This paper is an attempt to understand the external technology acquisition (ETA) process of the machinery SME sector in Bangalore city, India. With the onset of economic liberalization, Bangalore based machinery SMEs have significantly shifted their ETAs from India to abroad, particularly Germany and Japan, among others. The primary objective of ETAs is to enhance their competitiveness by means of improving product quality and productivity as well as meeting customer demand. Replacing outdated machinery or overcoming technological obsolescence is a primary objective of only a few. As a result, majority of the SMEs has gone for multiple ETAs since their inception and we found a statistically significant positive correlation between firm age and number of ETAs. The present study has made two empirical contributions: (i) We have thrown light on the core technology up-gradation issue - How do SMEs approach the problem of external technology acquisition in the current globalization era? (ii) We are able to identify and develop a map of ETA process based on the "learning and experiences" of these SMEs.
Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2005a) Technological innovations in small enterprises: a comparative perspective of Bangalore (India) and Northeast England (UK), Technovation, 25, 269-280.
Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2005b) Technological innovations in Indian engineering industry: industry and firm level case studies, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(5/6), 401-420.
Bala Subrahmanya, M.H. (2004) Small industry and globalization: implications, performance and prospects, Economic and Political Weekly, 34(18), 1826-1834.
Bala Subrahmanya, M.H, Mathirajan, M., Balachandra, P., Srinivasan, M.N. and Laxman P. (2002) R&D and Technological Innovations in Small Scale Industries, Allied Publishers Private Limited, New Delhi.
Bischoff, J. (2001) Technology Transfer, in Technology for Small Scale Industries: Current Status and Emerging Needs, Small Industries Development Bank of India, Lucknow, 109-133.
Daim, T.U. and Kacaoglu, D.F. (2008) Exploring technology acquisition in Oregon, Turkey and in the US electronics manufacturing companies, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19, 45-58.
Department of Industries and Commerce (2012) Bengaluru, the political capital of Karnataka and knowledge capital of India, http://www.karnatakaindustry.gov.in/ bengaluru.html
Department of Science & Technology (2010) Directory of R&D Institutions 2010, Government of India, New Delhi.
KASSIA (2012) Association affliated to KASSIA, http://www.onlinebangalore.com/ indu/kasia.html.
Koc, T. and Ceylan, C. (2007) Factors impacting the innovative capacity in large-scale companies, Technovation, 27, 105-114.
Lanctot, K. and Swan, K.C. (2000) Technology acquisition strategy in an internationally competitive environment, Journal of International Management, 6, 187-215.
Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) (2012a) Report of the Working Group on MSMEs Growth for 12th Five Year Plan (2012-2017), Government of India, New Delhi.
Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) (2012b) Annual Report 2011-12, Government of India, New Delhi.
Noori. H. (1990) Managing the Dynamics of New Technology, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Robertson, N. (1993) Technology acquisition for corporate growth, Research Technology Management, 36, 26-30.
Rogers, E.M., Takegami, S. and Yin, J. (2001) Lessons learned about technology transfer, Technovation, 21, 253-261.
Stock, G.N. and Tatikonda, M.V. (2004) External technology integration in product and process development, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24, 642-665.
Stokes, D. (1995) Small Business Management, DP Publications Ltd, London.
Tsai, K.H. and Wang, J.C. (2008) External technology acquisition and firm performance: a longitudinal study, Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 91-112.
UNDP (2001) Human Development Report 2001, Oxford University Press, New York.
Zahra, S.A., Sisodia, R. and Das, S. (1994) Domestic and international competitive focus, technology strategy and company performance: an empirical analysis, International Journal of Technology Management, 9, 172-195.