ISSN : 1229-0076
and general categories. The stories individual Koreans tell can offerdiverse lenses and perspectives to us viewing in and out of the broad conceptsand categories of the schema that has been used to describe religions in Korea.As here and elsewhere, we should be aware that our established habits of classi-fication lead us fairly often to apply an old scheme when the case it is applied tois new, even when the case does call for us to devise a novel way of understand-ing. Taking a closer look at stories, or cases is one of the few ways available forus to go beyond our entrenched scheme of concepts and categories.7
Augustine, (1998) The Confessions.Translated by Henry Chadwick, Oxford University Press.
Baker, Donald, (1999) Different Thread: Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and Catholicism in a Confucian World.InCulture and the State in Late Choson, Harvard University Press.
Fish, Stanley. , (1999) ust Published: Minutiae Without Meaning[a critique of biography and biographical narratives,
Flanagan, Owen. , (2002) The Problem of the Soul: Two Visions of Mind and How to Reconcile Them, Basic Books.
Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking.Indianapolis Hackett Publishing Company. 124 The Review of Korean Studies 7. I learned this historicist way of doing philosophy aking a look from the Canadian philosopher Ian Hacking’s project of ‘historical ontology’. See Hacking 2002, Harvard University Press.
Hirstein, William, (2006) Brain Fiction: Self-Deception and the Riddle of Confabulation, MIT Press.
Hoffman, Curtis, (2001) The Seven Story Tower: A Mythic Journey Through Space and Time, Perseus Publishing.
Kendall, Laurel. 1988. The Life and Hard Times of a Korean Shaman Of Tales and the Telling of Tales.Honolulu University of Hawaii Press.,
Lancaster, Lewis R, (1997) Religion and Society in Contemporary Korea, University of California Press
Modell, Arnold, (2003) Imagination and the Meaningful Brain, MIT Press
Nisbett, Richard E, (2003) The Geography of Thought,