1996). The whole brain business book (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Huy, Q. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325-345.
Jimmieson, N., White, K., & Peach, M. (2004). Employee readiness for change: Utilizing the theory of planned behavior to inform change management. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2004(1), C1-C6.
Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change (1st ed.). Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business Review Press.
Kraatz, M., & Zajac, E. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(5), 632-657.
Mohanty, R., & Yadav, O. (2000). Understanding the fundamentals for managing change. Measuring Business Excellence, 4(4).
Mills, J. H., Dye, K., & Mills, A. J. (2009). Understanding organizational change. N. Y., NY: Routledge.
Papadakis, V., Lioukas, S., & Chambers, D. (1998). Strategic decision-making processes: the role of management and context. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2), 115-147.
Robbins, S. (2001). Organizational behavior (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weiner, B. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), 44-67.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations