바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN2765-6934
  • E-ISSN2765-7027
  • KCI

Do Government Subsidies Crowd In or Crowd Out R&D Investment? Evidence from China’s Animal Husbandry Companies

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2020, v.10 no.4, pp.5-13
Jian XU (Qingdao Agricult ural University)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the relationship between government subsidies and research and development (R&D) investment of animal husbandry companies in China. The moderating effects of firm size, debt ratio, and firm profitability on this relationship are also examined. Research design, data and methodology: The analysis is based on 14 animal husbandry companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges over the period of 2012-2016. Data are obtained from the China Stock Market & Accounting Research (CSMAR) database and the RESSET database, and multiple regression analysis is utilized with the aid of Stata. Results: The empirical results show that government subsidies can promote R&D investment of animal husbandry companies in China. In addition, firm size, debt ratio, and firm profitability have positive moderating effects on the relationship between government subsidies and R&D investment. Conclusions: Based on the results, the paper concludes that government subsidies play an important role in the process of R&D of China’s animal husbandry companies. This paper recommends that managers of animal husbandry companies should enhance the utilization efficiency of government subsidies and put great emphasis on R&D investment. The policymakers should implement more incentives to encourage animal husbandry companies to invest more in R&D.

keywords
Government Subsidies, R&D Investment, Animal Husbandry Companies

Reference

1.

Aghion, P., Cai, J., Dewatripont, M., Du, L. S., Harrison, A., & Legros, P. (2015). Industrial policy and competition. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(4), 1-32.

2.

Almada, M. A. S., de Souza, P. C., & Laia, A. O. (2016). Application of variable costing and cost-volume-profit in the animal feed industry: a case study. Custos e Agronegocio On Line, 12(4), 72-89.

3.

Bai, Y., Song, S. Y., Jiao, J. L., & Yang, R. R. (2019). The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 819-829.

4.

Basit, S. A., Kuhn, T., & Ahmed, M. (2018). The effect of government subsidy on non-technological innovation and firm performance in the service sector: Evidence from Germany. Business Systems Research, 9(1), 118-137.

5.

Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2018). Firm size and compositions of R&D expenditures: evidence from a panel of R&D performing manufacturing firms. Industry & Innovation, 25(5), 459-481.

6.

Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., & Fier, A. (2007). The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1347-1366.

7.

Czarnitzki, D., Hottenrott, H, & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industrial research versus development investment: the implications of financial constraints. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(3), 527-544.

8.

Deng, P., Lu, H., Hong, J., Chen, Q., & Yang, Y. (2019). Government R&D subsidies, intellectual property rights protection and innovation. Chinese Management Studies, 13(2), 363-378.

9.

Feng, M. (2010). Animal husbandry listed company’s capital structure affecting factors in the empirical research. Sichuan, China: Master’s thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University.

10.

Gao, Q. J., & Zhang, C. H. (2011). Analysis of innovation capability of 125 agricultural high-tech enterprises in China. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 13(3), 278-290.

11.

Gil-Moltó, M. J., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Zikos, V. (2011). R&D subsidies, spillovers, and privatization in mixed markets. Southern Economic Journal, 78(1), 233-255.

12.

González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371-389.

13.

Guo, Y. (2018). Signal transmission mechanism of government innovation subsidy and enterprise innovation. China Industrial Economics, 36(9), 98-116.

14.

Hu, R. D., Yuan, L. Y., & Shieh, C. J. (2017). Discussion of agricultural biotechnology innovation performance with Data Envelopment Analysis. Custos e Agronegocio On Line, 13(3), 62-74.

15.

Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2005). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy, 34(9), 1385-1403.

16.

Jiang, C. L., Zhang, Y., Bu, M. L., & Liu, W. S. (2018). The effectiveness of government subsidies on manufacturing innovation: Evidence from the new energy vehicle industry in China. Sustainability, 10(6), 1692.

17.

Jin, Z. J., Shang, Y., & Xu, J. (2018). The impact of government subsidies on private R&D and firm performance: Does ownership matter in China’s manufacturing industry? Sustainability, 10(7), 2205.

18.

Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369-390.

19.

Lazzarini, S. G. (2015). Strategizing by the government:Can industrial policy create firm-level competitive advantage? Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 97-112.

20.

Lee, E. Y., & Cin, B. C. (2010). The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment:Empirical evidence from Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), 881-890.

21.

Lin, B. Q., & Luan, R. R. (2020). Are government subsidies effective in improving innovation efficiency? Based on the research of China’s wind power industry. Science of the Total Environment, 710, 136339.

22.

Ma, W. M., Zhang, R. R., & Chai, S. W. (2019). What drives green innovation? A game theoretic analysis of government subsidy and cooperation contact. Sustainability, 11(20), 5584.

23.

Majumdar, S. (2011). Scalability versus flexibility: firm size and R&D in Indian industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 101-116.

24.

Meuleman, M, & De Maeseneire, W. (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing? Research Policy, 41(3), 580-591.

25.

Mijić, K., Zekić, S., Jakšić, D., & Vuković, B. (2014). Meat industry in Serbia: performance analysis of meatprocessing and livestock companies. Custos e Agronegocio On Line, 10(3), 124-144.

26.

Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied Linear Regression Models. Homewood: Irwin.

27.

Nuintin, A. A., & Calegario, C. L . L. (2014). Analysis of the effect of the use of new technology and the specificities of agribusiness in the cost of labor during the harvest of coffee. Custos e Agronegocio On Line, 10(1), 55-73.

28.

Peng, X. J., & Lan, Y. (2018). Analysis of the effect of policy support on the performance of listed animal husbandry companies. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 61(22), 8-11.

29.

Preisinger, P. (2004). International trends in livestock breeding and the role of breeding companies. Zuchtungskunde, 76(6), 395-402.

30.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

31.

Singh, S., Kiran, R., & Goyal, D. (2015). Market share, R &D and determinants of productivity: firm based analysis of agri-biotech sector of Punjab in India. Custos e Agronegocio On Line, 11(3), 166-182.

32.

Sun, Y., & Kong, R. (2019). The relationship between diversification and earnings quality: Empirical evidence based on A shares of animal husbandry listed companies. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 62(8), 8-12.

33.

Sung, B. (2019). Do government subsidies promote firmlevel innovation? Evidence from the Korean renewable energy technology industry. Energy Policy, 132, 1333-1344.

34.

Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size?-A re-examination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34(6), 966-976.

35.

Wang, K.-H., & Liu, J.-L. (2009). The dynamic effects of government-supported R&D subsidies: An empirical study on the Taiwan Science Park. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 17(1), 1-12.

36.

Weible, D., Christoph-Schulz, I., Salamon, P., & Zander, K. (2016). Citizens’ perception of modern pig production in Germany: a mixed-method research approach. British Food Journal, 118(8), 1994-2012.

37.

Wu, A. H. (2017). The signal effect of government R&D subsidies in China: Does ownership matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 339-345.

38.

Xu, J., Liu, F., & Chen, Y.-H. (2019). R&D, advertising and firms’ financial performance in South Korea: Does firm size matter? Sustainability, 11(14), 3764.

39.

Xu, J., & Sim, J.-W. (2018). Characteristics of corporate R&D investment in emerging markets: Evidence from manufacturing industry in China and South Korea. Sustainability, 10(9), 3002.

40.

Yu, F. F., Guo, Y., Le-Nguyen, K., Barnes, S. J., & Zhang, W. T. (2016). The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energy Policy, 89, 106-113.

41.

Zhao, J. W., Guo, D. M., & Yin, C. B. (2017). Empirical research on appraisal of competitiveness of animal husbandry listed companies. Food and Nutrition in China, 23(1), 22-26.

42.

Zhu, B., & Li, L.L. (2014). An empirical analysis of the impact of public subsidies on private enterprise’s R&D investment. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 34(4), 165-186.

43.

Zhu, H. P. (2006). Firm size, market power, and the R&D behavior of non-governmental enterprises. The Journal of World Economy, 66(12), 41-52.

44.

Zhu, Z. H., Zhu, Z. W., Xu, P., & Xue, D. W. (2019). Exploring the impact of government subsidy and R&D investment on financial competitiveness of China’s new energy listed companies: An empirical study. Energy Reports, 5, 919-925.

45.

Zuniga-Vicente, J. A., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galan, J. I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36-67.

Asian Journal of Business Environment