ISSN : 0376-4672
We describes the process of 3D virtual treatment planning and of CAD/CAM for surgical splint in orthognathic surgery. The potential benefits and disadvantages of 3D virtual approach and the use of CAD/CAM system for the treatment of the patient with a maxillofacial deformity are discussed. For the more convenient applications,3D software should be improved.
Distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgery are the widely used surgical methods for treating hemifacial microsomia and cleft lip and palate, the representative forms of congenital deformity. Distraction osteogenesis is an outstanding treatment of choice when more traction is needed than what can be achieved by general orthognathic surgery. However, the stability of distraction osteogenesis has not yet been established, and in most of the cases, additional orthognathic surgery is mandatory. Moreover, the difficulty in precise control of the traction directions is another disadvantage of distraction osteogenesis. Therefore,it would be desirable not to conduct distraction osteogenesis when the patient is suitable for an orthognathic surgery. Also,distraction osteogenesis should be recognized as an accessorial method of treatment, and be used restrictively.
Orthognathic surgery(2-jaw or 1-jaw surgery) is very famous one of cosmetic techniques. However, primary purpose of orthognathic surgery is to improve the occlusion of jaw and secondary purpose is to improve the esthetic result. Unfortunately, many patients don’t only confuse often primary and secondary purpose of orthognathic surgery but they think the esthetic result is more important than the occlusion. Therefore, oral and maxillofacial surgeon has to fully understand cosmetic needs of patient and reflect that in the treatment plan. Patients with prominent mandibular angle want to have the narrower face of so called ‘V-line’ shape. Various techniques like the angle shaving, ostectomy of the lateral cortex around the mandibular angle and masseter musclectomy can be used for improving the mandibular angle hypertrophy. These techniques also can be applied in orthognathic surgery at the same time. We operated patients of orthognathic surgery, especially, with wide lower face and post-operative results were satisfactory in all cases. So, we propose mandibular angle management for improving the esthetic result of orthognathic surgery.
Surgery first approach in orthognathic surgery is to proceed the orthognathic surgery without preoperative orthodontic treatment. This approach has many advantages, which include a shorter total treatment period, a high level of patient satisfaction due to immediate post-surgical facial improvement, easy postoperative orthodontic treatment due to early normalization of skeletal muscle, and the rapid tooth movement reflecting the regional accelerated phenomenon. However instability due to transient occlusal interference after surgery make worse of long-term skeletal stability. Especially increasing of vertical occlusion caused by interference of interbicupid and molar happen postsurgical skeletal change. Until now, there is no common consensus about treatment protocol of surgery first approach in orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this paper is to introduce our treatment protocol of the surgery first approach and to evaluate indication and limitation with case analysis.
