ISSN : 0376-4672
Prosthetic-driven implant placement is a concept considering the dental implant restoration first based on the final form of that prosthesis to be restored. The latest development of the imaging technology and digital dentistry was able to be obtained the high quality images of CBCT with low radiation exposure and it has also enabled the process to reconstruct the intraoral state in three dimensions due to the development of the intraoral, model and impression scanner. Computer-guided implant placement simulations and template production was able to be more widely used in this context. In this narrative review, the features and the types of implant surgical guides will be introduced. It will also be described the diagnosis and treatment plan using computerguided implant software to reduce the number of visit and to increase the accuracy of the implant surgery through the top-down approach based on the shape and location of the final prosthesis.
1. Edge MJ. Surgical placement guide for use with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57(6):719-22.
2. Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59(4):467-73.
3. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, Blanchet E. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 2005;21(2):298-304.
4. Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli L, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2013;42(2):264-75.
5. Moraschini V, Velloso G, Luz D, Barboza EP. Implant survival rates, marginal bone level changes, and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation with flapless computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2015.
6. Eshraghi T, McAllister N, McAllister B. Clinical applications of digital 2-D and 3-D radiography for the periodontist. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice 2012;12(3):36-45.
7. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(7):92-109.
8. Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clinical oral implants research 2013;24(6):630-34.
9. Mora MA, Chenin DL, Arce RM. Software tools and surgical guides in dental-implant-guided surgery. Dental clinics of North America 2014;58(3):597-626.
10. Russig LL, Schulze RK. Effects of minute misregistrations of prefabricated markers for image-guided dental implant surgery: an analytical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24(12):1339-46.
11. Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, N?sstr?m K, Klinge B. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2012;14(4):527-37.
12. 강세하, 정승미, 신재옥, et al. 3 차원 디지털 영상과 CAD/CAM 시스템을 활용한 전악 임플란트 수복증례. 구강회복응용과학지 2015;31(2):158-68.
