바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

  • P-ISSN1229-0076
  • E-ISSN2773-9351
  • SCOPUS, ESCI

The Beautiful, the Lame, and the Weird: Three Types of Colonial Heroes in Contemporary Korean Films

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2012, v.15 no.2, pp.7-32
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2012.15.2.001

Abstract

Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, films based on the colonial period have consistently been produced due to two forces generated in the latter half of the ’90s. One is the flow within the humanities to reconstitute the colonial period with a perspective of cultural modernization spreading out to mass culture, and the other comes from the tendency to creatively narrate the national trauma that was evoked by the IMF crisis in Hollywood-style big-budget action blockbuster films. This paper considers the male hero of a colonized Korea in three different ways: as the de-ideologized hero who shares victimhood with the male hero of the Japanese empire in a buddy-double relationship, as an independence activist caricatured anachronistically for rigidly adhering to ideology, and as a superhero who becomes the imaginative winner through the grammar of genre films. In post-authoritarian Korea, where de-ideologization and survivalism is prevalent while the incomplete task of decolonization is still at hand, these characters are meaningful as still-advancing figures in a state of potentiality, which reflect the public sentiment that recalls the colonial period with an ambivalence that includes both visual pleasure and historical indebtedness.

keywords
Colonial period, male hero, laughter, authenticity, IMF crisis

Reference

1.

An, Sihwan. 2012. “Mai wei: Asian beulokbeosteo, hogeun mugukjeok meulokbeosteo” [My Way: Asian Blockbuster, or Stateless Blockbuster]. Cine21 835. January 5. http://www.cine21.com/news/view/mag_id/68604.

2.

Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Translated by Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review Press.

3.

Bae, Gyeong-min. 2009. “Singminji sidae, daejungmunhwa ui gamyeon eul sseuda” [Colonial Period, Masquerade of Popular Culture]. Hanguk Eoneo Munhwa 38:27-41.

4.

Baek, Moonim. 2006. “Choegeun Hanguk yeonghwa ui teurauma sangtae: Tekeunoloji wa wonhan” [The Traumatic Status of Recent Korean Films: Technology and Ressentiment]. In Hanguk yeonghwa ui mihak gwa yeoksajeok sangsangnyeok [The Aesthetics and Historical Imagination of Korean Cinema], edited by Yonsei Institute of Media Arts, 75-92. Seoul: Sodo Publishing.

5.

Bergson, Henry. (1899 in French) 2009. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. B’ham Press. XML e-book.

6.

Berry, Chris. 2003. “What’s Big about the Big Film?” In Movie Blockbusters, edited by Julian Stringer. London: Routledge.

7.

Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. “Narrating the Nation.” In Nation and Narration, edited by Homi K. Bhaba, 1-7. London: Routledge.

8.

Choi, Jinhee. 2010. The South Korean Film Renaissance: Local Hitmakers, Global Provocateurs. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

9.

Gledhill, Christine. 2000. “Rethinking Genre.” In Reinventing Film Studies, edited by Christine Gledhill and Linda Williams. London: Arnold.

10.

Han, Seokjeong. 2009. “Manju weseuteon gwa naesyeoneollijeum ui gonggan” [The Manchurian Western and the Space of Nationalism]. Sahoe wa Yeoksa 84:5-30.

11.

Jeong, Myeonghwa. 2011. “Inteobyu: Mai Wei Gang Je-gyu gamdok, ‘Raieon ilbyeong guhagi’ wa chabyeoljeom hwaksil” [Interview: Director of May Way, Gang Je-gyu, Clarifying the Distinction from Saving Private Ryan]. Joynews 24, December 16. http://joynews.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_menu=701100&g_serial=625341.

12.

Jeon, Hyeonghwa. 2012. “CJ Mai Wei guhagi chongnyeokjeon” [CJ’s Flat-out Effort to Save My Way]. Starnews. January 4. http://star.mt.co.kr/stview.php?no=2012010411165809522&type=&SVEC.

13.

Jo, Hyeonggeun. 2009. “Bipan gwa guljeol, jeonhwa sok ui Hanguk singminji geundaeseongnon” [Criticism, Refraction and Transformation in the Discourse on Korean Colonial Modernity]. Yeoksa Hakbo 203:303-21.

14.

Kim, Gyeong-uk. 2002. Beulokbeoseuteo ui hwansang, Hanguk yeonghwa ui nareusisijeum [The Fantasy of Blockbusters, the Narcissism of Korean Cinema]. Seoul: Chaeksesang.

15.

Kim, Hongjung. 2009. Maeum ui sahoehak [The Sociology of the Mind]. Seoul: Munhak Dongne.

16.

Kim, Kyung Hyun. 2004. The Remasculinization of Korean Cinema. Durham: Duke University Press.

17.

Kim, Kyung Hyun. 2011. Virtual Hallyu: Korean Cinema of the Global Era. Durham: Duke University Press.

18.

Kim, Soyoung, ed. 2001. Hangukhyeong bulokbeoseuteo: Ateullantiseu hogeun Amerika [Korean Blockbuster: Atlantis or America]. Seoul: Hyeonsil Munhwa Yeongu.

19.

Kim, Soyoung. 2009. “Jijeonghakjeok pantaji wa sangsang ui gongdongche [Geopolitical Fantasy and Imagined Community]. In Asia yeonghwa ui gundaeseong gwa jijeonghakjeok mihak [Modernity and Geopolitical Aesthetics of Asian Cinema], edited by Kim Soyoung et al., 257-72. Seoul: Hyeonsil Munhwa Yeongu.

20.

Kwon, Eunseon. 2008. “Cheongyeon: Sinyeoseong jaehyeon eseoui minjokjuui wa peminiseum ui yeonghap” [Cheongyeon: Nationalism and Feminism in Collusion on the Representation of New Woman]. Yeongsang Yesul Yeongu 11:85-104.

21.

Lee, Seong-uk. 2004. “‘Uiri’ mani salgirida?” [‘Uiri’ is the Only Way to Live?]. In Chingu [Friend], edited by Yonsei Institute of Media Arts et. al., 12-27. Seoul: Samin.

22.

Lee, Sunjin. 2005. “Singminji gyeongheom gwa haebang jikhu ui yeonghwa mandeulgi” [Colonial Experience and Filmmaking in Post-Liberation Era]. Daejung Seosa Yeongu 14:107-43.

23.

Lee, Sunjin. 2010. “Hanguk jeonjaeng hu naengjeon ui nolli wa singminji gieok ui jaeguseong” [The Logic of the Cold War and Reconstitution of Colonial Memories after the Korean War]. Gieok gwa Jeonmang 23:70-105.

24.

Park, Yuhui. 2008. “Manju weseuteon yeongu” [A Study on Manchurian Western]. Daejung Seosa Yeongu 20:7-46.

The Review of Korean Studies