open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 2092-738X
In this paper, I offer a reflection on two cases to assess in preliminary manner the viability of an indigenous methodology for Southeast Asian Studies. The first is Kaupapa Maori Research (hereafter KM) as spelt out in the much talked about book by Linda Tuhiwai Smith, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous People (Smith 1999). The second case is Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology, SP), which began to take shape in the late 1960’s and 1970’s in the Philippines. Arguably these are among the most developed efforts at decolonization or indigenization of methodology. I intend to use these cases to explore the factors that made possible the flourishing and stagnating of indigenous methodologies. I shall argue that the broader context of knowledge consumption, not epistemological and methodological concerns, poses the most formidable challenge to the viability of indigenization efforts.
Alatas, Farid. 1992. Some Problems of Indigenization. Working Papers No. 114. Singapore: Dept. of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
Alatas, Farid. 1999. The Discourse on Indigenisation: Definitions, Criteria, and Pitfalls. CAS Research Paper Series No. 17. Singapore:Published by Pagesetters Services PTE LTD for Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.
Alatas, Farid. 2006. Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Alatas, Hussein. 1972. “The Captive Mind in Development Studies.” International Social Science Journal 34 (1): 9–25.
Alatas, Hussein. 1977. Intellectuals in Developing Societies. London: Cass.
Alatas, Syed Farid. 2001. “Alternative Discourses in Southeast Asia.”Sari, 19: 49–67.
Alfred, Gerald Taiaiake. 1999. Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto. Don Mills, Ontario; New York: Oxford University Press.
Allwood, Carl Martin, and John W. Berry. 2006. “Origins and Development of Indigenous Psychologies: An International Analysis.” International Journal of Psychology 41 (4): 243–68.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.
Appadurai, Arjun. 2000. Globalization and Area Studies: The Future of a False Opposition. Amsterdam: Centre for Asian Studies Amsterdam.
Baker, David B. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology: Global Perspectives. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Bates, Robert. 1997. “Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?” PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (2): 166–69.
Bautista, Cynthia. 2000. “The Social Sciences in the Philippines:Reflections on Trends and Developments.” Philippine Studies 48 (2): 175–208.
Belgrave, Michael, Merata Kawharu, David V. Williams, and I. H. Kawharu, eds. 2005. Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives on the Treaty of Waitangi. South Melbourne, Vic.: Oxford University Press.
Bishop, R., and T. Glynn. 1992. “Ha Kanohi Kitea: Conducting and Evaluating Educational Research.” New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 27 (2): 125–35.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “The Scholastic Point of View.” Cultural Anthropology 5 (4): 380–91.
Burgess, Chris. 2004. “The Asian Studies 'Crisis': Putting Cultural Studies into Asian Studies and Asia into Cultural Studies.”The International Journal of Asian Studies 1 (1): 121–136.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Church, A. Timothy, and Marcia S. Katigbak. 2002. “Indigenization of Psychology in the Philippines.” International Journal of Psychology 37 (3): 129–48.
Covar, Prospero. 1991. “Pilipinohiya.” In Pilipinolohiya: Kasaysayan, Pilosopiya at Pananaliksik, edited by Violeta Bautista and Rogelia Pe-Pua. Mania: Kalikasan Press.
Enriquez, Virgilio. 1989. Indigenous Psychology and National Consciousness. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
Enriquez, Virgilio. 1992. From Colonial to Liberation Psychology. Quezon City:University of the Philippines Press.
Fabish, Rachael. n.d. “The Impact of Tā Te Māori Rangahau /Methodologies of Māori Research on My Work.” Te Kāhui Kura Māori 0 (2). accessed on 11 May 2016,.
Finlay, Len. 2000. “Always Indigenize! The Radical Humanities in the Postcolonial Canadian University.” ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature 31 (1 & 2): 307–26.
Goh, Beng Lan. 2010. “Southeast Asian Perspectives on Area Studies in a Global Age.” Jati: Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 15(Special Issue): 45–61.
Goh Beng Lan, ed. 2011. Decentring & Diversifying Southeast Asian Studies: Perspectives from the Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Hill, Elina. 2012. “A Critique of the Call to ‘Always Indigenize!’”Peninsula: A Journal of Relational Politics 2 (1), accessed on 15 May 2016, https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/peninsula/article/view/11513/3212.
Huotari, Mikko., Jürgen Rüland, and Judith. Schlehe, eds. 2014. Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hudson, Maui L, and Khyla Russell. 2009. “The Treaty of Waitangi and Research Ethics in Aotearoa.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1): 61–68.
Jackson, Peter A. 2003. “Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies.” Sojourn:Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 18 (1): 1–41.
Jahoda, Gustav. 2016. “On the Rise and Decline of ’Indigenous Psychology.” Culture & Psychology 22 (2): 169–81.
Kellner, Douglas. 2002. “Theorizing Globalization.”Sociological Theory 20 (3): 285-305.
Lett, J. 1990. “Emics and Etics: Notes on the Epistemology of Anthropology.” In Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider 74Debate. Frontiers of Anthropology, edited by T. Headland, K. Pike, and M. Harris. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications.
Macedo, Donaldo. 1999. “Decolonizing Indigenous Knowledge.” In What Is Indigenous Knowledge?: Voices from the Academy, edited by Ladislaus Semali and Joe L. Kincheloe. New York:Falmer Press.
Mahuika, Ragimarie. 2015. “Kaupapa Māori Theory Is Critical and Anticolonial.” In Kaupapa Rangahu: A Reader, edited by Leonie Pihama and Kim Southey, 34–45. Auckland: University of Auckland.
Mendoza, S. Lily. 2007. “Theoretical Avances in the Discourse of Indigenization.” In Mga Babasahin Sa Agham Panlipunang Pilipino: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pilipinolohiya, at Pantayong Pananaw, edited by Atoy Navarro and Lagbao-Bolante, 241–97. Quezon City: C & E Publications.
Mignolo, Walter. 2009. “Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom.” Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7–8): 159–81. .
Mignolo, Walter. 2011. “Epistemic Disobedience and the Decolonial Option: A Manifesto.” Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1 (2).
Mihesuah, Devon A. 1996. American Indians: Stereotypes & Realities. Atlanta, GA: Clarity.
Mihesuah, Devon A. 1998. Natives and Academics: Researching and Writing About American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Mihesuah, Devon A., and Angela Cavender. Wilson. 2004. Indigenizing the Academy: Transforming Scholarship and Empowering Communities. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Mohammed Halib, and Tim. Huxley. 1996. An Introduction to Southeast Asian Studies. London ; New York: Tauris Academic Studies.
Navarro, Atoy, and Flordeliza Lagbao-Bolante, eds. 2007. Mga Babasahin Sa Agham Panlipunang Pilipino: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pilipinolohiya, at Pantayong Pananaw. Quezon City:C & E Publications.
Navarro, Atoy, Mary Jane Rodriguez-Tatel, and Vic Villan. 1997. Pantayong Pananaw: Ugat at Kabuluhan: Pambungad Sa Pag-Aaral Ng Bagong Kasaysayan. Mandaluyong: Palimbagang Kalawakan.
Pe-Pua, Rogelia. 1982. Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, Metodo at Gamit (Filipino Psychology: Theory, Method and Application). Quezon City: Surian ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino.
Pe-Pua, Rogelia, and Elizabeth Protacio-Marcelino. 2000. “Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Filipino Psychology): A Legacy of Virgilio G. Enriquez.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 3 (1): 49–70.
Pihama, Leonie. 2015. “Kaupapa Māori Theory: Transforming Theory in Aotearoa.” In Kaupapa Rangahau: A Reader, 7–17. Auckland: University of Auckland.
Pihama, Leonie, Kaapua Smith, Mereana Taki, and Jenny Lee. 2004. A Literature Review on Kaupapa Maori and Maori Education Pedagogy. Auckland: University of Auckland.
Rodriguez-Tatel, Jane. 2015. “Philippine Stud ies/Araling Pilipino/Pilipinolohiya Sa Wikang Filipino: Pagpopook at Pagdadalumat Sa Loob Ng Kapantasang Pilipino (Philippine Stud ies/Araling Pilipino/ Pilipinolohiya in Filipino: Redefining Context and Concept within the Filipino Scholarly Tradition).” Humanities Diliman 12 (2): 110–79.
Rutland, Peter. 2001. “Remapping the World After the Crisis in Area Studies.” Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 10 (1):129–36.
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. London: Routledge And Kegan Paul.
Salazar, Zeus. 2000. “The Pantayo Perspective as a Discourse Towards Kabihasnan.” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science (Now Asian Journal of Social Science), 28 (1): 123–52.
Semali, Ladislaus, and Joe L. Kincheloe, eds. 1999. What Is Indigenous Knowledge?: Voices from the Academy. New York:Falmer Press.
Sinha, D. 1997. “Indigenizing Psychology.” In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and Method, edited by J. Berry, Y. Poortinga, and J. Pandey, 129–69. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London ; New York : Dunedin: Zed Books ; University of Otago Press ; distributed in the USA exclusively by St Martin’s Press.
Sta Maria, Madelene. 2000. “Indigenous Psychology, Ethnopsychology, Cross-Cultural Psychology and Cultural Psychology: Distinction Implications for Sikolohiyang Pilipino.” Asia Pacific Social Science Review 1 (1): 11–22.
Steedly, Mary. 1999. “The State of Culture Theory in the Anthropology of Southeast Asia.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 43–454.
Szanton, David L. 2004. “Introduction: The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States.” In Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by David L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press: 1–33.
Tiakiwai, Sarah-Jane. 2015. “Understanding and Doing Research - A Māori Position.” In Kaupapa Rangahau: A Reader, edited by Leonie Pihama and Kim Southey. Auckland: The University of Auckland.
Tolich, Martin. 2002. “Pakeha ‘Paralysis’: Cultural Safety for Those Researching the General Population of Aotearoa.” Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, no. 19: 164–78.
van Schendel, Willem. 2002. “Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance: Jumping Scale in Southeast Asia.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20 (6): 647–68.