Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1010-0695
  • E-ISSN 2288-3339

The Relationships among Trunk Control Ability, Dynamic Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients

Journal of Korean Medicine / Journal of Korean Medicine, (P)1010-0695; (E)2288-3339
2012, v.33 no.1, pp.148-159




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the correlation among Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), Timed "Up and Go" Test (TUG) and gait (velocity, cadence, step-length, stride-length and single-limb support). Methods: The 70 subjects were assessed on trunk control measured with the use of the PASS, dynamic balance (TUG)and gait function (by GAITRite). The data were analyzed using Pearson product correlation. Results: The PASS total scores were significantly correlated with PASS-M, PASS-C, and PASS-T (r =.80 ~ .88 p<.01). All items of the PASS were significantly correlated with TUG (r = -.63 ~ -.81 p<.01), velocity (r = .44~.58 p<.01),cadence (r =.38 ~.51. p<.01), affected side step length (r = .44 ~.56 p<.01) and affected side stride length (r = .45 ~.59p<.01). But affected side single-limb support was lowly correlated with PASS-M, PASS-C, PASS-T and PASS-total (r = .25~.36 p<.05). Conclusions: Measures of trunk control were significantly related with values of dynamic balance and gait. Based on these results, trunk control is an essential core component of balance and gait. Trunk control training programs after stroke should be developed and emphasized.

keywords
stroke, PASS, trunk control, balance, gait


Reference

1

1. Ryrson S, Levit K. Functional movement reeduction. NewYork: Churchill Livingstone. 1997.

2

2. National Statistical Office. Annual report on the cause of death statistics. 2009.

3

3. Mercier L, Audet T, Hebert R, Rochette A, & Dubois MF. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(11):2602-2608.

4

4. Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Tabatabaei R, Ekuklu G, & Kokino S. Cognitive evaluation and functional outcome after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabili. 2001;80(6): 410-415.

5

5. Duncan P, Horner R, Reker D, Samsa G, Hoenig H, & Hamilton B. et al. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(1): 167-177.

6

6. Ikai T, Kamikubo T, & Takenhara I. Dynamic Postural Control in Patients with hemiparesis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(6):463-9.

7

7. Campbell FM, Ashburn AM, Pickering RM, & Burnett M. Head and pelvic movements during a dynamic reaching task in sitting: implications for physical therapists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(12):1655-1660.

8

8. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley A, & Tallis RC. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86(1):30-38.

9

9. Ragnarsdottir M. The concept of balance. Physiotherapy. 1996;82(6)368-375.

10

10. Dietz V. Human neuronal control of automatic functional movement: Interaction between central programmes and afferent input. Physiological Reviews. 1992;72(1): 33-69.

11

11. Johansson R, & Maqnuson M. Human postural dynamics. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 1991;18(6):413-437.

12

12. Dean CM, & Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1997;28(4):722-728.

13

13. Davies PM. Right in the Middle: Selective trunk activity in the treatment of adult hemiplegia. Springer Verlag, Berlin. 1990.

14

14. Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. Heinemann, London. 2nd ed. utterworth/heinemann;1990.

15

15. Davies PM. Steps to Follow. Springer Verlag, Berlin. 1985.

16

16. Ashbum A, & Lynch M. Disadvantages of the early use of wheelchairs in the treatment of hemiplegia. Clin Rehabil. 1998;2:327-331.

17

17. Van der LEE JH, Snels IAK, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:20-31.

18

18. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJM, Van der Wees PhJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical theapy on fuctional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-62.

19

19. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke - a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25: 479-89.

20

20. Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, Hsueh IP, Wang CH. Trunk control as an early predictor of comprehensive activities of daily living function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:2626-30.

21

21. Partridge CJ, Johnston M & Edwards S. Recovery from disability after stroke: Normal patterns as a basis for evaluation. Lancet. February 14. 1987;373-375.

22

22. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, van de Winckel A, De Weerdt W. Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2007b;21(5):387-394.

23

23. Benaim C, Perennou DA, Villy J, Rousseaux M, Pelissier JY. Validation of a standardized assessment of postual control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS). Stroke. 1999;30(9):1862-8.

24

24. Saeys W, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Lafosse C, Wuyte FP, Van de Heyning P. Randomized Controlled Trial of Truncal Exercises Early After Stroke to Improve Balance and Mobility. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;Aug 15.

25

25. Duarte E, Morales A, Pou M, Aquirrezabal A, Aquilar JJ, Escalada F. Trunk control test: early predictor of gait balance and capacity at 6 months of the stroke. Neurologia. 2009;24(5):297-303.

26

26. Di Monaco M, Trucco M, Di Monaco R, Tappero R, Cavanna A. The relationship beetween initial trunk control or postural balance and inpatient rehabilitation outcome after stroke: a prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(6):543- 54.

27

27. An SH, Chung YJ, Park SY. The Effects of Trunk Control Ability on Balance, Gait, and Functional Performance Ability in Patients With Stroke. Journal of the Korean Academy of University Trained Physical Therapists. 2010;17 (2):33-42.

28

28. Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1991;39 (2):142-8.

29

29. McDonough, AL, Batavia M, Chen FC, Kwon S, & Ziai J. The validity and reliability of the GAIT Rite system's measurements: A preliminary evaluation. arch phys med rehabil. 2001;82(3): 419-425.

30

30. Van Uden CJ, & Besser MP. (2004). Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system(GAIT Rite). BMC musculoskelet disord. 2004;17(5):13.

31

31. Davies PM. Right in the middle: selective trunk activity in the treatment of adult hemiplegia. 2nd ed. Berlin;New York: Springer-Verlag;1990.

32

32. Brosseau L. Philippe P, Potvin L, Boulanger YL. Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. I. Prediction length of stay. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 75:422-30.

33

33. Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Ricupero C, Martino MT. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke. 1997;28: 1382-5.

34

34. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33:1002-7.

35

35. Duate E, Marco E, Muniesa JM, Belmonte R, Diaz P, Tejero M, et al. Trunk control test as a functional predictor in stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(6):267-72.

36

36. Bebte G. The Bobath Concept in Adult Neurology. Georg Thieme Verlag. 2008.

상단으로 이동

Journal of Korean Medicine