The Agreements between FEV1 and PEFR in the Patients of Mild Bronchial Asthma

Background : Several studies have shown considerable disagreement when using the FEV1 and PEFR to assess the severity of an airflow obstruction. A differential classification of the severity of asthma would lead to serious differences in the evaluation and management of asthma. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the FEV1 and PEFR in asthma patients with mild symptoms. Methods : In this study, the PEFR and FEV1 were obtained from 92 adult asthma patients with mild symptoms attending an outpatient pulmonary clinic. The mean differences and the limits of agreement in the paired measurements of the FEV1 and PEFR were calculated. Results : There was a considerable correlation between the FEV1 and PEFR measurements when expressed as a % of the predicted values (r=0.686, p<0.01). The 95% limit of agreement (mean difference ±1.96SD) between the FEV1 % and PEFR % were acceptable(-27.4%～33.8%). In addition, the weighted κ(kappa) coefficient for the agreement between the FEV1 % and PEFR % was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81), indicating excellent agreement between the two measurements. Conclusion : The spirometer (FEV1) and the Mini-Wright peak flow meter (PEFR) can be used interchangeably in adult asthma patients with mild symptom. (Tuberc Respir Dis 2005; 59: 638-643)

keywords: Mild asthma, FEV1, PEFR, Severity, Mild asthma, FEV1, PEFR, Severity

Reference

(amrevrespirdis1987) Standard for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,

(revised2002) Global Statege for Asthma Management and Prevention,

(1998) The guideline for asthma treatment,

(thorax1979) Comparison of the new miniature Wright peak flow meter with the standard Wright peak flow meter,

Use of the peak flow meter in office practice,

(1993) Global Statege for Asthma Management and Prevention,

(2001) Peak expiratory flow in normal healthy Korean subjects measured by mini-wright peak flow meter,

(bmj1989) New regression equations for predicting peak expiratory flow in adults,

(lancet1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,

10.

(chest1989) Comparison of PEFR and FEV1 in patients with varying degrees of airway obstruction effect of modest altitude,

11.

(brmedj1959) Maximum forced expiratory flow rate as a measure of ventilatory capacity,

12.

(lancet1976) Pulmonary monitor for assessment of airways obstruction,

13.

(brjdischest1977) Diurnal variation of asthma,

14.

(thorax1994) Evaluation of a new electronic spiromrter,

15.

(thorax1987) Evaluation of the turbine pocket spirometer,

16.

(2002) The relationship between PEF and FEV1 in the assessment of the severity of airway obstruction,

17.

(1998) Classification of asthma severity : should the international guideline be changed?,

18.

(2004) Validity of peak expiratory flow for assessing the presence of airflow obstruction,

19.

(brjdischest1971) The assessment of airflow obstruction,

20.

(1995) Home peak expiratory flow rate monitoring in patients with asthma,

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.59 No.6

The Agreements between FEV1 and PEFR in the Patients of Mild Bronchial Asthma

Abstract

Reference

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases