바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

이동형 구내방사선촬영기로 촬영한 치근단 방사선촬영과 파노라마방사선촬영의 흡수선량과 유효선량 평가

A absorbed and effective dose from the full-mouth periapical radiography using portable dental x-ray machine and panoramic radiography

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to measure the absorbed dose and to calculate the effective dose for full-mouth periapical radiography using the portable dental x-ray machine and panoramic radiography Material and Method : Thermoluminescent chips were placed at 25sites throughout the layers of the head and neck of a tissueequivalent human skull phantom. The man phantom was exposed with the portable dental x-ray machine and panoramic unit. During full-mouth periapical radiography the exposure setting was 60 kVp, 2 mA and 0.15 ~ 0.25 seconds, while during panoramic radiography the selected exposure setting was 72 kVp, 8 mA and 18 seconds. Absorbed dose measurements were obtained and equivalent doses to individual organs were summed using ICRP 103 to calculate of effective dose. Result : In the full-mouth periapical radiography, the highest absorbed dose was recorded at the mandible body follow with submandibular glands and cheek. Using panoramic unit, the highest absorbed dose was parotid glands and the following was back of neck and submandibular glands. The effective dose in full-mouth periapical radiography using portable dental x-ray machine was 46 Sv. In panoramic radiography, the effective dose was 38 Sv. Conclusion : It was recommended to panoramic radiography for general check in the head and neck area because that the effect dose in the panoramic radiography was lower than the dose in the full-mouth periapical radiography using portable dental x-ray machine.

keywords
Thermoluminescent dosimetry, Radiography, Dental, Digital, Radiography, Panoramic

참고문헌

1.

1. 대한구강악안면방사선학교수협의회. 영상치의학. 제4판. 나래출판사. p165. 2008.

2.

2. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 6th edition. Mosby. 2008

3.

3. 2007년 국제방사선방호위원회 권고. ICRP 간행물 103. 대한방사선방어학회

4.

4. Coy J, Vandre RH, Davidson WR. Use of the handheld dental X-ray machine during joint operation, NATO exercise display determination-92. Mil Med 1997:162;575-577.

5.

5. Varghese S, Kimmel A, Radmer T, Bradley TG, Bahcall J. In vitro evaluation of the XR-15 portable x-ray unit for forensic odontology. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2004;22:5-8.

6.

6. Kenneth PH, Stanley SJ, Mackernzie AJ. Radiation safty for the NOMAD™ portable X-ray system in a temporary morgue setting. J Forensic Sci 2008;53: 917-921.

7.

7. DG Charlton. Portable dental equipment: dental units and x-ray equipment. Gen Dent 2009;57:336-341.

8.

8. Kim EK. Effect of the amount of battery charge on tube voltage in different hand-held dental x-ray systems. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;42:1-4.

9.

9. Lee W. Current status of medical radiation exposure and regulation efforts. J Korean Med Assoc 2011;54:1248-1252.

10.

10. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-226.

11.

11. Avendanio B, Fredericksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from detailed narrow beam radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:713-719.

12.

12. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging device: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-234.

13.

13. Van Dis ML, Miles DA, Parks ET, Razmus TF. Information yield from a hand-held dental x-ray unit. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;7:381-385.

14.

14. 김은경. 이동용 치과 X선 발생장치의 누설 및 산란선량에 관한 연구. 대한구강악안면방사선학회지 2007;37:65-68.

15.

15. 조정연, 한원정, 김은경. 이동형 구내방사선촬영기로 촬영한 치근단 방사선사진의 흡수선량과 유효 선량 평가 . 대한구강악안면방사선학회지 2007;37:149-156.

16.

16. 최순철, 최항문. 전악치근단방사선사진촬영, 파노라마방사선사진촬영 및 협각단층촬영시의 흡수선량. 대한구강악안면방사선학회지 1999;29:255-260.

17.

17. Underhill TE, Chilvarquer I, Kimura K, Lanlais RP, McDavid D, Preece JW, Barnwell G. Radiobiologic risk estimation from dental radiology. Part I. absorbed doses to critical organs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:111-120.

18.

18. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations. The impact of 2007 international commission on radiological protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. JADA 2008;139:1237-1247.

19.

19. Gavala S, Donta C, Tsiklakis K, Boziari A, Kamenopoulou V, Stamatakis HC. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:42-48.

20.

20. Danforth RA, Clark DE. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Otal Radiol Endod 2000;89:236-243.

logo