바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Between Orientalism and Ornamentalism: Colonial Perceptions of Southeast Asian Rulers: 1850-1914

Abstract

Finding distinguishing characteristics of Southeast Asia has proven to be a significant challenge: by focusing on the encounters which primarily colonial British writers had with the region’s state rulers, it becomes possible to recover the early conceptualizations of regional governance. The writings of Henry Yule, Anna Leonowens, Sir George Scott, and Hugh Clifford all document the “orientalist” features of Western discourses because these writers at once were affected by it as they contributed to it. The discourse about royalty and rulers was central to many of the tropes associated with orientalism, but also with ‘ornamentalism’. David Cannadine has shown that ornamentalism (in which British conceptualized many imperial practices in relation to their own hierarchical conceptions of society) was as critical a feature of imperial outlook as was orientalism. The need to understand ruling elites was at the heart of the imperialist project. Tracing the ways in which colonizing powers represented the region’s ruling elite offers a new avenue for recognizing the affinities of the regional experience. Beyond orientalism, the paper explores questions about the representation and * Academic Director and Professor of History, Emirates Diplomatic Academy, presentation of authority. Understanding the conceptualizations of rulers is connected to the comprehension of social organization—including representations of “traditional society.”

keywords
Royalty, Malay, Burma, Siam, Orientalism, Ornamentalism

Reference

1.

Agnew John. 1987. Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. London: Allen & Unwin.

2.

Cannadine, David. 2001. Ornamentalism: How the British Saw Their Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3.

Clifford, Hugh. 1993. At the Court of Pelesu and Other Malayan Stories. William C. Roff (editor) Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

4.

Clifford, Hugh. 1922. The Further Side of Silence. New York:Doubleday, Page and Company.

5.

Furnivall, John. 1948. Colonial Practice and Policy: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India. New York: New York University Press.

6.

Gimlette, John D. 1915. Malay Poisons and Charm Cures. London:J.& A. Churchill.

7.

Keck, Stephen L. 2016. Taking Expedience Seriously: Reinterpreting Furnivall’s Southeast Asia. Suvannabhumi, 8(1): 121-146.

8.

Leonowens, Anna. 1870. The English Governess at the Siamese Court:Being Recollection of Six Years In the Royal Palace at Bangkok. London: Trubner & Co.

9.

Mahbubani, Kishore. 1997. Can Asians Think? Singapore and Kuala Lumpur: Times Books International.

10.

Malhi, Amrita. Like a Child With Two Parents: Race, Religion and Royalty on the Siam-Malaya Frontier, 1895-1902. The Muslim World, 105(4): 472-495.

11.

Morris, Ian. 2010. Why the West Rules—For Now: The Patterns of History and What They Reveal About the Future. London:Profile Books.

12.

Peleggi, Maurizio. 2002. Lords of Things: The Fashioning of the Siamese Monarchy’s Modern Image. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

13.

Peleggi, Maurizio. 2007. Thailand: The Worldly Kingdom. London:Reaktion Books LTD.

14.

Ricklefs, M.C. 2008. A History of Modern Indonesia since c. 1200. Fourth Edition. Palgrave Macmillan.

15.

Scott, James C. 2010. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. Singapore: NUS Press.

16.

Skeat, William Walter. 1900. Malay Magic: Being An Introduction to the Folklore and Popular Religion of the Malay Peninsula. London: Macmillan and Co.

17.

Wyatt, David K. 1991. Thailand: A Short History. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.

18.

Yule, Henry (compiler).1968 (reprinted). Mission To The Court of Ava in 1855. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford university Press.

logo