open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Objectives: This study aimed to measure the water sorption / solubility of Biodentine, composite resin and glass ionomer cement. Materials and Methods: The materials used in this study were Biodentine(BD), Filtek Z250(FZ) and Ketac Molar(KM). Twenty disc-shaped specimens of each material were prepared of 6mm diameter and 1mm thickness. All specimens were desiccated for 24 hours and weighed(m1). After then, They were immersed in distilled water and stored at 37°C. 1 week later, They were washed with running water, wiped with absorbent paper and weighed(m2). Finally, They were dried for 24 hours and weighed(m3). Water sorption and solubility, net water uptake were calculated. Results: KM and BD showed high water sorption than FZ(P<0.05). KM and BD exhibited similar water sorption(P<0.05). BD exhibited high solubility than KM(P=0.012). BD exhibited high net water uptake than FZ(P=0.008). Conclusion: Biodentine showed higher water sorption, solubility and net water uptake than Filtek Z250 and Ketac Molar. Within limitation of this study, it is not recommended to use Biodentine for permanent restoration.
1. Gibbons RJ. Bacteriology of dental caries. J Dent Res. 1964;43;1021. DOI: 10.1177/ 00220345640430060301.
2. Septodont : BiodentineⓇ- Bioactive Dentin Substitute. Available from URL: http://www.septodontusa.com/products/biodentine(AccessedonSeptember20,2017).
3. Arora V, Nikhil V, Sharma N, & Arora P. Bioactive dentin replacement. J Dent Med Sci, 2013;12;51-57.
4. Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin J. C, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure M. O, Lambert G. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth-a prospective study. Clinical oral investigations, 2013;17;243-249. DOI:10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9
5. Kumar N, Sangi L. Water sorption, solubility, and resultant change in strength among three resin-based dental composites. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2014;5;144-150. DOI:10.1111/jicd.12012
6. Mustafa R, Alshali R. Z, Silikas N. The effect of desiccation on water sorption, solubility and hygroscopic volumetric expansion of dentine replacement materials. Dental Materials. 2018;34;205-213. DOI:10.1016/j.dental. 2018.05.012.
7. Aliping-McKenzie M, Linden R W. A, Nicholson J. W. The effect of saliva on surface hardness and water sorption of glass-ionomers and “compomers”. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2003;14;869-873.
8. Moshaverinia A, Ansari S, Roohpour N, Reshad M, Schricker S. R, Chee W. W. Effects of N-vinylcaprolactam containing polyelectrolytes on hardness, fluoride release and water sorption of conventional glass ionomers. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2011;105;323-331.
9. International Organization for Standardization(2000). ISO 4049: Dentistry-Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials, 3rded.
10. Malkondu O, Kazandag M. K, Kazazoglu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. BioMed research international, 2014;2014:160951. DOI: 10.1155/2014/160951.
11. Grech L, Mallia B, Camilleri, J. Investigation of the physical properties of tricalcium silicate cement-based root-end filling materials. Dental Materials, 2013;29;20-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental. 2012.11.007.