open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 2092-738X
Postcolonial critics have criticized Comparative Literature for exclusively studying literatures from the non-Western world through Western lenses. In other words, postcolonial criticism asserts that theorists and practitioners of comparative literature have traced the "assistance" of the classic "comparison and contrast" approach to an imperialist discourse, which sustains the superiority of Western cultures and economies. As a countermeasure to reading through the comparative lens, literary theories have offered a "juxtapositional model of comparison" that connects texts across cultures, places, and times. This paper examines practices of Comparative Literature in Vietnam, revealing how the engagement with decolonizing processes leads to a knowledge production that is paradoxically colonial. The paper also analyses implementations of this model in reading select Vietnamese works and highlights how conventional comparisons, largely based on historical influences and reception, maintain the colonial mapping of World Literature, centralizing Western, and more particularly, English Literature and in the process marginalizing the others. Therefore, the practice of juxtaposing Vietnamese literary works with canonical works of the World Literature will provoke dialogues and raise awareness of hitherto marginalized works to an international readership. In this process, the paper considers the contemporary interest of Comparative Literature practice in trans- national, trans-regional, trans-historical, and trans-cultural perspectives.
Anderson, Deland. 1990. Through Days of Easter: Time and Narrative in The Sound and the Fury. Literature and Theology, 4(3): 311–24.
Ball, Philip. 2011. Unnatural: The Heretical Idea of Making People. London: The Bodley Head.
Bassett, J.E. 1981. Family Conflict. The Sound and the Fury. Studies in American Fiction 9(1): 1-20.
Cao, Shunqing .2007. The Construction of a New Paradigm of Comparative Literature Studies. Comparative Literature: East & West, 8 (1): 31-56.
Cao, Thị Hồng. 2013. Văn học so sánh ở Việt Nam từ 1986 đến nay. Tổ quốc. https://toquoc.vn/van-hoc-so-sanh-o-viet-nam-tu-1986-den-nay-99121123.htm (accessed March 1, 2020)
Casanova, Pascale. 2004. The World Republic of Letters. M B DeBevoise dịch. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Cheah, Pheng. 2009. The Material World of Comparison. New Literary History, 40 (3): 523–545.
Cooppan, Vilashini. 2004. Ghost in the Disciplinary Machine: The Uncanny Life of World Literature. Comparative Literature Studies, 41(1): 10-36.
Đảng cộng sản Việt Nam. 1993. Văn kiện hội nghị lần thứ tư Ban chap hành Trung ương, khóa VII [Documents of the Fourth Meeting of the Central Committee, 7th Term]. [Hà Nội]: Lưu hành nội bộ.
Den Tandt, Christophe. 2005. Pluralism and Cultural Memory. Reading Without Maps?: Cultural Landmarks in a Post-canonical Age : a Tribute to Gilbert Debusscher. Den Tandt Christophe, ed. 17-32. Brussels: Peter Lang.
Friedman, Susan Stanford. 2011. Why Not Compare? PMLA, 126(3): 753-762.
Gugelberge, Georg M. 1991. Decolonizing the Canon: Considerations of Third World Literature. New Literary History, 22(3): 505-524.
Guillory, John. 1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Felski, Rita và Susan Stanford Friedman. 2013. Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Huggan, Graham. 2001. The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins, London: NXB Routledge.
Kapek, Karel. 2004. R. U. R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots). Translated by Claudia Novack. New York: Penguin Classics.
Lê, Từ Hiển. 2017. Văn học so sánh - Từ ô cửa đến chân trời. Hanoi: Social Science Press, Hanoi.
Lưu, Quang Vũ. 2017. Tác phẩm chọn lọc. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Sân khấu.
Lưu, Văn Bổng, 2001. Văn học so sánh – Lý luận và ứng dụng. Hanoi: Social Science Press.
Lưu, Văn Bổng. 2004. Những bình diện chủ yếu của văn học so sánh. Hanoi: Social Science Press.
Lưu, Văn Bổng. 2017. Văn học so sánh - Một khoa học kết liên phức hợp. Hanoi: Social Science Press.
Mignolo, Walter. 2013. On Comparison: Who Is Comparing What and Why? Comparison: Theories, Approaches, Uses. Rita Felski and Susan Stanford Friedman, eds. 99-119. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Moraru, Christian. 2014. ‘World,’ ‘Globe,’ ‘Planet’: Comparative Literature, Planetary Studies, and Cultural Debt after the Global Turn. American Comparative Literature Association, the 2014-2015 Report on the State of the Discipline of Comparative Literature. website – Paradigms, https://stateofthediscipline.acla.org/entry/%E2%80%9Cworld%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Cglobe%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Cplanet%E2%80%9D-comparative-literature-planetary-studies-and-cultural-debt-after (accessed February 2, 2017)
Nguyễn, Văn Dân. 1995. Những vấn đề lý luận của văn học so sánh. Hanoi: Social Science Press.
Nguyễn, Văn Dân 1998. Lý luận văn học so sánh. Hanoi: Social Science Press.
Nguyễn, Văn Dân. 1999. Nghiên cứu văn học lý luận và ứng dụng. Hanoi: Hanoi University of Education Press.
Nixon, Rob. 2005. Environmentalism and Postcolonialism. Postcolonial Studies and Beyond. Ania loomba, Suvir Kaul, Matti Bunzl, Antoinette Burton, and Jed Esty, eds. 33-51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Phương Lựu. 2002. Từ văn học so sánh đến thi học so sánh. Hanoi: NXB Văn học.
Spivak, Gayatri. 2009. Rethinking Comparativism. New Literary History, 40: 609-626.
Huggan, Graham. 2001. The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins. London: NXB Routledge.
Said, Edward. 2014. Orientalism. ebook: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Thomsen, Mads Rosendahl. 2008. Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures. London: Continuum Literary Studies.
Trần Đình Sử, Lã Nhâm Thìn and Lê Lưu Oanh. 2005. Văn học so sánh nghiên cứu và triển vọng. Hanoi: Hanoi University of Education Press.
Trần Đình Sử. 2020. Cơ sở văn học so sánh. Hanoi: NXB Đại học Sư phạm.
Upstone, Sara. 2009. Spatial Politics in the Postcolonial Novel. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
Zinoman, Peter. 2014. Vietnamese Colonial Republican: The Political Vision of Vũ Trọng Phụng. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.