open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Orthognathic surgery is designed to correct problems of the jaw and face and restore facial harmony. The limitations of orthognathic surgery occur at all steps of the surgical workflow: preoperative planning, simulation, and operation. Many studies have shown the accuracy and advantages of 3 dimensional computer-assisted program for orthognathic surgery. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the accuracy of the maxillary repositioning in patients who underwent orthognathic surgery using a 3 dimensional computer assisted surgery program. The reliability of computer guided orthognathic surgery using splint and surgical guide need to be improved further. The 3 dimensional computer assisted analysis seems to be more precise to interpret than twodimensional analysis. High-precision planning of orthognathic surgery has predictable results. Three-dimensional computer assisted orthognathic surgery has the following advantages : planned surgical movement is possible, splints guide with CAD/CAM technology; and increase predictable results .Computer assisted simulation surgery ensures accuracy during surgery, thereby facilitating predictable results. It may provide solution that enables surgeon to perform planned surgery more accurately.
1. Kwon, T.G., Accuracy and reliability of threedimensional computer-assisted planning for orthognathic surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018. 40(1): p. 14.
2. Kim, J.W., et al., The accuracy and stability of the maxillary position after orthognathic surgery using a novel computer-aided surgical simulation system. BMC Oral Health, 2019. 19(1): p. 18.
3. Heufelder, M., et al., Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017. 45(9): p. 1578-1585.
4. Van Hemelen, G., et al., Three-dimensional virtual planning in orthognathic surgery enhances the accuracy of soft tissue prediction. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2015. 43(6): p. 918-925.
5. Stokbro, K., et al., Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014. 43(8): p. 957-65.
6. Zinser, M.J., et al., Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: feasibility study using multiple CAD/CAM surgical splints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012. 113(5): p. 673-87.
7. Troulis, M.J., et al., Development of a threedimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002. 31(4): p. 349-57.
8. Zhou, L.B., et al., Accurate reconstruction of discontinuous mandible using a reverse enginee ring/computer-aided design/rapid prototyping technique: a preliminary clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010. 68(9): p. 2115-21.
9. Santler, G., 3-D COSMOS: a new 3-D model based computerised operation simulation and navigation system. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2000. 28(5): p. 287-93.
10. Xia, J., et al., Three-dimensional virtual reality surgical planning and simulation workbench for orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 2000. 15(4): p. 265-82.
11. Xia, J., et al., Computer-assisted threedimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000. 29(1): p. 11-7.
12. Olszewski, R., K. Tranduy, and H. Reychler, Innovative procedure for computer-assisted genioplasty: three-dimensional cephalometry, rapid-prototyping model and surgical splint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010. 39(7): p. 721-4.
13. Xia, J., et al., Three-dimensional virtual-reality surgical planning and soft-tissue prediction for orthognathic surgery. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, 2001. 5(2): p. 97-107.