바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

Confucian Values and Democracy in South Korea

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2013, v.16 no.2, pp.151-178
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2013.16.2.006

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of cultural tradition on democracy in South Korea, with a particular focus on Confucian values. Confucian values comprise a positive attitude towards worldly affairs, a life-style of sustained discipline and self-cultivation, respect for authority, and familial collectivism. The data relies on a national survey conducted in 2000. Survey analyses served to provide empirical evidence that previous speculative debates lacked. The evidence shows that Confucian tradition exerts no effect on popular support for political democracy but has a negative impact on support for democracy in social relations. However, the authoritarian effect of Confucian values weakens in the presence of other social forces such as urbanization and Christianity. Protestant belief and growing up in an urban area diminish the negative effects of Confucianism. This suggests that Confucianism is adapted to new social trends and that the relationship between tradition and modernity is not one of antithesis, but of mutual accommodation.

keywords
Confucianism, democracy, political culture, democracy in social relations

Reference

1.

Ackerly, Brooke. 2005. “Is Liberalism the Only Way toward Democracy? Confucianism and Democracy.” Political Theory 33 (4): 547-76.

2.

Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

3.

Bak, Mina. 2000. “Dong-Asia yugyojeok gachi e daehan bigyo yeongu” [A comparative study on Confucian values in East Asia]. MA diss., Chonbuk National University.

4.

Beer, Samuel H., and Adam B. Ulam. 1958. Patterns of Government. New York: Random House.

5.

Bell, Daniel A. 1995. “Democracy in Confucian Societies: The Challenge of Justification.” In Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, edited by Daniel A. Bell, David Brown, Kanishka Jayasuriya, and David M. Jones, 17-40. Oxford: St. Martin’s Press.

6.

Bell, Daniel A. 2000. East Meets West: Human Rights and Democracy in East Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

7.

Bell, Daniel A. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

8.

Bell, Daniel A., David Brown, Kanishka Jayasuriya, and David M. Jones. 1995. Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia. Oxford: St. Martin’s Press.

9.

Bell, Daniel A., and Kanishka Jayasuriya. 1995. “Understanding Illiberal Democracy: A Framework.” In Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, edited by Daniel A. Bell, David Brown, Kanishka Jayasuriya, and David M. Jones, 1-16. Oxford: St. Martin’s Press.

10.

Berger, Peter L. 1988. “An East Asian Development Model?” In In Search of an East Asian Development Model, edited by Peter Berger and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, 3-11. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

11.

Bobbio, Norberto. 1989. Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

12.

Choe, Uyeong. 2004. “Hanguk jeontong sahoe ui gukga-sahoe gwangye wa gajokjuui ui giwon” [State-society relations and the origins of familism in traditional Korean society]. Unpublished paper presented at the Biannual Meeting of Korean Sociological Association, June 18. Daegu, South Korea.

13.

Chong, Terence. 2002. “Asian Values and Confucian Ethics: Malay Singaporeans’ Dilemma.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 32 (3): 394-406.

14.

Chua, Beng-huat. 1999. “‘Asian-Values’ Discourse and the Resurrection of the Social.” Positions 7 (2): 573-92.

15.

Cumings, Bruce. 1989. “The Abortive Abertura: South Korea in the Light of Latin American Experience.” New Left Review 173:5-32.

16.

Cumings, Bruce. 1997. Korea’s Place in the Sun: A Modern History. New York: Norton and Company.

17.

Cutright, Phillips. 1963. “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis.” American Sociological Review 28 (2): 253-64.

18.

Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

19.

De Bary, William T. 1998. Asian Values and Human Rights: A Confucian Communitarian Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

20.

Diamond, Larry, ed. 1994. Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner.

21.

Diamond, Larry, ed. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

22.

Donnelly, Jack. 1999. “Human Rights and Asian Values: A Defense of ‘Western’ Universalism.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, 60-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Eo, Suyeong. 1992. “Hangugin ui gachi byeonhwa wa minjuhwa” [Value change and democratization in South Korea]. Hanguk Jeongchi Hakhoebo 25 (2): 137-69.

24.

Fetzer Joel S. and J. Christopher Soper. 2007. “The Effect of Confucian Values on Support for Democracy and Human Rights in Taiwan.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 3 (1): 143-54.

25.

Fox, Russell A. 1997. “Confucian and Communitarian Responses to Liberal Democracy.” The Review of Politics 59:561-92.

26.

Fukuyama, Francis. 1995a. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.

27.

Fukuyama, Francis. 1995b. “Confucianism and Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 6 (2): 20-33.

28.

Gold, Thomas B. 1996. “Civil Society in Taiwan.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity, edited by Tu Wei-ming, 244-58. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

29.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

30.

Hahm, Chaibong. 1997. “The Confucian Political Discourse and the Politics of Reform in Korea.” Korea Journal 37 (4): 65-77.

31.

Hall, Stuart. 1993. “Encoding, Decoding.” In The Cultural Studies Reader, edited by Simon During, 90-103. London: Routledge.

32.

Hamilton, Gary G. 1994. “Civilizations and Organizations of Economies.” In Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg, 135-205. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33.

Han, Baeho, and Suyeong Eo. 1987. Hanguk jeongchi munhwa [Political culture of Korea]. Seoul: Beopmunsa.

34.

Han, Sangjin. 1988. Hanguk sahoe wa gwallyojeok gwonwijuui [Korean society and bureaucratic authoritarianism]. Seoul: Munhak gwa Jiseongsa.

35.

Helgesen, Geir. 1998. Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

36.

Hsiung, James C. 1985. “East Asia.” In Human Rights in East Asia: A Cultural Perspective, edited by James C. Hsiung, 3-30. New York: Paragon House.

37.

Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

38.

Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

39.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

40.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

41.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political References. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

42.

Inglehart, Ronald. 2000. “Culture and Democracy.” In Culture Matters, edited by Samuel Huntington and Lawrence Harrison, 80-97. New York: Basic Books.

43.

Inglehart, Ronald, and Wayne Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65: 19-51.

44.

Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2003. “Political Culture and Democracy.” Comparative Politics 36:61-79.

45.

Inoue, Tatsuo. 1999. “Liberal Democracy and Asian Orientalism.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, 27-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Jang, Iljo. 1977. “Gidokgyo wa gwonwijuui” [Christianity and authoritarianism]. Gidokgyo Sasang 21 (5): 66-75.

47.

Jeon, Jeguk. 1999. “‘Asiajeok gachi’ nonjaeang ui jaepyeongga: Minjujuui wa ingwon munje reul jungsim euro” [Re-evaluation of the dispute on ‘Asian values’]. Dong-Asia Bipyeong 2:43-59.

48.

Jeong, Byeong-eun and Uyeong Choe. 2006. “Hanguk jeongchi ui jeontong gwa hyeondae: Yugyoejeok geunbonjuui wa sahoe jabon ui gwanjeom eseo” [Tradition and modernity in Korean politics]. Unpublished paper presented at the Biannual Meeting of Korean Sociologial Association, June. Jeonju, South Korea.

49.

Kang, Jeong-in. 1997. “Yugyo minjujuui neun mosun inga?” [Is Confucian democracy an oxymoron?]. Jeontong gwa Hyeondae 2:362-81.

50.

Kausikan, Bilahari. 1998. “The ‘Asian Values’ Debate.” In Democracy in East Asia, edited by Larry Diamond and Marc F. Platter, 17-27. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

51.

Kihl, Young Whan (Gil Yeonghwan). 1994. “The Legacy of Confucian Culture and South Korean Politics and Economics.” Korea Journal 34 (3): 37-53.

52.

Kihl, Young Whan (Gil Yeonghwan). 2005. Transforming Korean Politics. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

53.

Kim, Boksun. 2005. Peminism mihak gwa bopyeonseong ui munje [Problems of feminist aesthetics and universality]. Seoul: Somyeong Chulpan.

54.

Kim, Choong Soon. 1992. The Culture of Korean Industry: An Ethnography of Poongsan Corporation. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

55.

Kim, Yeonghan. 1993. “Hanguk jeontong jonggyo sasang gwa gidokgyo sasang: Musok jonggyo reul jungsim euro” [Korean traditional religious ideas and Christianity]. Inmunhak Yeongu 23:275-316.

56.

Kim, Yung-Myung. 1997. “Asian Style Democracy: A Critique from East Asia.” Asian Survey 37:1119-34.

57.

King, Ambrose Y.C. 1996. “State Confucianism and Its Transformation: The Restructuring of the State-Society Relation in Taiwan.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity, edited by Tu Wei-ming, 265-76. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

58.

Koh, Byong-ik. 1996. “Confucianism in Contemporary Korea.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity, edited by Tu Wei-ming, 191-201. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

59.

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1989. “New Social Movement and the New Class in the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (5):1078-1116

60.

Laski, Harold J. 1937. “Democracy.” In vol. 5 of Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, 76-85. New York: Macmillan.

61.

Lee, Kuan Yew. 1998. The Singapore Story: Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew. Singapore: Times Editions.

62.

Lee, Teng-hui. 1999. “Confucian Democracy: Modernization, Culture, and the State in East Asia.” Harvard International Review 21 (4):16-19.

63.

Lingle, Christopher. 1996. Singapore’s Authoritarian Capitalism: Asian Values, Free Market Illusions, and Political Dependency. Fairfax, VA: The Locke Institute.

64.

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

65.

Moody, Peter R. 1996. “Asian Values.” Journal of International Affairs 50 (1): 66-93.

66.

Mun, Sang-hi. 1982. “Shamanism in Korea.” In Korean Thought, edited by Shin-yong Chun, 17-36. Seoul: Sisa Yeongeosa.

67.

Murthy, Viren. 2000. “The Democratic Potential of Confucian Minben Thought.” Asian Philosophy 10 (1): 33-47.

68.

Nosco, Peter. 2008. “Confucian Perspectives on Civil Society and Government.” In Confucian Political Ethics, edited by Daniel A. Bell, 20-45. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

69.

O’Donnell, Guillermo A., 1999. Counter Points: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

70.

O’Donnell, Guillermo A., and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

71.

O’Dwyer, Shaun. 2003. “Democracy and Confucian Values.” Philosophy East and West 53 (1): 39-63.

72.

Park, Chong-min, and Doh Chull Shin. 2006. “Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?” Asian Survey 46 (3): 341-61.

73.

Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

74.

Pye, Lucian W. 1985. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

75.

Pye, Lucian W. 1999. “The Asian Values Ballyhoo.” Foreign Affairs 77 (6): 135-41.

76.

Robinson, Michael E. 1986. “Nationalism and the Korean Tradition, 1896-1920: Iconoclasm, Reform, and National Identity.” Korean Studies 10: 35-53.

77.

Robinson, Michael E. 1991. “Perceptions of Confucianism in Twentieth-century Korea.” In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, edited by Gilbert Rozman, 204-25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

78.

Rozman, Gilbert. 1991. “Introduction.” In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, edited by Gilbert Rozman, 3-42. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

79.

Sen, Amartya. 1997. “Human Rights and Asian Values: What Lee Kuan Yew and Li Peng Don’t Understand about Asia.” New Republic, July14, 33-40.

80.

Sen, Amartya. 1999. “Human Rights and Economic Achievements.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, 88-99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

81.

Shils, Edward. 1996. “Reflections on the Civil Society and Civility in the Chinese Intellectual Tradition.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity, edited by Tu Wei-ming, 38-71. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

82.

Shin, Doh Chull. 1999. Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

83.

Shin, Doh Chull. 2012. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

84.

Sin, Gwang-yeong. 1999. Dong-Asia ui saneophwa wa minjuhwa [Industrialization and democratization in East Asia]. Seoul: Munhak gwa Jiseongsa.

85.

Tamney, Joseph B. 1996. The Struggle over Singpore’s Soul: Western Modernization and Asian Culture. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

86.

Thompson, E. P. 1966. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Random House.

87.

Tu, Wei-ming, ed. 1996. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

88.

Tu, Wei-ming, ed. 2000a. “Multiple Modernities: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Implications of East Asian Modernity.” In Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, edited by Samuel Huntington and Lawrence Harrison, 256-66. New York: Basic Books.

89.

Tu, Wei-ming, ed. 2000b. “Implications of the Rise of ‘Confucian’ East Asia.” Daedalus 129: 195-218.

90.

Wang, Zhengxu. 2008. Democratization in Confucian East Asia: Citizen Politics in China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.

91.

Weber, Max. 1951. The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. New York: Free Press.

92.

Weber, Max. 1981. General Economic History. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

93.

Yang, Jonghoe. 1999. “Confucianism, Institutional Change and Value Conflict in Korea.” Korean Social Science Journal 26:209-36.

94.

Yi, Jihun. 1993. Hanguk jeongchi munhwa wa jeongchi chamyeo [Political culture and political participation in South Korea]. Seoul: Hyeongseol.

95.

Yi, Seunghwan. 2004a. “Hanguk gajokjuui ui uimi wa giwon geurigo byeonhwa ganeungseong.” [The meaning and origin of family-ism in contemporary Korea and the potential for change]. Yugyo Sasang Munhwa Yeongu 20:45-66.

96.

Yi, Seunghwan. 2004b. Yugyo damnon ui jihyeonghak [A topography of Confucian discourse]. Seoul: Pureun Sup.

97.

Zakaria, Fareed. 1994. “Culture is Destiny: A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew.” Foreign Affairs 73 (2): 109-26.

The Review of Korean Studies