ISSN : 2765-6934
Purpose - The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness in educational differences between students of the government's financialfunded groups and the non-financial-funded groups at a university in Korea. Research design, data, and methodology - The study was conducted using a survey tool of National Assessment for Student Engagement in Learning. In total, 334 participants were surveyed, of which 290 students were participants in economic support program and 44 were nonattendance program students. The general characteristics of all of the participants were investigated by frequency analysis. The analysis of participants’ collective characteristics used independent t and f-test, and one-way ANOVA with IBM SPSS Statistics package program 22.0. Results - The number of participating students is higher than that of non-participating students in relation to in-activities of university immersion, but the number of participating students is lower than that of non-participating students in relation to in-quality of student support. However, there was no statistical significance. The confidence coefficient of the university-immersion and student support questionnaire is 0.860 and 0.913, respectively. Conclusions - There is no significant difference in the activities of university immersion and student support between students who participate in the economic support program and those who do not.
Abeysekera, I., & Jebeile, S. (2019). Why Learners Found Transfer Pricing Difficult? Implications for Directors. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(1), 9-19.
Alemu, A. M., & Cordier, J. (2017). Factors influencing international student satisfaction in Korean universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 57, 54–64.
Astin, A., & Antonio, A. (2012). Assessment for excellence:The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Journal of College Student Development. 55(4), 427-429.
Bae, S. H., Kang, M. S., & Hong, J. I. (2015). Validation of the National Survey of Student Engagement(NSSE)Model in the Korean Context. Asian journal of education, 16(4), 77-104.
Bean, J. (1985). Interaction effects based on class level in an explanatory model of college. American Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 35-64.
Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 9–49.
Blumenthal, V., & Jensen, Ø. (2019). Consumer immersion in the experiencescape of managed visitor attractions:The nature of the immersion process and the role of involvement. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 159–170.
Cameron, W. J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
Cheslock, J. J., & Hughes, R. P. (2011). Differences across states in higher education finance policy. Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 369–393.
Cho, H. C., & Kwon, S. J. (2015). A Exploration Study on Practical Use of National Diagnostic Assessment Results for Developing Teaching and Learning Competencies of Local University. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 5(4), 521-528.
Choi, E. M., Park, Y. S., & Kwon, L. S. (2019). The Impact of State Financial Support on Active-Collaborative Learning Activities and Faculty-Student Interaction. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 10(2), 25-37.
Fricke, H., Lechner, M., & Steinmayr, A. (2018). The effects of incentives to exercise on student performance in college. Economics of Education Review, 66, 14-39.
Fryer, R. G, (2011). Financial incentives and student achievement: evidence from randomized trials. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1755-1798.
Gneezy, U., Meier, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 191-209.
Gunnes, T., Kirkeb en, L. J., & Rønning, M. (2013). Financial incentives and study duration in higher education. Labour Economics, 25, 1–11.
Hakan, K., & Munire, E. (2014). Academic Motivation:Gender, Domain and Grade Differences. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 708–715.
Han, S. S., & Yim, D. S. (2018). Path Dependence in Industry-University Cooperation- In terms of Industry’s Voluntary Participation. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 9(3), 45-56.
Hong, J., & Bae, S. H. (2015). The effect of professorstudent interaction on college immersion in college students. Education and Administration Studies, 33(3), 351-379.
Hudsona, S., Matson-Barkatb, S., Pallaminc, N., & Jegouc, G. (2018). With or without you? Interaction and immersion in a virtual reality experience. Journal of Business Research, on line 16 November. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.062
Hwang, S. Y., & Jung, H. J. (2018). The Interactive Effects of Motivation and Contingent Rewards on Employee Creativity. International Journal of Industrial Distribution &Business, 9(7), 71-82.
Jovanovic, D., & Matejevic, M. (2014). Relationship between Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation for Learning –Researches Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 456–460.
Jacob, W. J., & Gokbel, V. (2018). Global higher education learning outcomes and financial trends: Comparative and innovative approaches. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 5-17.
Kemptner, D., & Tolana, S. (2018). The role of time preferences in educational decision making. Economics of Education Review, 67, 25–39.
Kim, B. J., & Park, N. G. (2018). Lessons learned from financing universal higher education in Korea. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 116-127.
Kim, S. C. (2012). A Study on Efficiently Designing Customer Rewards Programs. Journal of Distribution Science, 10(1), 5-10.
Kim, S. M., & Park, C. H. (2016). Development and Validation of CK Satisfaction Scale, The Educational Research Institute. The Journal of Educational Research, 14(4), 41-60.
Kim, S. Y., & Kim, J. E. (2013). Analysis Research for the Effect of School Engagement on Learning Outcomes and Related Factors in Higher Education. Asian journal of education, 14(4), 73-96.
Lee, H. S., & Lee, Y. M. (2015). Analyzing the Current States of Universities' Interdisciplinary Fields and Influential Factors Impacting on the Fields. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 5(2), 167-174.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. The School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.
Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
List, J. A., Livingston, J. A., & Neckermann, S. (2018). Do financial incentives crowd out intrinsic motivation to perform on standardized tests? Economics of Education Review, 66, 125-136.
Min, G. O., & Loh, J. H. (2016). Impact of Educational Service Information Distribution on Students’ Satisfaction and Achievement Rate. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 7(4), 17-31.
Orsini, C. A., Binnie, V. I., & Jerez, O. M. (2019). Motivation as a Predictor of Dental Students' Affective and Behavioral Outcomes: Does the Quality of Motivation Matter?. Journal of Dental Education, 83(3), 228-236.
Oswald, Y., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2014). Learning for a bonus: How financial incentives interact with preferences. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 52–61.
Park, M. J. (2018). A Study on College Students’Perceptions on CK- : Based on Analysis of Importance and Satisfaction, Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), 589-613.
Park, S. Y., Kim, E. H., Kim, S. W., & Yim, J. W. (2018). Effects of the Engagement of University for Creative Korea (CK) on Students’ Teaching-Learning Competency:Focusing on the Performance Outcomes of K University Specialization Project Team. Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 9(5), 155-168.
Parveen, M., Ullah, O., Salam, M., & Zakir, N. (2014). Impact of Teachers’ Professional Development on Students’ Performance. International Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 5(3), 15-24.
Pedersen, D. E. (2010). Active and Collaborative Learning in an Undergraduate Sociological Theory Course. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 197-206.
Salehinejad, A., & Samizadeh, R. (2017). A Conceptual Framework for Determination of Appropriate Business Model in e-Learning Industry in Iran. East Asian Journal of Business Management, 7(4), 17-25.
Seo, K. T., & Cheon, M. S. (2018). A Study on the Analysis of the Difference between Professor and University Student about Teaching Competencys Recognition. Asiapacific journal of multimedia services convergent with art, humanities, and sociology, 8(4), 471-482.
Shin, H. S., & Choi, J. Y. (2014). Examining Effects of Grant on Achievement and Adjustment of college students:Focusing on Differential Effects by Family Income and Institutional Location. The Korean Society For The Economics And Finance Of Education. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 23(2), 153-177.
Song. Y. J., Chang, W. S., & Chang, J. H. (2018). The Effective Factors of Professional Learning : Study on Accounting Firms in Korea. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5(2), 81-94.
Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2012). Student engagement in higher education: theory, context, practice. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 1-3.