open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
In growing patients with Class III malocclusion and midfacial deficiency, the treatment protocol calls for orthopedic maxillary protraction and clinicians choose the facemask therapy generally. But facemask is not esthetic or comfortable to patients because it should be worn extraorally. Consequently it is difficult to obtain patients’ cooperation, and this often influences the treatment effects negatively. MTA (modified tandem appliance), that is a small intraoral appliance, is carried conveniently and esthetic relatively. So it seemed more patient-friendly than a facemask. While the treatment effect of this is similar to that of a facemask. This report presents skeletal Class III malocclusion two cases treated by MTA with good results.
1. Oppenheim A. A possibility for physiologic orthodontic movement, Am J Orthod 1944;30:345- 368.
2. Ngan P. Biomechanics of maxillary expansion and protraction in Class III patients, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:582-583.
3. Oh JW, Pyun BY, Choung JT et al. Epidemiological change of atopic dermatitis and food allery in school-aged children in Korea between 1995 and 2000, J Korean med Sci 2004;19:716-23.
4. Williams H, Robertson c, Stewart A et al. Worldwide variation in the prevalence of symptoms of atopic eczema in the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood, J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:125-38.
5. Chun YS, Jeong SG, Row J et al. A new appliance for orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion, J Clin Orthod 1999; 33: 705-711.
6. Klempner LS. Early orthopidic Class III treatment with a Modified Tandem Appliance, J Clin Orthod 2003; 37: 218-223.
7. Ellis E III, McNamara JA. Components of adult Class III malocclusion, J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:295-305.
8. Guyer EC, Ellis E III, McNamara JA et al. Components of Class III maloccusion in juveniles and adoescents, Angle Orthod 1986;56:7-30.
9. Campbell PM. The dilemma of class III treatment early or late, Angle Orthod 1983;53:175-191.
10. Joondeph DR. Early orthodontic treatment, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:199-200.
11. Ngan P. Early Timely Treatment of Class III malocclusion, Semin Orthod 2005;11:140-145.
12. Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB et al. Mandibular prognathism, Am J Orthod 1974;66:140-171.
13. Delaire J. Confection du masque orthopedique, Rev Stomat Paris 1971;72:579-584
14. 고정석, 김종철. 상악골 전방 견인이 상악골체의 변위에 미치는 영향, 대한치과교정학회지 1995;25:543-55.
15. 임중기, 박영철. 골격성 제III급 부정교합환자에서 상악골 전방견인장치 사용후 측모변화 대한 연구, 대한치과교정학회지 1995;25:374-401.
16. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean Children. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108:582-92.
17. Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N et al. Long term effects of chin cap theraphy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:127-33.
18. Ngan P, Yiu C, Hu A et al. Cephalometric and occusal changes following maxillry expansion and protraction, Eur J Orthod 1998;20:237-254.
19. Nartakki-Turley PE, Turley P. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion, Angle Orhod 1998;68:217-224.
20. AlTug Z, Arslan AD. A Mini-maxillary protractor for class III correction, J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:522 525.
21. 김병천, 문철현. 성장기 하악전돌 환자에서 TTBA를 이용한 교정치료 : 증례보고 대한치과의사협회지 2003;41(10):720-727.
22. 김혜진, 전윤식, 임원희. 한국인 성장기 III급 부정교합의 TTBA 치료 후 상악골 견인 효과, 대한치과교정학회지 2007;37(3):231~240.