바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

From a Lord to a Bureaucrat: The Change of Koryŏ King’s Status in the Korea-China Relations

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2016, v.19 no.2, pp.115-136
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2016.19.2.005

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This article examines the status of the Koryŏ king in the 10-14th centuries, in terms of the Korea-China relations, through a number of diplomatic systems and elements such as investiture titles, investiture documents, king’s clothing, seals, the tributary ceremony, etc. Through this, I tried to explain that Korea-China relations as well as international principles have changed from an aristocratic order to a bureaucratic order, and for the Koryŏ kings the critical point was when they were ordered to serve not only as Koryŏ kings but also as ministers of the branch secretariat in a Yüan provincial government. The changes that ensued can be felt in many other areas. In the early Koryŏ periods, diplomatic contacts were made between China’s emperor and the Koryŏ king, and Koryŏ king was invested, according to an aristocratic order. Yet during the Yüan imperial period, Koryŏ kings began to assume actual imperial posts, which added a layer upon their existing title of nobility. Koryŏ kings came to exchange diplomatic documents not only with the Yüan emperor, but also with imperial offices. And the following Koryŏ-Ming relations show the existing aristocratic order that had served as a defining factor for the Koryŏ king has disappeared, with only the bureaucratic system left to define the Koryŏ king in a new way. Ming emperor treated the Koryŏ and Chosŏn kings just as if they were part of the Ming order and realm. These changes are also reflective of the one which was going on inside China. The aristocratic order that had been the controlling hierarchy since the ancient times, changed gradually to a bureaucratic order. Such trend reached its height at the end of the 14th century, which was the early years of Ming.

keywords
Koryŏ king, aristocracy, bureaucracy, investiture, Korea-China relations, ministers of the branch secretariat, diplomatic document

Reference

1.

Danjo, Hiroshi. (2009), “Min-chō no taigai seisaku to higashi Ajia no kokusai chitsujo” 明朝の對外政策と東アジアの國際秩序—朝貢体制の構造的理解に向けて. Shirin 史林 92 (4), 635-69.

2.

Dardess, John W. (1983), Confucianism and Autocracy—Professional Elites in the Founding of the Ming Dynasty. Berkeley: University of California Press.

3.

Farmer, Edward L. (1995), Zhu Yüanzhang and Early Ming Legislation—The Reordering of Chinese Society Following the Era of Mongol Rule. Leiden:Brill.

4.

Iwai, Shigeki. (2005), “Min-dai Chugoku no reisei ha’ken shugi to higashi Ajia chitsujo” 明代中國の禮制覇權主義と東アジア秩序. Touyou Bunka 東洋文化 85, 121-60.

5.

Jung, Donghun. (2012), “Myeongdaeŭi ye’je’jilsŏesŏ Chosŏnguk’wang’ŭi wi’sang” 명대의 예제 질서에서 조선국왕의 위상. Yeoksa wa Hyŏnsil 역사와 현실 84, 251-92.

6.

Jung, Donghun. (2013), “Myeongdae Jeongi oiguk sasin’ŭi sinbun jŭngmyŏng bangsikgwa gug’ga’gan che’gyŏ” 明代 前期 外國 使臣의 身分 證明方式과 國家間 體系. Myŏngchŏngsa Yŏn’gu 明淸史硏究 40, 1-34.

7.

Jung, Donghun. (2015), “Koryŏ sidae sa’sin yŏngjŏp ŭiryŏŭi byŏn’dong’gwa gug’ga wising” 고려시대 사신 영접 의례의 변동과 국가 위상. Yeoksa wa Hyŏnsil 역사와 현실 98, 103-40.

8.

Jung, Donghun. (2016), “Koryŏ sidae oigyo’munseŏ yŏn’gu” 高麗時代 外交文書 硏究. PhD diss., Seoul National University.

9.

Kataoka, Kazutada. (2008), Chugoku Kan’in Seido Genkyu 中國官印制度硏究. Tokyo: Touhou Shouten 東方書店.

10.

Morihira, Masahiko. (2013), “Huma Korai kokuou no tanjo” 駙馬高麗國王の誕生 In Mongol Haken shitano Korai モンゴル覇權 下の高麗, 22-59. Nagoya: Nagoya Shup’pankai 名古屋出版會.

11.

Nishijima, Sadao. (2002), “Sa’kuhou taisei’to higashi Ajia se’kai”冊封體制と東アジア世界. In Nishijima Sadao Higashi Ajia Sironshu 3西島定生東アジア史論集 第三卷—東アジア世界と冊封體制, 95-107. Tokyo: Iwanami Shouten 岩波書店.

12.

Okumura, Shuji. (1984), “Si’sin kei’se’tsu gi’rei yori mita Korai no gai’ko si’sei”使臣迎接儀禮より見た高麗の外交姿勢 – 十一, 二世紀における對中關係の一面. Sikan 史觀 110, 27-42.

The Review of Korean Studies