- Log In/Sign Up
- P-ISSN2765-6934
- E-ISSN2765-7027
- KCI
ISSN : 2765-6934
A Conceptual Framework for Determination of Appropriate Business Model in e-Learning Industry in Iran
Reza Samizadeh (Tarbiat Modares University of Iran)
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to present a framework for determining the most appropriate business model for e-learning. Research design, data, and methodology – The Electronics Branch of Azad University has been elected as a case study in this research. This study conducted using a descriptive method. The information was obtained using interviews with experts including managers, faculty and students at the Electronics Branch of Azad University. Results – Three service-product system (product oriented system, use an oriented and result oriented system) approaches determined a framework for the formation of a portfolio. This portfolio is including three types of e-learning business models. Examining the relevant characteristics, correspondence of behaviorism learning theory with a product-oriented approach, correspondence of cognitivism theory with a user-oriented approach and in finally match correspondence of constructivist learning theory with a results-oriented approach which is evident. Conclusions – After reviewing the literature on the fields of e-learning, business model and product - service systems, we have achieved three types of e-learning business models. Then the variables in any of the business models were defined by using business model canvas tool and thus a portfolio consisting of three types of e-learning business model canvas was obtained.
- keywords
- e-Learning, Business Model, Product-Service System.
Reference
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of Online Learning, 2, 15-44.
Barquet, A. P. B., De Oliveira, M. G., Amigo, C. R., Cunha, V. P., & Rozenfeld, H. (2013). Employing the business model concept to support the adoption of product–service systems (PSS). Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 693-704.
Bieger, T., & Reinhold, S. (2011). Das wertbasierte Geschäftsmodell–Ein aktualisierter Strukturierungsansatz. Innovative Geschäftsmodelle, 13-70.
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Prentice-Hall, Inc., One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 195-215.
Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm shifts in designed instruction: From behaviorism to cognitivism to constructivism. Educational technology, 33(5), 12-19.
Goedkoop, M. J., Van Halen, C. J., Te Riele, H., & Rommens, P. J. (1999). Product service systems, ecological and economic basics. Report for Dutch Ministries of environment (VROM) and economic affairs (EZ), 36(1), 1-122.
Goethals, F. (2009). The unified business model framework. Little Economie & Management, 9, 1-47.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational psychology: A realistic approach. White Plains, NY; Longman.
Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practic. California: Pine Forge Press.
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., & Devedžić, V. (2006). Dynamic assembly of personalized learning content on the semantic web. In European Semantic Web Conference (pp.545-559). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Kaur, M., & Singh, B. (2011). eLearning, eHealth and eBusiness in India. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Communication and Management (ICCCM 2011).
Kim, S., & Im, K. H. (2012). Business model characterization by analyzing business model components of patent data. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 6(1), 303-309.
Lawton, W., & Katsomitros, A. (2012). MOOCs and disruptive innovation: The challenge to HE business models. London: Observatory on Borderless Higher Education.
Lee, C., Song, B., & Park, Y. (2009). Generation of new service concepts: A morphology analysis and genetic algorithm approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(10), 12454-12460.
Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). JIME-The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1).
Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design and learning theory. Retrieved January, 4, 2010.
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1.
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413.
Seppanen, M., & Makinen, S. (2007). Towards a classification of resources for the business model concept. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(4), 389-404.
Roweton, W. E. (1979). BF Skinner. Reflections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tan, A. R. (2010). Service-oriented product development strategies. DTU Management.
Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business strategy and the environment, 13(4), 246-260.
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International journal of educational research, 31(5), 357-442.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Wilson, B. G. (1997). Reflections on constructivism and instructional design. Instructional development paradigms, 63-80.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations