바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Determinants of Bilateral Foreign Direct Investment Intra-ASEAN : Panel Gravity Model

Asian Journal of Business Environment / Asian Journal of Business Environment, (P)2765-6934; (E)2765-7027
2016, v.6 no.1, pp.19-24
Hasrat Ifolala Zebua (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Statistik, Jl. Otto Iskandardi)
Nasrudin (Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Statistik, Jl. Otto Iskandardi)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to find and analyze factors that determine the flows of bilateral foreign direct investment in intra- ASEAN. It specifically focuses on the dimension of macro- economic, natural resources, human resources, and the quality of governance. Research design, data, and methodology – Data were collected from 64 bilateral relations between ASEAN nations from 2002 to 2013. Panel gravity model was utilized to find factors that determine the flows of bilateral foreign direct investment. Results – Significant factors were identified that determine the flows of bilateral foreign direct investment: GDP home country, GDP host country, real interest rate, distance, and total natural resources rent. Unexpectedly, natural resources have a negative effect. Conclusions – In a situation of increasing the flow of FDI among the countries of ASEAN, the government should control the interest rates and maintain good relations with nearby countries. The negative effect of total natural resource rents implies that ASEAN countries should not depend on their natural resources to attract foreign investments.

keywords
Foreign Direct Investment, Intra-ASEAN, Panel Gravity Model.

Reference

1.

ASEAN (2015). Top Ten Sources of ASEAN Foreign Direct Investments Inflow. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.asean.org/storage/2015/09/Table-27.pdf

2.

Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundation and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 67(3), 474-481.

3.

Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics (5th ed). New York:McGraw-Hill.

4.

Jun, K., & Singh, H. (1995). Some New Evidence on Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1531.

5.

Kurniati, Y., Prasmuko, A., & Yanfitri. (2007). Determinan FDI (Faktor-faktor yang Menentukan Investasi Asing Langsung). Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

6.

Leff, H. N. (1964). Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8-14.

7.

Majeed, T. M., & Ahmad, E. (2008). Human Capital Development and FDI in Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 29(3), 79-104.

8.

Nawatmi, S. (2013). Corruption and Economic Growth: Empirical Study 33 Province in Indonesia (in bahasa). Dinamika Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Perbankan, 2(1), 12-23.

9.

Nunnenkamp, P., & Spatz, J. (2002). Determinants of FDI in developing countries:has globalization changed the rules of the game?. Switzerland: United Nations.

10.

OECD. (2008). Benchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment (Fourth Edition). OECD

11.

Panayotou, T. (2000). Globalization and Environment. CID Working Paper 53, Center for international Development at Harvard University Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

12.

Poelhekke, S., & Ploeg, F. V. D. (2010). Do Natural Resource Attract FDI? Evidence from non-stationary sector level data. De Nederlandssche Bank, DNB Working Paper, 266.

13.

Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2004). Ilmu Makroekonomi, Edisi Tujuh Belas, PT. Jakarta, Indonesia: Media Global Edukasi.

14.

Sukirno, S. (2006). Ekonomi Pembangunan: proses, masalah, dan dasra kebijakan. Jakarta: Kencana.

15.

Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures. IMF Staff Papers, 45(4), 559-594.

16.

UNCTAD. (2006). World Investment Report 2006. FDI from developing and Transition Economics: Implications for Development. 340. New York and Geneva: United Nations publication.

Asian Journal of Business Environment