바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Things Fall Apart? Thailand’s Post-Colonial Politics

Abstract

This paper argues that Thailand’s internal colonial model is facing severe challenges: no longer is it so possible to suppress local and regional identities, or to submerge ethnic difference in an all-embracing but potentially suffocating blanket of “Thainess.” In recent decades, Thailand’s diverse localities have become increasingly assertive. This is most acutely the case in the insurgency-affected southern border provinces of Pattani, Yala, and Narathiwat, but also applies in the “red’ (pro-Thaksin) dominated North and Northeast. As the old ruling elite faces serious legitimacy challenges, Thailand’s emerging post-colonial politics may require a radical rethinking of the relationship between center and periphery.

keywords
Thailand, post-colonial, center, periphery, insurgency

Reference

1.

Achebe, Chinua.1962. Things Fall Apart, London: Heinemann. Also translated into Thai as ก่อนรัตติกาลจะดับสูญ [Things Fall Apart], by ลำน้ำ, กรุงเทพฯ: โครงการจัดพิมพ์คบไฟ, 2545 (Bangkok: Kobfai, 2002).

2.

Anek Laothamatas. 1996. A Tale of Two Democracies: Conflicting Perceptions of Elections and Democracy in Thailand. The Politics of Elections in Southeast Asia. Robert H. Taylor, ed. 201–23. Washington, D.C. and New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.

3.

Anek Laothamatas. 2010. รายงานสรุปฉบับผู้บริหาร โครงการวิจัยเรื่องวิเคราะห์ จุดคานงัดของประเทศไทย เพื่อฝ่าวิกฤติการณ์ สังคมเศรษฐกิจการเมืองที่ ซับซ้อน [Executive Summary: A Draft Research Project on the Analysis of the Country’s Momentum for Going Beyond Socio-Economic and Political Crisis]. Unpublished Research Report. Bangkok.

4.

Apichat Sathitniramay, Nithi Pawakapan, Yukti Mukdawijitra, Prapas Pintobdaeng, Naruemon Thabchumpon, and Wanwiphang Manachotphong. 2010. รายงานเบื้องต้นโครงการวิจัย การเปลี่ยนแป ลงด้านเศรษฐกิจและสังคมของชนชั้นใหม่, เสนอต่อสถาบันศึกษานโยบาย สาธารณะ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ [Inception Report: Research Project on Economic and Social Change of New Social classes]. Presented to the Institute for Public Policy, Chiang Mai University, June 15.

5.

Brown, David.1996. The State and Ethnic Politics in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.

6.

Chatterjee, Partha. 2011. Lineages of Political Society. New York: Columbia University Press.

7.

Connors, Michael K. 2007. Democracy and National Identity in Thailand. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.

8.

Darin Inmuean. 2012. ดันแคน แมคคาร์โก: มองการเมืองไทยจากมุมมองแบบหลั งอาณานิคม [Duncan McCargo: Looking at Thai Politics from a Post-Colonial Perspective], Fa Diao Kan, 10 (1): 20–35 [unauthorized article, based on McCargo Thammasat University lecture]

9.

Hafez, Mohammed. 2003. Why Muslims Rebel: Repression and Resistance in the Islamic World. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.

10.

Herzfeld, Michael. 2002. The Absent Pressure: Discourses of Crypto-Colonialism. South Atlantic Quarterly, 101 (4): 899–926.

11.

Jackson, Peter. 2010. The Ambiguities of Semicolonial Power in Thailand. The Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand. Peter Jackson, Rachel Harrison, eds., Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

12.

Jackson, Peter and Rachel Harrison, eds. 2010. The Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

13.

Kasian Tejapira. 2009. The Misbehaving Jeks: The Evolving Regime of Thainess and Sino-Thai Challenges. Asian Ethnicity, 10(3): 263–83.

14.

Keyes, Charles F. 2012. “Cosmopolitan” Villagers and Populist Democracy in Thailand. South East Asia Research, 20 (3): 43–60.

15.

Kilcullen, David. 2009. The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. New York: Oxford University Press.

16.

McCargo, Duncan. 2005. Network Monarchy and Legitimacy Crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review, 18 (4): 499–519.

17.

McCargo, Duncan. 2010a. Autonomy for Southern Thailand: Thinking the Unthinkable? Pacific Affairs, 83 (2): 261–81. For a Thai summary see ศูนย์เฝ้าระวังสถานการณ์ภาคใต้, โอกาสข อง Autonomy และอนาคตของ ‘เรา’, http://www.deepsouthwatch.org/node/565 (accessed April 5, 2017).

18.

McCargo, Duncan. 2010b. Thailand’s National Reconciliation Commission: A Flawed Response to the Southern Conflict. Global Change, Peace and Security, 22 (1): 75–91.

19.

McCargo, Duncan and Ayse Zarakol. 2012. Turkey and Thailand: Unlikely Twins. Journal of Democracy, 23 (1): 71–79.

20.

Matichon. 2012. “แนวร่วมแดงขี่ม้าเปิด‘อำเภอเสื้อแดง’ ที่พะเยา แกนนำแห่ลงพื้นที่ คึกคักทั้ง ‘สมชาย-เต้น-ธิดา-ตู่’,” มติชนออนไลน์, [Redshirt Movement Proclaims Red District in Phayao, Leaders Somchai, Den, Thida, Tu Make Visit to Bustling Area] 25 March, <http://www.matichon.co.th/news_detail.php?newsid=1332654490&grpid=00&catid=&subcatid=. (Accessed March 25, 2012)

21.

Montesano, Michael J. 2009. Contextualizing the Pattaya Summit Debacle: Four April Days, Four Thai Pathologies. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31, (2): 217–48.

22.

Montesano, Michael J, Pavin Chachavalpongpun, and Aekapol Chongvilaivan, eds. 2012. Bangkok, May 2010. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

23.

Montesano, Michael J. and Patrick Jory. 2008. Introduction. Thai South and Malay North: Ethnic Interactions on a Plural Peninsula. Michael J. Montesano and Patrick Jory, eds. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

24.

National Reconciliation Commission. 2006. Overcoming Violence Through the Power of Reconciliation. Bangkok: National Reconciliation Commission.

25.

Naruemon Thabchumpon and Duncan McCargo. 2011. Urbanized Villagers in The 2010 Thai Redshirt Protests: Not Just Poor Farmers? Asian Survey, 51 (6): 993–1018.

26.

Pavin Chachavalpongpun. 2010. Temple of Doom: Hysteria About the Preah Vihear Temple in the Thai Nationalist Discourse. Legitimacy Crisis in Thailand. Marc Askew, ed. 83–117. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

27.

Phrae Sirisakdamkoeng. 2009. มุสลิมชายแดนภาคใต้ในความรู้สึกของชุมชนไ ทยเสมือนจริง,” บทความประกอบงานสัมมนา “5 ปี ไฟใต้: สงคราม ความ รู้ ความสับสน แล้วไงต่อ? [The Real Feelings of the Thai Community Towards Muslims in the Southern Border Provinces], paper presented at Seminar on Five Years of the Southern Fire: War, Knowledge, Confusion and What Next? 18 January. Novotel Centara Hat Yai, Songkhla.

28.

Phrae Sirisakdamkoeng. 2012. Perspectives of Thai Citizens in Virtual Communities on the Violence in the Southernmost Provinces. Mapping National Anxieties: Thailand’s Southern Conflict. Duncan McCargo. 160–83. Copenhagen, NIAS.

29.

Streckfuss, David. 2010. Truth on Trial in Thailand: Defamation, Treason, and Lèse-Majesté, Abingdon: Routledge.

30.

Streckfuss, David. 2012. An “Ethnic” Reading of “Thai” History in the Twilight of the Century-old Official ‘Thai’ National Model. South East Asia Research, 20 (3): 305–327.

31.

Textor, Robert B. 1961. From Peasant to Pedicab Driver: A Social Study of Northeastern Thai Farmers Who Periodically Migrated to Bangkok and Became Pedicab Drivers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.

32.

Walker, Andrew. 2012. Thailand’s Political Peasants: Power in the Modern Rural Economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

logo