바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Evaluation of Obstructive Pulmonary Function Impairment Risks in Pulmonary Emphysema Detected by Low-Dose CT: Compared with Simple Digital Radiography

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2011, v.71 no.1, pp.37-45



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary emphysema (PE) is major cause of obstructive pulmonary function impairment (OPFI), which is diagnosed by spirometry. PE by high resolution CT is known to be correlated with OPFI. Recently, low dose CT (LDCT) has been increasingly used for screening interstitial lung diseases including PE. The aim of this study was to evaluate OPFI risks of subjects with PE detected by LDCT compared with those detected by simple digital radiography (SDR). Methods: LDCT and spirometry were administered to 266 inorganic dust exposed retired workers, from May 30, 2007 to August 31, 2008. This study was approved by our institutional review board and informed consent was obtained. OPFI risk was defined as less than 0.7 of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC), and relative risk (RR) of OPFI of PE was calculated by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 266 subjects, PE was found in 28 subjects (10.5%) by LDCT and in 11 subjects (4.1%) by SDR; agreement was relatively low (kappa value=0.32, p<0.001). FEV1 and FEV1/FVC were significantly different between PE and no PE groups determined by either SDR or LDCT. The differences between groups were larger when the groups were divided by the findings of SDR. When PE was present in either LDCT or SDR assays, the RRs of OPFI were 2.34 and 8.65, respectively. Conclusion: LDCT showed significantly higher sensitivity than SDR for detecting PE, especially low grade PE, in which pulmonary function is not affected. As a result, the OPFI risks in the PE group by LDCT was lower than that in the PE group by SDR.

keywords
Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiation Dosage, Plumonary Emphysema, Spirometry, Radiography, Digital

Reference

1.

1. Thurlbeck WM, Müller NL. Emphysema: definition, imaging, and quantification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1017-25.

2.

2. Kim HK, Lee SD. Pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tuberc Respir Dis 2005; 59:5-13.

3.

3. Litmanovich D, Boiselle PM, Bankier AA. CT of pulmonary emphysema--current status, challenges, and future directions. Eur Radiol 2009;19:537-51.

4.

4. Bauer TT, Heyer CM, Duchna HW, Andreas K, Weber A, Schmidt EW, et al. Radiological findings, pulmonary function and dyspnea in underground coal miners. Respiration 2007;74:80-7.

5.

5. Horiuchi N, Fujita J, Suemitsu I, Yamasaki Y, Higa F, Tateyama M. Low-dose multislice CT and high-resolution CT assessment of pulmonary emphysema in public school teachers. Lung 2007;185:25-30.

6.

6. Lee SM, Hur J, Kim TH, Kim SJ, Kim HJ. Quantitative assessment of lung volumes using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). J Korean Radiol Soc 2008;59:91-7.

7.

7. Kang JH, Chun JH, Gu HW, Ko KS, Yu BC, Sohn HS, et al. Diagnostic meaning of high resolution computed tomography compared with chest radiography for screening of welder's lung. J Prev Med Public Health 1996;29:853-62.

8.

8. Kim KI, Choi SJ, Sohn HS, Lee JW, Jung DH, Lee SH, et al. High-resolution CT findings of welders' pneumoconiosis. J Korean Radiol Soc 1996;34:367-71.

9.

9. Kim KA, Kim JH, Chang HS, Ahn HS, Lim Y, Yun IG. The diagnostic role of HRCT in simple pneumoconiosis. Korean J Prev Med 1996;29:471-82.

10.

10. Jung EJ, Kim YK, Lee YM, Kim KU, Uh ST, Kim YH, et al. The correlation of dyspnea and radiologic quantity in patients with COPD. Tuberc Respir Dis 2009; 66:288-94.

11.

11. Naidich DP, Marshall CH, Gribbin C, Arams RS, McCauley DI. Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. Radiology 1990;175:729-31.

12.

12. Diederich S, Wormanns D, Heindel W. Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Eur J Radiol 2003;45:2-7.

13.

13. Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Whiting BR, Hong C, Bierhals AJ, Kim JH, et al. Comparison of standard- and low-ra diation-dose CT for quantification of emphysema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:42-7.

14.

14. Sim YS, Ham E, Choi KY, Lee SY, Kim SC, Kim YK, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of lung function associated with emphysema in healthy smokers. Tuberc Respir Dis 2010;69:177-83.

15.

15. Omori H, Nakashima R, Otsuka N, Mishima Y, Tomiguchi S, Narimatsu A, et al. Emphysema detected by lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence, and correlation with smoking habits and pulmonary function in Japanese male subjects. Respirology 2006;11:205-10.

16.

16. Lopes AJ, Mogami R, Capone D, Tessarollo B, de Melo PL, Jansen JM. High-resolution computed tomography in silicosis: correlation with chest radiography and pulmonary function tests. J Bras Pneumol 2008;34:264-72.

17.

17. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute (OSHRI). Guideline of quality assurance for pneumoconiosis [Internet]. Incheon: OSHRI; 2010 [cited: Mar 10, 2010]. Available from: http://oshri.kosha.or.kr/ board?tc=RetrieveBoardViewCmd&boardType=A&contentId= 208741&pageNum=1&urlCode=T1|Y|404|371- |||||/board&tabId.

18.

18. International Labour Office (ILO). Guidelines for the use of the ILO international classification of radiographs of pneumoconioses. Revised ed. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2002.

19.

19. Friedman PJ. Imaging studies in emphysema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:494-500.

20.

20. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319-38.

21.

21. Korean Statistical Information Service. The cause of death statistics [Internet]. Daejeon: Korea National Statistical Office [cited: March 10, 2010]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/abroad/abroad_01List.jsp.

22.

22. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619-28.

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases