바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Pleural Space Elastance and Its Relation to Success Rates of Pleurodesis in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2021, v.84 no.1, pp.67-73
https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2020.0081
Hossam Hosny Masoud (Department of Chest Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt)
Mahmoud Mohamed El-Zorkany (Department of Chest Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt)
Azza Anwar Ahmed (Department of Chest Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt)
Hebatallah Hany Assal (Cairo University)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Background: Pleurodesis fails in 10%–40% of patients with recurrent malignant pleural effusions malignant pleural effusion and dyspnea. This study aimed to assess the values of pleural elastance (PEL) after the aspiration of 500 mL of pleural fluid and their relation to the pleurodesis outcome, and to compare the pleurodesis outcome with the chemical characteristics of pleural fluid. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in Kasr El-Aini Hospital, Cairo University, during the period from March 2019 to January 2020. The study population consisted of 40 patients with malignant pleural effusion. The measurement of PEL after the aspiration of 500 mL of fluid was done with “PEL 0.5” (cm H2O/L), and the characteristics of the pleural fluid were chemically and cytologically analyzed. Pleurodesis was done and the patients were evaluated one month later. The PEL values were compared with pleurodesis outcomes. Results: After 4-week of follow-up, the success rate of pleurodesis was 65%. The PEL 0.5 was significantly higher in failed pleurodesis than it was in successful pleurodesis. A cutoff point of PEL 0.5 >14.5 cm H2O/L was associated with pleurodesis failure with a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 100%, respectively. The patients with failed pleurodesis had significantly lower pH levels in fluid than those in the successful group (p<0.001). Conclusion: PEL measurement was a significant predictor in differentiating between failed and successful pleurodesis. The increase in acidity of the malignant pleural fluid can be used as a predictor for pleurodesis failure in patients with malignant pleural effusion.

keywords
Pleural Elastance, Malignant Pleural Effusion, Pleurodesis

Reference

1.

1. Psallidas I, Kalomenidis I, Porcel JM, Robinson BW, Stathopoulos GT. Malignant pleural effusion: from bench to bedside. Eur Respir Rev 2016;25:189-98.

2.

2. Bibby AC, Dorn P, Psallidas I, Porcel JM, Janssen J, Froudarakis M, et al. ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:116-32.

3.

3. Pannu JK, Lentz RJ. Discordance between pleural elastance and postthoracentesis chest radiograph: putting pressure on pleurodesis trials. Chest 2020;157:249-50.

4.

4. Huggins JT, Sahn SA, Heidecker J, Ravenel JG, Doelken P. Characteristics of trapped lung: pleural fluid analysis, manometry, and air-contrast chest CT. Chest 2007;131:206-13.

5.

5. Chopra A, Judson MA, Doelken P, Maldonado F, Rahman NM, Huggins JT. The relationship of pleural manometry with postthoracentesis chest radiographic findings in malignant pleural effusion. Chest 2020;157:421-6.

6.

6. Lan RS, Lo SK, Chuang ML, Yang CT, Tsao TC, Lee CH. Elastance of the pleural space: a predictor for the outcome of pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusion. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:768-74.

7.

7. Martin GA, Tsim S, Kidd AC, Foster JE, McLoone P, Chalmers A, et al. Pre-EDIT: a randomized feasibility trial of elastancedirected intrapleural catheter or talc pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusion. Chest 2019;156:1204-13.

8.

8. Ferreiro L, San Jose E, Gude F, Valdes L. Pleural fluid analysis and pleural elastance as predictors of response to pleurodesis in patients with malignant pleural effusion. Arch Bronconeu mol 2018;54:163-5.

9.

9. Pantazopoulos I, Xanthos T, Vlachos I, Kakoulas Z, Stroumpoulis K, Chalkias A, et al. Pleural fluid glucose: a predictor of unsuccessful pleurodesis in a preselected cohort of patients with malignant pleural effusion. J BUON 2014;19:1018-23.

10.

10. Heffner JE, Nietert PJ, Barbieri C. Pleural fluid pH as a predictor of pleurodesis failure: analysis of primary data. Chest 2000;117:87-95.

11.

11. Yildirim H, Metintas M, Ak G, Metintas S, Erginel S. Predictors of talc pleurodesis outcome in patients with malignant pleural effusions. Lung Cancer 2008;62:139-44.

12.

12. Rafei H, Jabak S, Mina A, Tfayli A. Pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions: outcome and predictors of success. Integr Cancer Sci Ther 2015;2:216-21.

13.

13. Diacon AH, Wyser C, Bolliger CT, Tamm M, Pless M, Perruchoud AP, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of thoracoscopic talc poudrage under local anesthesia versus bleomycin instillation for pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1445-9.

14.

14. Park EH, Kim JH, Yee J, Chung JE, Seong JM, La HO, et al. Comparisons of doxycycline solution with talc slurry for chemical pleurodesis and risk factors for recurrence in South Korean patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2019;26:275-9.

15.

15. Bucknor A, Harrison-Phipps K, Davies T, Toufektzian L. Is silver nitrate an effective means of pleurodesis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;21:521-5.

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases