바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

고분자 기반 코팅형 상아질 지각 과민 처치제의 효과에 대한 비교 연구

Comparison of high molecular coating type dentine hypersensitivity desensitizers

Abstract

ABSTRACT : Purpose : The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two commercially available desensitizing agents over 3 weeks on patients with dentin hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods : An oxalate-based solution, Sensblok ( NIBEC Inc. Seoul, Korea) & Superseal (Pheonix Inc. Michigan, USA), and a distilled water placebo were compared in a clinical setting. Seven volunteers exhibiting three or more teeth that were sensitive to tactile & air were enrolled in the study (35 teeth total). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for recording each patient’s level of sensitivity to tactile & air stimuli. A Florida probe was rubbed across the exposed dentin three times with a constant pressure 20 grams to measure the tactile stimulus. The air stimulus was generated by dental unit air syringe for 1-second blast from 1/2 inch distance. The desensitizing agents were applied according manufacture’s guideline. VAS scores were recorded at baseline, 1 minute after treatment, at 1 week, 2weeks, 3weeks. VAS score were analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA (α=0.05). Results : The Sensblok, Superseal, and distilled water placebo all decreased dentin sensitivity. A statistically significant difference existed between Sensblok and placebo when tactile stimulus was applied (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found among other desensitizing agents and tactile and air stimuli.

keywords
Dentine hypersensitivity, potassium oxalate, Topical desensitizing agent, Sensblok, Superseal

참고문헌

1.

1. Konstantian M, Arthur F.H., Philip M. P. Comparison of two topical treatments for dentine sensitivity. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006 Mar;14(1):38-41.

2.

2. Flávio L. P, Indrid G. R, Édina R. S. Effect of a 3% potassium oxalate topical application on dentinal hypersensitivity after subgingival scaling and root planing. J Periodontol. 2004 Nov;75(11):1461-4.

3.

3. Michael F. M., Richard D. D., Bruce W. R. Clinical efficacy of two dentin desensitizing agents. Am J Dent. 1999 Apr;12(2):72-6.

4.

4. Gillam DG, Coventry JF, Manning RH et al. Comparison of two desensitizing agents for the treatment of cervical dentine sensitivity. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1997 Feb;13(1):36-9.

5.

5. T. Pamir, H. Dalgar, B. Onal. Clinical evaluation of three desensitizing agents in relieving dentin hypersensitivity. Oper Dent. 2007 Nov- Dec;32(6):544-8.

6.

6. I. Duran, A. Sengun. The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Apr;31(4):351-6.

7.

7. Brämström M. The hydrodynamic theory of pain : sensation in preparation, caries, and the dentinal crack syndrome. J endodont 1986;12:453-457

8.

8. Pashley, D. H., Galloway, S. E. The effects of oxalate treatment on the smear layer of ground surfaces on human dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1985;30: 731

9.

9. Kim, S. Hypersensitivity teeth : Desensitization of pulpal sensory nerves. J Endo 1986;12:482

10.

10. Markowitz, K., Kim, S. The effects of various ionic solutions on pulpal nerve sensitivity. J Dent Res 1985;64(Special Issue):(A1213)309

11.

11. Shapiro WB, Kaslick RS, Chasens AI et al. Controlled clinical comparison between a strontium chloride and a sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste in diminishing root hypersensitivity. J Periodontol. 1970 Sep;41(9):523-5.

12.

12. Levin MP, Yearwood LL, Carpenter WN. The desensitizing effect of calcium hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide on hypersensitive dentin. Oral Surg 1973;35:741-746

13.

13. Thrash WJ, Dorman HL, Smith FD. A method to measure pain associated with hypersensitive dentin. J Periodontol 1980;51:535-540

logo