바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2765-6934

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.6 No.1

Citation Share

Port Co-operations between Public and Private Sector

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2016, v.6 no.1, pp.13-17

(2016). Port Co-operations between Public and Private Sector. Asian Journal of Business Environment, 6(1), 13-17.

Abstract

Purpose – Purpose of paper is to clarify this PPP((Public Private Partnerships)’s essence and advantages as well as disadvantages, and then it will take it out some conclusions and implication together. To do so, PPP should be examined carefully and then landlord port will be investigated in view of PPP, then, it will give some implications whether or not PPP is successful to apply more port in concern. Research Design, data, and methodology – The methodology that I take is to look into both PPPs and then to look intp landlord port in view of PPP. By doing so, it can be more understandable to PPP in port industry. Results – It can be found that landlord port system is more valuable and applicable instrument to adapt for port competitiveness and productivity, which leads to efficient port management. Conclusions – Landlord port system is an alternative instrument to be apply to port management in terms of PPP, and it has been justified that many worldclass port has taken this landlord port management system.

keywords
PPP, Public, Private, Partnership, Port

Reference

1.

ADB (2000). Developing Best Practices For Promoting Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Ports. Manila, Philippine: Asian Development Bank.

2.

Aertsa, G., Grageb, T., Doomsc, M., & Haezendonckd, E. (2014). Public-Private Partnerships for the Provision of Port Infrastructure: An Explorative Multi-Actor Perspective on Critical Success Factors. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(3), 273–298.

3.

Baird, A. J. (2002). Privatization Trends at the World’s Top 100Container Ports. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(3), 271-284.

4.

Cullinane, K., & Ping, J. (2006). The Technical Efficiency of Container Ports: Comparing Data Development Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Transport Research Part A. 40(4), 354-374.

5.

ESCAP (2011). A Guidebook on Public –Private Partnership in Infrastructure. Bangkok: ESCAP, United Nations, Retrieved May 23, 2015 from http://www.unescap.org/ resources/ guidebook-public-private-partnership-infrastructure.

6.

Farrell, S. (2010). Observations on PPP Models in the Port Sectors. USAID, Retrieved June 3, 2015 from http://ppp-ukraine.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/PPPs%20-in-%20%20the-Port-Sector. pdf.

7.

Kim, Hong-Sep (2004), The Operation of Port marketing and Future Strategy Directions. Journal of Distribution Science, 2(1), 63-98.

8.

Kim, Jin-Hwan (2005). Studies on NODE as Competitive Power in International Logistics. Journal of Distribution Science, 3(1), 113-131.

9.

Kim, Jin-Hwan (2015). Lessons from British Port Privatisation. Journal of Distribution Science, 13(2), 5-13.

10.

Oh, Moon-Gap (2013), Practical approaches to becoming the logistics hub of Northeast Asia. Journal of Distribution Science, 11(6), 31-40.

11.

Panayidesa, P. M., Parolab, P., & Lamc, Siu Lee J. (2015). The Effect of Institutional Factors on Public–Private Partnership Success in Ports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 110–127.

12.

Sun, Il-Suk (2011). A Contemplation on Measures to Advance Logistics Centers. Journal of Distribution Science, 9(1), 17-27.

13.

van Herpen, G. W. E. B. (2002). Public Private Partnerships, The Advantages and Disadvantages Examinied (pp.1-13). European Transport Conference 2002. Association for European Transport.

14.

Worldbank (2015). A World Bank Resource for PPPs in Infrastructure. PPPIRC, Retrieved May 23, 2015 from http://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/sector/tra nsportation/ports.

Asian Journal of Business Environment

e-Submission OA Policy