- P-ISSN 1010-0695
- E-ISSN 2288-3339
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the validity of ‘Korean Diagnosis Related Groups-Korean Medicine (KDRG-KM)’which was developed by Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) in 2013 Methods: Among inpatient EDI claim data issued by hospitals and clinics in 2012, the data which included Korean medicine procedures were selected and analyzed. We selected control targets in the Korean medicine hospitals which had longer Episodes-Costliness index (ECI) and Lengthiness index (LI) than average of total Korean medicine hospitals, and compared the results of selection between the major diagnosis-based patient classification system and the KDRG-KM system. Finally, the explanation power (R2) and coefficient of variation (CV) of the KDRG-KM system using practice expenses were calculated. Results: The numbers of control target in Korean medicine hospitals changed from 36 to 32 when patient grouping adjustment method was changed from major diagnosis to KDRG-KM. For expenses of all outpatient claim data on Korean medicine, explanation power of KDRG-KM system was 66.48% after excluding outliers. CVs of expenses of patient groups in Korean medicine hospitals were gathered from under 70% to under 90%, and those in long-term care hospitals mostly belonged under 70%. Conclusions: The validity of KDRG-KM system was assured in terms of explanation power. By adapting KDRG-KM system, fairness of control targets selection for costliness management in Korean medicine hospitals can be enhanced.
1. Kang GW, Lee EJ, Jeon YH, Kang MS, Choi MJ. Basic study for the revision of patient classification system. Health insurance review & assessment service. 2012.
2. Health insurance review & assessment service. KOPG-OM classification book. 2011.
3. Health insurance review & assessment service. Classification process of Korean medicine patient classification system. Meeting materials for 2016 1st Korean medicine patient classification system review committee. 2016.
4. Health insurance review & assessment service. Korean medicine hospital EDI claims data file. 2012.
5. Kang GW, Park HY, Shin YS. Refinement and evaluation of Korean diagnosis related groups. Health Policy and Management. 2004;14(1):122-147
6. Thomas JW, Ashcraft MLF. Measuring severity of illness: Case severity systems and their ability to explain cost variations. Inquiry. 1991;28:39-55
7. Averill RF, Muldoon JH. Vertrees JC, Goldfield NI, et al. The evolution of casemix measurement using DRGs. 3M HIS Sorking Paper. 1997:5-98.
8. Palmer G, Reid B. Evaluation of the performance of diagnosis-related groups and similar casemix systems: methodoldgical issues. Health services Management Research. 2001;14:71-81
9. Kim HS, Lee SH, Nam JM. Evaluation of the homogeneity of Korean diagnosis related groups. Health Policy and Management. 2013;23(1):44-51
10. Shin YS, Lee YS, Park HY, Yeom YK. Development and evaluation of Korea diagnosis related groups: medical service utilization of inpatients. Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;26(2):293-309
11. Wynn BO. Understanding Medicare severity -DRGs. Santa Monica(CA):RAND. 2007.