open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
An overall reduction in the horizontal and vertical dimensions occurs following tooth extraction and the resorption of the buccal part of the ridge is more pronounced than the lingual part. Thus, the resulting morphology of the healed alveolar ridge is often presenting with a discrepancy in bone height between the buccal and lingual aspects of the ridge. The implant with a sloped marginal configuration that is designed to match the sloped contour of the alveolar ridge provides the opportunity to maintain the buccal-lingual bone discrepancy and soft tissue around the implant. This paper introduces the OsseoSpeed TX Profile implants with sloped marginal configuration and explains the characteristics and clinical meanings of those implants.
1) Schropp, L., Wenzel, A., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2003;23:313-323.
2) Araujo, M.G. & Lindhe, J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2005;32:212?218.
3) Araujo, M.G., Sukekava, F., Wennstrom, J.L. &Lindhe, J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2005;32:645?652.
4) Araujo, M.G., Wennstrom, J.L. & Lindhe, J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006;17:606?614.
5) Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T. & Lindhe, J. Hardtissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2004;31:820?828.
6) Sanz, M., Cecchinato, D., Ferrus, J., Pjetursson, E.B., Lang, N.P. & Lindhe, J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2010;21:13?21.
7) Nowzari, H., Chee, W., Yi, K., Pak, M., Chung, W.H. & Rich, S. Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfect implants in 6patients. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2006;8:1?10.
8) Khraisat, A., Zembic, A., Jung, R.E., Hammerle, C.H.F. Marginal bone levels and soft tissue conditions around single-tooth implants with a scalloped neck design: Results of a prospective 3-year study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:550?555. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2544
9) Abrahamsson, I., Welander, M., Linder, E. &Berglundh, T. Healing at implants placed in an alveolar ridge with a sloped configuration. An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00460.x
10) Noelken, R., Donati, M., Fiorellini, J., Gellrich, N.C., Parker W., Wada K., Berglundh T. Soft and hard tissue alterations around implants placed in an alveolar ridge with a sloped configuration Clinical Oral Implants Research 2014;25:3?9.
11) Holmstrom, J. Fatigue strength of OsseoSpeed™4.0S (M1.6) and MicroThread™ OsseoSpeed™4.0 (M2)- a comparative study. Poster. 2008Astra Tech AB.
12) Johansson, H., Hellqvist, J. Functionality of a further developed implant system-- Mechanical integrity. Poster 2014 EAO.
13) Rasmusson, L., Roos, J., Bystedt, H. A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Titanium Dioxide?Blasted Implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2005;7:36-42
14) Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T., Buser, D., Lindhe, J. The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003Feb;14(1):35-42.
15) Kim, K.S., Lim, Y.J., Kim, M.J., Kwon, H.B., Yang, J.H., Lee, J.B., Yim, S.H. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection, Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:834-839.