바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

한국어판 만성폐쇄성폐질환 평가테스트(CAT)와 호흡곤란-12 설문의 타당도와 신뢰도 평가

Validation of the Korean Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) and Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2010, v.69 no.3, pp.171-176
이서현 (서울아산병원)
이재승 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원)
송진우 (울산대학교)
최창민 (울산대학교)
심태선 (울산대학교)
김태범 (울산대학교)
조유숙 (울산대학교)
문희범 (울산대학교)
이상도 (울산대학교)
오연목 (울산대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Background: The object of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Korean versions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT) and Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire for patients with chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD). Methods: For the 127 COPD patients, we obtained the Korean versions of the 3 questionnaires being tested: St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), CAT, and Dyspnea-12 with spirometric measurements. To assess the validity of CAT and Dyspnea-12, their correlation with SGRQ was evaluated. To assess the reliability of CAT and Dyspnea-12, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was evaluated. Results: The mean age of patient participants was 68.6±7.5 years; 97.6% were male. The SGRQ score was correlated with the scores of the Korean version of CAT (r=0.71, p<0.0001) and Dyspnea-12 (r=0.73, p<0.0001). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the CAT and Dyspnea-12 were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. Conclusion: The Korean versions of CAT and Dyspnea-12 were shown to be valid and reliable for the Korean COPD patients.

keywords
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Validation Studies, Questionnaires, CAT, Dyspnea-12, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Validation Studies, Questionnaires, CAT, Dyspnea-12

참고문헌

1.

1. Kim DS, Kim YS, Jung KS, Chang JH, Lim CM, Lee JH,et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea: a population-based spirometry survey.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:842-7.

2.

2. Korea National Statistical Office. Korean Statistical Information Service [Internet]. Daejeon: Korea National Statistical Office; c1996- [cited 2008 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.kostat.go.kr.

3.

3. Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, Casanova C, Montes de Oca M, Mendez RA, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1005-12.

4.

4. Jones PW, Bosh TK. Quality of life changes in COPD patients treated with salmeterol. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1283-9.

5.

5. Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH,Kline Leidy N. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J 2009;34:648-54.

6.

6. Stoller JK, Ferranti R, Feinstein AR. Further specification and evaluation of a new clinical index for dyspnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;134:1129-34.

7.

7. Yorke J, Moosavi SH, Shuldham C, Jones PW. Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12. Thorax 2010;65:21-6.

8.

8. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med 1991;85 Suppl B:25-31.

9.

9. Kim YS, Byun MK, Jung WY, Jeong JH, Choi SB, Kang SM, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the St.George's Respiratory Questionnaire for patients with chronic respiratory disease. Tuberc Respir Dis 2006;61:121-8.

10.

10. Choi JK, Paek D, Lee JO. Normal predictive values of spirometry in Korean population. Tuberc Respir Dis 2005;58:230-42.

11.

11. Tu SP, McDonell MB, Spertus JA, Steele BG, Fihn SD.A new self-administered questionnaire to monitor healthrelated quality of life in patients with COPD. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP) Investigators.Chest 1997;112:614-22.

12.

12. Ferrer M, Alonso J, Prieto L, Plaza V, Monsó E, Marrades R, et al. Validity and reliability of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire after adaptation to a different language and culture: the Spanish example. Eur Respir J 1996;9:1160-6.

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases