Women’s Unpaid Work as a Factor of Gender Inequality: A Case of Kazakhstan

Yanovskaya OLGA (the Independent Accreditation and Rating Agency)
Rajasekhara Mouly POTLURI (Al Ghurair University)
Nazyrova GULFIYA (the Professional Center for Assessment and Certifi)
Salimzhanova AIZHAN (Economics of Istanbul Technical University)

Yanovskaya, O. , Rajasekhara, M. P. , Nazyrova, G. , & Salimzhanova, A. (2020). . Asian Journal of Business Environment, 10(2), 17-21.

복사

Abstract

Purpose: This paper explores diverse issues related to the problem of women’s unpaid domestic care work, and as a factor of gender inequality in their professional practice. Research Design: This article concentrated only on the analysis of secondary data available on the topic along with observation of facts in Kazakhstan based on diverse sources. In current conditions, the problem of women's unpaid domestic care work, and consequently, the lack of enough time and energy for professional employment. Distinguish domestic work vs. job/career/occupation, selffulfillment, education, and leisure has a significant impact on women's life satisfaction. Data, and Methodology: This article focuses only on secondary data available in different sources from which the researchers procures comprehensive data and information. Results and conclusion: A family policy that aims to promote combining maternity, and domestic work with paid employment is an effective way to increase the proportion of working mothers/women. It is crucial to not only proportionally distribute the household responsibilities in the family but also to form an effective mechanism of state support for women through the development of the social services sector, as well as the adoption of a system-wide approach to gender equality.

keywords: Unpaid work, Gender policy, Labor participation, Unemployment, Gender equality.

참고문헌

Antonopoulos, R., & Hirway I. (2010). Unpaid work and the economy: Gender, time-use, and poverty in developing countries. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

Antonopoulos, R., & K. Kim. (2008). Impact of Employment Guarantee Programmes on Gender Equality and Pro-poor Economic Development. Policy Brief: Case Study on South Africa. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. January.

Apps, P., & Rees R. (2004). Fertility, taxation, and family policy. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4), 745–763.

Apps, P., & Rees R. (2005). Time use and the costs of children over the life cycle. In D. Hamermesh & G. Phann (Eds), The Economics of Time Use. London, England: Elsevier.

Asian Development Bank (2013). Country gender assessment: Kazakhstan. Retrieved September 08, 2019, from https://www.adb.org/documents/country-gender-assessmentkazakhstan

Boca, D. D., & Sauer, R. M. (2006). Life cycle employment and fertility across institutional environments (IZA Discussion Paper No. 2285). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. Retrieved September 08, 2019, from http://ftp.iza.org/dp2285.pdf

Career or family - a dilemma for a modern woman. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://site-to-you.ru/web/ref-200422.php

Human Development Report. (2016). Human development for everyone. Retrieved September 08, 2019, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_developme nt_report.pdf

Ilkkaracan I., Kim, K., & Kaya T. (2015, August). The impact of public investment in social care services on employment, gender equality, and poverty: The Turkish case. Retrieved September 08, 2019, from http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/rpr_8_15.pdf

10.

International Monetary Fund. (2013, September). Women, work, and the economy: Macroeconomic gains from gender equity. Retrieved September 08, 2019, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2013/sdn1310.pdf

11.

Nazarbayev, N. (2017, January 31). Third modernization of Kazakhstan: Global competitiveness. Retrieved September 08, 2019, from http://www.akorda.kz/en/addresses/addresses_of_president/the -president-of-kazakhstan-nursultan-nazarbayevs-address-tothe-nation-of-kazakhstan-january-31-2017

12.

OECD (2005). Babies and Bosses - Reconciling work and family life (Vol. 4). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264009295-en.

13.

OECD (2016, January 20). Multi-dimensional Review of Kazakhstan (Vol. 1). Retrieved September 08, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/publications/multi-dimensional-reviewof-kazakhstan-9789264246768-en.htm

14.

Reports of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2008). Long careers? ‘Veto’ program indicators. Retrieved September 08, 2019 from https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/74405/Selv200827.pdf?sequence=1

15.

Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men, and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.

16.

Turner, J. B. (1992). Review of workings of the household: A U.S.-U.K. comparison. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 247-249.

17.

United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (2016). Education for people and planet: creating a sustainable future for all (Global Education Monitoring Report).

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.10 No.2

Women’s Unpaid Work as a Factor of Gender Inequality: A Case of Kazakhstan

Abstract

참고문헌

Asian Journal of Business Environment