바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.80 No.4
Citation Share

Nonspecific Bronchoprovocation Test

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2017, v.80 no.4, pp.344-350






& (2017). Nonspecific Bronchoprovocation Test. Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases, 80(4), 344-350.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Bronchial asthma is a disease characterized by the condition of airway hyper-responsiveness, which serves to produce narrowing of the airway secondary to airway inflammation and/or various spasm-inducing stimulus. Nonspecific bronchoprovocation testing is an important method implemented for the purpose of diagnosing asthma; this test measures the actual degree of airway hyper-responsiveness and utilizes direct and indirect bronchoprovocation testing. Direct bronchoprovocation testing using methacholine or histamine may have superior sensitivity as these substances directly stimulate the airway smooth muscle cells. On the other hand, this method also engenders the specific disadvantage of relatively low specificity. Indirect bronchoprovocation testing using mannitol, exercise, hypertonic saline, adenosine and hyperventilation serves to produce reactions in the airway smooth muscle cells by liberating mediators with stimulation of airway inflammatory cells. Therefore, this method has the advantage of high specificity and also demonstrates relatively low sensitivity. Direct and indirect testing both call for very precise descriptions of very specific measurement conditions. In addition, it has become evident that challenge testing utilizing each of the various bronchoconstrictor stimuli requires distinct and specific protocols. It is therefore important that the clinician understand the mechanism by which the most commonly used bronchoprovocation testing works. It is important that the clinician understand the mechanism of action in the testing, whether direct stimuli (methacholine) or indirect stimuli (mannitol, exercise) is implemented, when the testing is performed and the results interpreted.

keywords
Airway Hyper-responsiveness, Bronchial Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests

Reference

1.

1. Sterk PJ, Fabbri LM, Quanjer PH, Cockcroft DW, O’Byrne PM, Anderson SD, et al. Airway responsiveness: standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl 1993;16:53-83.

2.

2. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Irvin CG, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:309-29.

3.

3. Perpina Tordera M, Garcia Rio F, Alvarez Gutierrez FJ, Cisneros Serrano C, Compte Torrero L, Entrenas Costa LM, et al. Guidelines for the study of nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma. Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR). Arch Bronconeumol 2013;49:432-46.

4.

4. Bochner BS, Undem BJ, Lichtenstein LM. Immunological aspects of allergic asthma. Annu Rev Immunol 1994;12:295-335.

5.

5. Woolcock AJ, Salome CM, Yan K. The shape of the dose-response curve to histamine in asthmatic and normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;130:71-5.

6.

6. Grootendorst DC, Rabe KF. Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2004;1:77-87.

7.

7. Joos GF. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness: too complex to be useful? Curr Opin Pharmacol 2003;3:233-8.

8.

8. Busse WW. The relationship of airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation: airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest 2010;138(2 Suppl):4S-10S.

9.

9. Joos GF, O’Connor B, Anderson SD, Chung F, Cockcroft DW, Dahlen B, et al. Indirect airway challenges. Eur Respir J 2003;21:1050-68.

10.

10. Cockcroft D, Davis B. Direct and indirect challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009;103:363-9.

11.

11. O’Byrne PM, Inman MD. Airway hyperresponsiveness. Chest 2003;123(3 Suppl):411S-6S.

12.

12. Hargreave FE, Ryan G, Thomson NC, O’Byrne PM, Latimer K, Juniper EF, et al. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine in asthma: measurement and clinical significance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981;68:347-55.

13.

13. Gilbert R, Auchincloss JH Jr. Post-test probability of asthma following methacholine challenge. Chest 1990;97:562-5.

14.

14. Cockcroft DW, Murdock KY, Berscheid BA, Gore BP. Sensitivity and specificity of histamine PC20 determination in a random selection of young college students. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;89(1 Pt 1):23-30.

15.

15. Cockcroft DW. Methacholine challenge: PD20 versus PC20. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:291-2.

16.

16. Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Backer V. The use of inhaled mannitol in the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012;13:115-23.

17.

17. Anderson SD. Indirect challenge tests: airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest 2010;138(2 Suppl):25S-30S.

18.

18. Franklin PJ, Stick SM, Le Souef PN, Ayres JG, Turner SW. Measuring exhaled nitric oxide levels in adults: the importance of atopy and airway responsiveness. Chest 2004;126:1540-5.

19.

19. Koskela HO, Hyvarinen L, Brannan JD, Chan HK, Anderson SD. Responsiveness to three bronchial provocation tests in patients with asthma. Chest 2003;124:2171-7.

20.

20. Brannan JD, Anderson SD, Perry CP, Freed-Martens R, Lassig AR, Charlton B, et al. The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline. Respir Res 2005;6:144.

21.

21. Leuppi JD, Brannan JD, Anderson SD. Bronchial provocation tests: the rationale for using inhaled mannitol as a test for airway hyperresponsiveness. Swiss Med Wkly 2002;132:151-8.

22.

22. Koskela HO, Hyvarinen L, Brannan JD, Chan HK, Anderson SD. Coughing during mannitol challenge is associated with asthma. Chest 2004;125:1985-92.

23.

23. Deal EC Jr, McFadden ER Jr, Ingram RH Jr, Strauss RH, Jaeger JJ. Role of respiratory heat exchange in production of exerciseinduced asthma. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1979;46:467-75.

24.

24. Finnerty JP, Holgate ST. Evidence for the roles of histamine and prostaglandins as mediators in exercise-induced asthma:the inhibitory effect of terfenadine and flurbiprofen alone and in combination. Eur Respir J 1990;3:540-7.

25.

25. Randolph C. Exercise-induced asthma: update on pathophysiology, clinical diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Probl Pediatr 1997;27:53-77.

26.

26. Nish WA, Schwietz LA. Underdiagnosis of asthma in young adults presenting for USAF basic training. Ann Allergy 1992;69:239-42.

27.

27. Sinclair DG, Sims MM, Hoad NA, Winfield CR. Exerciseinduced airway narrowing in army recruits with a history of childhood asthma. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1314-7.

28.

28. Haby MM, Anderson SD, Peat JK, Mellis CM, Toelle BG, Woolcock AJ. An exercise challenge protocol for epidemiological studies of asthma in children: comparison with histamine challenge. Eur Respir J 1994;7:43-9.

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases

e-Submission OA Policy