바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 0376-4672

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

47권 7호

근단부 성형 크기에 따른 다양한 전동 니켈티타늄 파일의 중심 변위율 및 만곡도 감소 비교

Comparison of the centering ratio and canal curvature reduction according to the apical preparation size using various NiTi rotary instruments

곽상원 (부산대학교)
박정길 (부산대학교)
허복 (부산대학교)
김현철 (부산대학교)
대한치과의사협회지 / The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, (P)0376-4672; (E)2713-7961
2009, v.47 no.7, pp.435-443
https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2009.47.7.005
곽상원, 박정길, 허복, & 김현철. (2009). 근단부 성형 크기에 따른 다양한 전동 니켈티타늄 파일의 중심 변위율 및 만곡도 감소 비교. 대한치과의사협회지, 47(7), 435-443, https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2009.47.7.005

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature according to the preparation sizes of #30, #40 and #50 using three rotary NiTi instruments which have different shaft tapers. Seventy-two simulated root canals in clear resin blocks (Endo Training Bloc; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were divided as following 3 groups according to the file system; the 24 canal blocks prepared with each of ProTaper Universal system (Group P), LightSpeed eXtra system (Group L), and K3 (Group K). The pre- and post-instrumented root canals were scanned and superimposed to evaluate and calculate the centering ratio and reduction of canal curvature. Mean scores of each group were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test for post-hoc comparison. The results were as followings: 1. Group L showed better centering ratio, followed by K and P. And all experimental groups generally showed increasing tendency of centering ratio as the apical size was increasing from #30 to #50, except at 1 mm level of group P where showed reducing tendency of centering ratio. The smaller the ratio, the better the instrument remained centered in the canal. 2. Group P showed more decrease of canal curvature at all apical shaping size (p < 0.05) Under the conditions of this study, the shaft design could affect the quality of canal shaping and the smooth taperless flexible (LightSpeed) shaft design was capable of preparing canals with good morphological characteristics in curved canals.

keywords
LightSpeed eXtra, ProTaper Universal, K3, shaft taper, centering ratio, Canal curvature

참고문헌

1.

1. Schilder H, Yee FS. Canal debridement and disinfection. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 3rd ed. St. Louis : MO Mosby 1984;175p.

2.

2. Pettiette MT, Delano EO, Trope M. Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickeltitanium hand files. J Endod 2001;27:124-127.

3.

3. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1998;14(7):346-351.

4.

4. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004;30(6):432-435.

5.

5. Chen JL, Messer HH. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique. Aust Dent J 2002;47(1):12-20.

6.

6. Garip Y, Gunday M. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2001;34(6):452-457.

7.

7. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 1995;21(3):146-151.

8.

8. K3 Endo overview. 2002. Available at: http://www.SybronEndo.com.

9.

9. Bergmans E, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 2001;14(5):324-333.

10.

10. Ayar L, Love R. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:593-601.

11.

11. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2003;36(4):288-295.

12.

12. Kim TO, Cheung GSP, Lee JM, Kim BM, Hur B, Kim HC. Stress distribution of three Ni-Ti rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis. Int Endod J 2009;42:14-21.

13.

13. Kim HC, Cheung GS, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Kang SI. Comparison of forces generated during root canal shaping and residual stresses of three nickel-titanium rotary files by using a threedimensional finite-element analysis. J Endod 2008;34(6):743-747.

14.

14. Lightspeed recommended technique guide. San Antonio, TX: Lightspeed Technology 1994.

15.

15. Thompson SA, Dummer PH. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. J Endod 1997;23(11):698-702.

16.

16. Thompson SA, Dummer PH. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. J Endod 1997;23(12):742-747.

17.

17. Portenier IF, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques. Int Endod J 1998;31(2):103-111.

18.

18. Tharuni SL, Parameswaran A, Sukumaran VG. A comparison of canal preparation using the K-file and Lightspeed in resin blocks. J Endod 1996;22(9):474-476.

19.

19. Knowles KI, Hammond NB, Biggs SG, Ibarrola JL. Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments. J Endod 2006;32(1):14-16.

20.

20. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18(2):269-296.

21.

21. Hartmann MS, Barletta FB, Camargo Fontanella VR, Vanni JR. Canal Transportation after Root Canal Instrumentation: A Comparative Study with Computed Tomography. J Endod 2007;33(8):962-965.

22.

22. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PF. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975;1(8):255-262.

23.

23. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg 1971;32:271-275.

24.

24. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis : MO Mosby 2006;306p.

25.

25. Dummer PMH, Alodeh MHA, AI-Omari MAO. A method for the construction of simulated canals in clear resin blocks. Int Endod J 1991;24(2):63-66.

26.

26. Tharuni SL, Parameswaran A, Sukumaran VG. A Comparison of Canal Preparation Using the K-File and Lightspeed in Resin Blocks. J Endod 1996;22(9):474-476.

27.

27. Griffiths IT, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickeltitanium instruments: a study in simulated canals. Int Endod J 2000;33(4):346-354.

28.

28. Thompson SA, Dummer PH. Shaping Ability of Lightspeed Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals. Part 2. J Endod 1997;23(12):742-747.

29.

29. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Bartier , Cathelineau G, Vulcain JM. Impact of torsional and bending inertia on root canal instruments. J Endod 2001;27(5):333-336.

30.

30. Thompson SA, Dummer PH. Shaping Ability of Lightspeed Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated Root Canals. Part 1. J Endod 1997;23(11):698-702.

31.

31. Barbakow F. The LightSpeed System. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(1):113-135.

32.

32. Walsch H. The hybrid concept of nickel?titanium rotary instrumentation. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(1):183-202.

logo

논문 투고
OA 정책