- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN2765-6934
- E-ISSN2765-7027
- KCI
ISSN : 2765-6934
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Financing Constraints and Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity
Yin Hong (Suzhou Vocational University)
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and investment-cash flow sensitivity, which is a surrogate for financing constraints. Research design, data, and methodology – Taking China’s A-share listed companies between 2009 and 2016 as a sample, this paper empirically tests the relationship between CSRD and investment-cash flow sensitivity by Panel VAR model. By introducing the orthogonal impulse response function, this paper distinguishes the fundamental factors and financial ones that affect corporate investment behavior. Results – Findings indicate that: (1) investment-cash flow sensitivity of firms with low level of CSRD is significantly lower than that of firms with high level of CSRD; (2) the orthogonal impulse response of corporate investment to cash flow in firms with high level of CSRD is significantly different from zero, but it is not significant in firms with low level of CSRD; (3) for firms with low level of CSRD, 0.7% of corporate investment volatility can be explained by the change in cash flow, which is lower than that of firms with high level of CSRD (1.1%). Conclusions - Corporations disclosing more and higher quality CSRD are often those faced with financing constraints. Voluntary disclosure can help them alleviate information asymmetry and financing constraints.
- keywords
- CSRD, financing constraints, investment-cash flow sensitivity.
Reference
Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis. Accounting Organizations & Society, 12(2), 111-122.
Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325-1359.
Fazzari S., Hubbard, G., Peterson, B. (1988). Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), 141-195.
Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility Measured through Global Reporting Initiative Reporting:Factors Affecting the Behavior of Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 81, 244-254.
Giannarakis, G. (2014). Corporate Governance and Financial Characteristic Effects on the Extent of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(4), 569-590.
Gunawan, J. (2015). Corporate Social Disclosures in Indonesia: Stakeholders’ Influence and Motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 535-552.
Islam, M., & Deegan, C. (2010). Media Pressures and Corporate Disclosure of Social Responsibility Performance Information: A Study of Two Global Clothing and Sports Retail Companies. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 131-148.
Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190-210.
Newson, M., & Deegan, C. (2002). Global Expectations and Their Association with Corporate Social Disclosure Practices in Australia, Singapore, and South Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 37, 183–213.
Orij, R. (2010). Corporate Social Disclosures in the Context of National Cultures and Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 868-889.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: an Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting Organizations & Society, 17(6), 595-612.
Said, R., Zainuddin, Y. H., & Haron, H. (2009). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Corporate Governance Characteristics in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 212-226.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations