바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

Factors Determining the Timing of Tracheostomy in Medical ICU of a Tertiary Referral Hospital

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases / Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases,
2012, v.72 no.6, pp.481-485
https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2012.72.6.481
Young Sik Park (Seoul National University)
유철규 (서울대학교)
Jinwoo Lee (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea)
이상민 (서울대학교)
임재준 (서울대학교)
김영환 (서울대학교)
한성구 (서울대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Background: Tracheostomy is a common procedure for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, the timing of tracheostomy is quite variable. This study was performed to find out the factors determining the timing of tracheostomy in medical intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Patients who were underwent tracheostomy between January 2008 and December 2009 in the medical ICU of Seoul National University Hospital were included in this retrospective study. Results: Among the 59 patients, 36 (61.0%) were male. Median Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores on the admission day were 28 and 7, respectively. The decision of tracheostomy was made on 13 days, and tracheostomy was performed on 15 days after endotracheal intubation. Of the 59 patients, 21 patients received tracheostomy before 2 weeks (group I) and 38 were underwent after 2 weeks (group II). In univariate analysis, days until the decision to perform tracheostomy (8 vs. 14.5, p<0.001), days before tracheostomy (10 vs. 18, p<0.001), time delay for tracheostomy (2.1 vs. 3.0,p<0.001), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (19.0% vs. 2.6%, p=0.049), existence of neurologic problem (38.1% vs. 7.9%, p=0.042), APACHE II scores (24 vs. 30, p=0.002), and PaO2/FiO2<300 mm Hg (61.9% vs. 91.1%, p=0.011)were different between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, APACHE II scores≥20 (odds ratio [OR], 12.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14∼136.19; p=0.039) and time delay for tracheostomy (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.11∼3.55; p=0.020) were significantly associated with tracheostomy after 2 weeks. Conclusion: APACHE II scores≥20 and time delay for tracheostomy were associated with tracheostomy after 2 weeks.

keywords
APACHE, Intensive Care Units, Time, Tracheostomy

참고문헌

1.

1. Holevar M, Dunham JC, Brautigan R, Clancy TV, Como JJ, Ebert JB, et al. Practice management guidelines for timing of tracheostomy: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. J Trauma 2009;67:870-4.

2.

2. Epstein SK. Anatomy and physiology of tracheostomy. Respir Care 2005;50:476-82.

3.

3. Rumbak MJ, Newton M, Truncale T, Schwartz SW, Adams JW, Hazard PB. A prospective, randomized, study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1689-94.

4.

4. Zagli G, Linden M, Spina R, Bonizzoli M, Cianchi G, Anichini V, et al. Early tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a retrospective study of 506 cases of video-guided Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomies. J Trauma 2010;68: 367-72.

5.

5. Terragni PP, Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Faggiano C, Berardino M, Pallavicini FB, et al. Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;303:1483-9.

6.

6. Dunham CM, LaMonica C. Prolonged tracheal intubation in the trauma patient. J Trauma 1984;24:120-4.

7.

7. Kluge S, Baumann HJ, Maier C, Klose H, Meyer A, Nierhaus A, et al. Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a nationwide survey. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1639- 43.

8.

8. Blot F, Melot C; Commission d'Epidémiologie et de Recherche Clinique. Indications, timing, and techniques of tracheostomy in 152 French ICUs. Chest 2005;127: 1347-52.

9.

9. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/ failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis- Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707- 10.

10.

10. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-29.

11.

11. Plummer AL, Gracey DR. Consensus conference on artificial airways in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 1989;96:178-80.

12.

12. Freeman BD, Borecki IB, Coopersmith CM, Buchman TG. Relationship between tracheostomy timing and duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2513-20.

13.

13. Scales DC, Thiruchelvam D, Kiss A, Redelmeier DA. The effect of tracheostomy timing during critical illness on long-term survival. Crit Care Med 2008;36:2547-57.

14.

14. Durbin CG Jr, Perkins MP, Moores LK. Should tracheostomy be performed as early as 72 hours in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation? Respir Care 2010;55:76-87.

15.

15. Freeman BD, Kennedy C, Robertson TE, Coopersmith CM, Schallom M, Sona C, et al. Tracheostomy protocol: experience with development and potential utility. Crit Care Med 2008;36:1742-8.

Tuberculosis & Respiratory Diseases