바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.70 No.1
Citation Share

Comparative Analysis of Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA)-Mediated Real-Time PCR Clamping and DNA Direct Sequencing for EGFR Mutation Detection

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2011, v.70 no.1, pp.21-27









& (2011). Comparative Analysis of Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA)-Mediated Real-Time PCR Clamping and DNA Direct Sequencing for EGFR Mutation Detection. Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, 70(1), 21-27.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Background: Although the gold standard method for research trials on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been direct sequencing, this approach has the limitations of low sensitivity and of being time-consuming. Peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) clamping is known to be a more sensitive detection tool. The aim of this study was to compare the detection rate of EGFR mutation and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) responsiveness according to EGFR mutation status using both methodologies. Methods: Clinical specimens from 112 NSCLC patients were analyzed for EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21. All clinical data and tumor specimens were obtained from 3 university hospitals in Korea. After genomic DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue specimens, both PNA-mediated PCR clamping and direct-sequencing were performed. The results and clinical response to EGFR-TKIs were compared. Results: Sequencing revealed a total of 35 (22.9%) mutations: 8 missense mutations in exon 21 and 26 deletion mutations in exon 19. PNA-mediated PCR clamping showed the presence of genomic alterations in 45 (28.3%) samples, including the 32 identified by sequencing plus 13 additional samples (6 in exon 19 and 7 in exon 21). Conclusion: PNA-mediated PCR clamping is simple and rapid, as well as a more sensitive method for screening of genomic alterations in EGFR gene compared to direct sequencing. This data suggests that PNA-mediated PCR clamping should be implemented as a useful screening tool for detection of EGFR mutations in clinical setting.

keywords
Peptide Nucleic Acids, Molecular Sequencing Data, Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor, Epidermal Growth Factor, Peptide Nucleic Acids, Molecular Sequencing Data, Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor, Epidermal Growth Factor

Reference

1.

1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346:92-8.

2.

2. Ciardiello F, Tortora G. A novel approach in the treatment of cancer: targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2958-70.

3.

3. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2129-39.

4.

4. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497-500.

5.

5. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:13306-11.

6.

6. Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Yang CH, Chu DT, Saijo N, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947- 57.

7.

7. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:121-8.

8.

8. Eberhard DA, Giaccone G, Johnson BE; Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group. Biomarkers of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Working Group: standardization for use in the clinical trial setting. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:983-94.

9.

9. Jänne PA, Borras AM, Kuang Y, Rogers AM, Joshi VA, Liyanage H, et al. A rapid and sensitive enzymatic method for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation screening. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:751-8.

10.

10. Chin TM, Anuar D, Soo R, Salto-Tellez M, Li WQ, Ahmad B, et al. Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor variations by partially denaturing HPLC. Clin Chem 2007;53:62-70.

11.

11. Hoshi K, Takakura H, Mitani Y, Tatsumi K, Momiyama N, Ichikawa Y, et al. Rapid detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer by the SMart-Amplification Process. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13: 4974-83.

12.

12. Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Huqun, Tanaka T, Udagawa K, Kato M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer Res 2005;65:7276-82.

13.

13. Tanaka T, Nagai Y, Miyazawa H, Koyama N, Matsuoka S, Sutani A, et al. Reliability of the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction clamp-based test for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations integrated into the clinical practice for non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Sci 2007;98:246-52.

14.

14. Nielsen PE, Egholm M. An introduction to peptide nucleic acid. Curr Issues Mol Biol 1999;1:89-104.

15.

15. Lee KY, Kim HJ, Kim SJ, Yoo GH, Kim WD, Oh SY, et al. PNA-mediated PCR clamping for the detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Tuberc Respir Dis 2010;69:271-8.

16.

16. Hwang TS. Molecular biologic techniques in cytopathologic diagnosis. Korean J Pathol 2009;43:387-92.

17.

17. Dahabreh IJ, Linardou H, Siannis F, Kosmidis P, Bafaloukos D, Murray S. Somatic EGFR mutation and gene copy gain as predictive biomarkers for response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:291-303.

18.

18. Neal JW, Sequist LV. Targeted therapies: optimal firstline therapy for NSCLC with EGFR mutations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010;7:71-2.

19.

19. Rosell R, Viteri S, Molina MA, Benlloch S, Taron M. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment in advanced nonsmallcell lung cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2010;22:112-20.

20.

20. Choi J, Cho M, Oh M, Kim H, Kil MS, Park H. PNA-mediated real-time PCR clamping for detection of EGFR mutations. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2010;31:3525-9.

21.

21. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:169-81.

22.

22. Sakurada A, Lara-Guerra H, Liu N, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. Tissue heterogeneity of EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:527-9.

23.

23. Wang J, Ramakrishnan R, Tang Z, Fan W, Kluge A, Dowlati A, et al. Quantifying EGFR alterations in the lung cancer genome with nanofluidic digital PCR arrays. Clin Chem 2010;56:623-32.

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases

e-Submission OA Policy