바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

The “Korea Problem”: Moritani Katsumi and the East Asian Community in Colonial Korea, 1931-1945

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2016, v.19 no.1, pp.41-73
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2016.19.1.002
Seok-Won Lee (Rhodes College)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Beginning in the late 1930s, the notion of the East Asian Community gained currency among Japanese intellectuals as Imperial Japan attempted to justify its invasion of China and colonization of its Asian neighbors. The East Asian Community was characterized by Japanese intellectuals’ new logic of an East Asian empire that incorporated Chinese and colonial subjects and was led by Japan. Moritani Katsumi was a converted Marxist social scientist who found the project of building an East Asian community feasible in colonial Korea. Involved in a wide range of academic and political activities in the late 1930s and early 1940s, Moritani called for imperial Japan to restructure the Korean economy, the agricultural sector in particular. His writings on Korea show one important facet of Japanese intellectuals’ wartime concepts of colony as he tried to change Korean society to a total-war- optimized one for imperial Japan in the name of economic development.

keywords
Moritani Katsumi, The East Asian Community, Korean agriculture, Asiatic mode of production, Naisenittairon

Reference

1.

A roundtable discussion. (1941), “Hanto no nōsonmondai wo kataru” [Discussing Agricultural Problems in the Korean Peninsula]. Ryokki 6 (2), 148-58.

2.

Bailey, Anne M., and Josep R. Llobera, eds. (1981), The Asiatic Mode of Production: Science and Politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

3.

Brook, Timothy, ed. (1989), The Asiatic Mode of Production in China. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

4.

Cha, Seung Ki. (2009), Pan’gŭndaejŏk sangsangnyŏk ŭi imgyedŭl: singminji Chosŏn tamnonjang esŏ ŭi chont’ong, segye, chuch’e [The Limits of Anti-modern Imagination: Tradition, World, and Subject in the Discursive Space of Colonial Korea]. Seoul: P’urŭn Yŏksa.

5.

Cho, Kwan Ja. (2007), Shokuminchi Chōsen, teikoku Nihon no bunka renkan [The Cultural Links between Colonial Korea and Imperial Japan]. Tōkyō: Yūshisha.

6.

Chosen sotokufu. (1940), The Official Gazette of the Governor General’s Office of Chosun Korea, no. 4177, December 23.

7.

Chosen sotokufu. (1945), The Official Gazette of the Governor General’s Office of Chosun Korea, no. 5502, June 5.

8.

Fogel, Joshua. (1988), “The Debates over the Asiatic Mode of Production in Soviet Russia, China, and Japan.” American Historical Review 93 (1), 56-79.

9.

Fukuda, Tokuzo. (1925), Keizaigaku zenshu 4 [Completed Works on Economics]. Tokyo: Kaizosha.

10.

Fukuritu, Shōji. (1935), “Wittofoguru hakase no nihon hōmon” [Dr Wittfogel’s Visit to Japan]. Shinagaku 8 (1), 133-41.

11.

Han, Jung Sun. (2005), “Rationalizing the Orient: The ‘East Asia Cooperative Community’ in Prewar Japan.” Monumenta Nipponica 60 (4), 481-513.

12.

Hirano, Yoshitarō. (1942), “Nanrei higashiind no tōchi-gyōsei no kihon seisaku” [Basic Policies on Governance and Administration in the Dutch East India Company]. Hōritujihō 14 (1), 26-34.

13.

Hirano, Yoshitarō. (1943), “Shina ni okeru kyōto no shakaiseikatu wo kiritsusuru minzoku dōtoku” [National Morality that Regulates the Social Cooperative Life of Chinese Village Communities]. Hōritujihō 15 (11), 7-14.

14.

Hirano, Yoshitarō. (1945), Dai ajia shugi no rekishiteki kiso [The Historical Foundation for Greater Asianism]. Tokyo: Nihonhyōronsha.

15.

Hirano, Yoshitarō, and Kiyono Kenji. (1942), Taiheyō no minzoku=seijigaku [Nations in the Pacific Ocean = Political Science]. Tokyo: Nihonhyōronsha.

16.

Hoston, Germaine. (1986), Marxiam and the Crisis of Development in Prewar Japan. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

17.

Husain, Iqbal., and Irfan Habib, eds. (2006), Karl Marx on India. New Delhi: Tulika Books.

18.

Ishii, Tomoaki. (2008), Karl bitfogeru no toyoteki shakairon [Karl Wittfogel’s Theory of Oriental Society]. Tokyo: Shakaihyoronsha.

19.

Iwata, Ryou. (1941), “Chōsen nōgyō saihenseini oite no kakusho” [Discourses on Agricultural Reconstruction in Colonial Korea]. Chōsen gyōsei 21 (8), 1-9.

20.

Jung, Jong Hyun. (2011), Tongyangnon kwa singminji Chosŏn munhak: chegukchŏk chuch’e rŭl hyanghan yongmang kwa punyŏl [Oriental Discourses and Colonial Korean Literature: Passion for Imperial Subjects and Division]. P’aju-si: Ch’angbi.

21.

Kim, In Soo. (2012), “Iron yonswe to junhwang—in Jeong sik ui kyungjeron ul chungsim uiro” [Theoretical Linkages and Conversion: A Study of In Jeong Sik’s Economic Theories]. Sahoe wa yoksa 96, 71-112.

22.

Koschman, J. Victor. (2006), “Constructing Destiny: Royama Masamichi and Asian Regionalism in Wartime Japan.” In Pan-Asianism in Modern Japanese History: Colonialism, Regionalism and Borders, edited by J. Victor Koschmann and Sven Saaler, 185-99. London: Routledge.

23.

Koyasu, Nobukuni. (2012), “Chūgoku ron wo yomu: showa (jihen=senso) ki ni okeru ‘Tōyōteki shakai’ no koso—moritani katsumi < Tōyōteki shakai no riron> wo yomu” [Reading Theories on China: the Structure of “Oriental Society” during the Showa Period—Reading Moritani Katsumi’s Theories of Oriental Society]. Gendai shiso 40 (6), 54-62.

24.

Lee, Chung Won. (1935), “Aziateki seisanyoshikiron to chosenhokenshakaishi” [The Asiatic Mode of Production and the Feudal History of Chosun]. Yuibutsuron kenkyu 31, 126-49.

25.

Lee, Seok-Won. (2014), “Empire and Social Science: Shinmei Masamichi and the East Asian Community in Interwar Japan.” Social Science Japan Journal 17 (1), 59-76.

26.

M. Fried, ed. (1968), Readings in Anthropology. 2 vols. New York: Crowell.

27.

Marx, Karl., and Frederick Engels. (1983), Collected Works. Vol. 39. New York:International Publishers.

28.

Moore, Aaron. (2013), “‘The Yalu River Era of Developing Asia’: Japanese Expertise, Colonial Power, and the Construction of Sup’ung Dam.”Journal of Asian Studies 72 (1), 115-39.

29.

Mori, Kojiro. (1935), Shakai seisaku yoron [Principles of Social Policy]. Tokyo:Nihonhyoronsha.

30.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1929), “Shakai minshushugi no minzoku riron danhen”[A Thought on Ethnic Theories in Social Democracy]. In Chosen keizai no kenkyū [Studies of Korean Economy], edited by Keijōteikokudaigaku hōbungakkai, 1-70. Tokyo: Tōkō shoin.

31.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1933a), “Kyūrai no chōsen nōgyō shakai ni tsuite no kenkyū no tameni” [Toward a Study on Traditional Agricultural Society in Chosun]. In Chōsen shakai keizaishi kenkyū [A Study on the Socio-Economic History of Chosun], edited by Keijōteikokudaigaku hōbungakkai, 397-482. Tokyo: Tōkō shoin.

32.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1933b), “Tōyōshakai ni kansuru hegeru to marukusu” [Hegel and Marx on Oriental Society]. Shakai 2 (1), 2-15.

33.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1934a), Shina shakai keizaishi [Socio-economic History of China]. Tokyo: Shōkasha.

34.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1934b), “Chōsen shakai to shizen kankyō (1)” [Natural Environment and Korean Society]. Tōa 7 (12), 43-51.

35.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1937), Ajiateki seisan yoshiki ron [On Asiatic Modes of Production]. Tokyo: Rikuseisha.

36.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1939a), “Tōa kyōdōtai no rinen to naisenittai” [Theories of the East Asian Community and Japan and Korea as One Body]. Ryokki 4 (8), 18-21.

37.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1939b), “Toyoron” [On the Orient]. Hitostubashi shibun, May 10.

38.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1940), “Shakai seisaku no atarashi hoko to chosen” [New Directions in Social Policy and Chosun]. Chosen shakai jigyo 18 (11), 14-19.

39.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1941), “Tōa kyōei keizairon” [Economic Theories of Co-prosperity in East Asia]. Chūōkōron 56 (10), 20-32.

40.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1942a), Tōyōteki seikatuken [Oriental Living Space]. Tokyo: Ikuseisha kōdōgaku.

41.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1942b), “Shakaiseisaku no honjitue no tankyu—josetu” [A Study on the Essence of Social Policy: An Introduction]. Keijōteikoku daigaku hōgakukai ronshū 13 (2), 47-61.

42.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1944a), “Shakaiseisaku no rekishi to kainen kosei” [The History of Social Policy and its Theoretical Structure]. Keijōteikoku daigaku hōgakukai ronshū 15 (2), 1-45.

43.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1944b), “Kōgyo richi gairon” [Theories of Industrial Location]. In Senjisangyōkeieikōwa [Lectures on Wartime Industrial Management], edited by Chōsen shōko kaigisho, 249-71. Kyungsung: Chōsen kōrōnsha.

44.

Moritani, Katsumi. (1965), Chukoku shakaikeizaishi: moritani katsumi ikoronbunshu [Socioeconomic History of China]. Kawasaki: Koyasu Michiko.

45.

Noh, Yongpil. (2010), “Moritani katsumi ui shikminjui sahoe kyengjesahak pipan” [Criticism on the Colonialism–supporting Socio-economic Historical-science of Katsumi Moritani]. Hankuksahaksahakbo 22, 217-53.

46.

Ōkochi, Kazuo. (1940), Senji shakai seisakuron [Theories of Wartime Social Policy]. Tokyo: Nihonhyoronsha.

47.

Pollock, Friedrich. (1932), Sovieto renpō keikaku keizai shiron. Translated by Moritani Katsumi. Tōkyō: Dōjinsha Shoten. Originally published as Die planwirtschaftlichen Versuche in der Sowjetunion, 1917-1927.

48.

Wittfogel, Karl. (1934), Kaitai katei ni aru shina no keizai to shakai. 2vols. Translated by Hirano Yoshitarō. Tokyo: Chūōkōronsha. Originally published as Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft Chinas; Versuch der wissenschaftlichen Analyse einer grossen asiatischen Agrargesellschaft.

49.

Wittfogel, Karl. (1935a), Shina keizaishi kenkyū [Studies of the Economic History of China]. Translated by Yorokawa Jirō. Tokyo: Sōbunkaku.

50.

Wittfogel, Karl. (1935b), Shina shakai no kagakuteki kenkyū [A Scientific Study on Chinese Society]. Translated by Hirano Yoshitaro. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

51.

Wittfogel, Karl. (1935c), “The Foundations and Stages of Chinese Economic History.” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 4, 1-60.

52.

Wittfogel, Karl. (1939), Toyoteki shakai no riron [Theories of Oriental Society]. Translated by Moritani. Tokyo: Nihonhyoronsha.

53.

Workman, Travis. (2013), “Seo In-sik’s Communism and the East Asian Community.” Positions: east asia cultures critique 21 (1), 133-60.

The Review of Korean Studies