How can improve the insufficient success rate at immediate loading?

A titanium based screw shaped dental implant was first introduced by Branemark and a treatment protocol where the restoration of edentulous area by connecting abutment after the osseointegration of the titanium surface of the implant and surrounding bone structure has been proposed. Although this protocol is widely accepted as a standard up to date, the healing duration of 3-6 months as well as the need for provisional prostheses during this period present as a major drawback. Immediate loading has been accomplished through the advent of various implant designs, enforced surface treatments, diverse forms of abutment, and delicate surgical techniques together with the increase in demand from the patients. The success rate of the immediate loading technique has been first reported as 85.7% by Dr. Schnitman in 1990 which recently has been reported up to 100% in the case of immediate loading in single tooth by Dr. Kan. To ameliorate the success rate of immediate loading technique, selection of patients presenting a sound bone quality and quantity, acquiring primary stability through delicate surgical techniques and fabrication of prostheses which accounts for biological stabilities should all be taken into consideration. This presentation introduces the understanding of biological stability of immediate loading, various methods for measurement of stability and clinical cases regarding immediate loading technique..

keywords: Dental implants, Immediate loading, Implant stability, Progressive loading

참고문헌

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.

2. Schnitman PA, Wohrle PS, Rubenstein JE. Immediate fixed interim prostheses supported by two-stage threaded implants: Methodology and results. J Oral Implantol 1990; 16:96-105.

3. Grunder U, Polizzi G, Goene R, et al. A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1999;142:210-216.

4. Chaushu G, Chaushu S. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants: Immediate versus non immediate implantation. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofacial implants 2001;16:267-272.

5. Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N. Branemark single tooth implants : A preliminary report or 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:274-279.

6. Andersen E, Haas HR. Immediate loading of singletooth ITI implants in the anterior maxilla: A prospective 5-year pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:281-287.

7. Kan YK, Rungcharassaeng K. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants : 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:31-39.

8. Albrektsson T, Eriksson AR, Friberg B, Lekholm U, Lindahl L, Nevins M, Oikarinen V, Roos J, Sennerby L, Astrand P. Histologic investigations on 33 retrieved Nobelpharma implants. Clin Mater. 1993;12(1):1-9.

9. Caulier H, Naert I, Kalk W, Jansen JA. The relationship of some histologic parameters, radiographic evaluations, and Periotest measurements of oral implants: an experimental animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(3):380-6.

10.

10. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants.Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111.

11.

11. Johansson CB, Sennerby L, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:437-441.

12.

12. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-267.

13.

13. Friberg B, Sennerby L,Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303.

14.

14. Olive J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:390-400.

15.

15. Walker L, Morris HF, Ochi S. Periotest values of dental implants in the first 2 years after secondstage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 8. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. Implant Dent 1997;6:207-212.

16.

16. 염지훈, 곽옥기, 황석현, 전상호, 최연조, 권종진.즉시하중시 임시 보철물 단위에 따른 임프란트주위 골형성 및 안정도 변화. 대한치과이식(임프란트)학회지 2011;30(1):27-36

17.

17. Brunski JB. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micro motion of intraosseous implants. Dent Implantol Update. 1993;4(10):77-81.

18.

18. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(2):120-7.

19.

19. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(208):108-13.

20.

20. J. Wolff. The Law of Bone Remodeling, Springer (1986) (Trans. Maquet, P., Furlong, R.).

21.

21. R.E. Marx, J.E. Cillo Jr, J.J. Ulloa. Oral bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis: Risk factors, prediction of risk using serum CTX testing, prevention, and treatment J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65 (2007), p. 2397

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

51권 4호

Immediate loading 부족한 성공률 5% 채우기

How can improve the insufficient success rate at immediate loading?

Abstract

참고문헌