open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
This clinical report presents conservative and esthetic ceramic veneer treatments without tooth reduction. Patients' benefit from avoiding invasive procedure is discussed in terms of biologic price. The margin is placed not only at the cervical area, but also at any place on the tooth where additive volume increase is required. Techniques to camouflage the margin is described where contact lens effect is difficult to achieve. Proper case selection would be imperative to avoid periodontally hazardous restoration.
1. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-9.
2. Zarb GA, MacKay HF. The partially edentulous patient. I. The biologic price of prosthodontic intervention. Aust Dent J 1980;25:63-8.
3. Gresnigt M, Ozcan M, Kalk W. Esthetic rehabilitation of worn anterior teeth with thin porcelain laminate veneers. Eur J Esthet Dent 2011;6:298-313.
4. Nosti J. "Thin is in" the art of minimal & no prep veneer. J N J Dent Assoc 2009;80:30.
5. Radz GM. Minimum thickness anterior porcelain restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:353-70.
6. Wells D. Low-risk dentistry using additive-only ("no-prep") porcelain veneers. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:50-5.
7. Lowe RA. No-prep veneers: a realistic option. Dent Today 2010;29:80.
8. da Cunha LF, Pedroche LO, Gonzaga CC, Furuse AY. Esthetic, occlusal, and periodontal rehabilitation of anterior teeth with minimum thickness porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1315-18.
9. Hedge TK. Minimal prep veneers: a conservative alternative. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2008;20:475.
10. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company; 2002. p. 335-70.
11. Reshad M, Geller W, Cascione D. An Ultraconservative approach to porcelain veneers in the 21st century. Quintessence Dent Technol 2011;34:193
12. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995;11:103-10.
13. Friedman MJ. Augmenting restorative dentistry with porcelain veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:29-34.
14. Materdomini D, Friedman MJ. The contact lens effect: enhancing porcelain veneer esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent 1995;7:99-103.
15. Wells DJ. "No-prep” veneers. Inside Dent 2010;6:56-60.
16. Layton DM, Clarke M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:111-24.
17. Layton DM. Clarke M, Walton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:590-603.
18. Ge C, Green CC, Sederstrom D, McLaren EA, White SN. Effect of porcelain and enamel thickness on porcelain veneer failure loads in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:380-7.
19. Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita MA, Coachman C, Morimoto S. Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:31-9.