open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
The demand for tooth-colored restorations has grown considerably during the last decade. Posterior composite restorations have risen in popularity as a result of the development of improved resin composites, bonding systems and operating techniques. A major limitation of direct composite restoration is the difficulty of controlling the polymerization shrinkage. To overcome this limitation, the indirect fabrication of a composite restoration and cementation with resin cement has been advocated. Unfortunately, the current available resin cements with indirect restorations do not always bond to dentin as strongly as dentin adhesive systems bond with direct resin composite restorations. Several procedural strategies have been proposed for indirect composite restoration. In this regard, the rationale for the indication, characteristics and clinical application is described in this paper. As a result, we will try to suggest the evidence-based guidelines for indirect composite restorations by reviewing each available indirect composite products, technical procedure and pronosis.
1. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132.
2. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881.
3. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18:256-265; discussion 266-257.
4. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-296.
5. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:433-442.
6. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The restoration of posterior teeth with composite Resin. 2: Indirect-placement composite. Dent Update 1997;24:25-30.
7. Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:495-503; quiz 504, 527.
8. Strassler HE. Esthetic posterior restorations: indirect composite resin inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 1992;4 Suppl:64-67.
9. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
10. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. How heat treatment and thermal cycling affect wear of composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:1467-1472.
11. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290-295.
12. Choi KK. Adhesion and Esthetic Restoration, 2009.
13. Shawkat ES, Shortall AC, Addison O, Palin WM. Oxygen inhibition and incremental layer bond strengths of resin composites. Dent Mater 2009;25:1338-1346.
14. Netto NG. Inlay & Onlay. 2nd ed: 대한나래출판사, 2011.
15. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. The influence of relative humidity on the effect of dentin bonding systems. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:123-127.
16. Cekic-Nagas I, Sukuroglu E, Canay S. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials? J Dent 2011;39:171-179.
17. Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:21-27.
18. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effect of silanization on bond strengths of fiber posts to various resin cements. Quintessence Int 2007;38:121-128.
19. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent Mater 2005;21:437- 444.
20. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006;22:752-758.
21. Chen LJ, Meng QF, Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Effect of fluoride iontophoresis on the microtensile bond strength between dentin and two adhesive systems. J Dent 2008;36:697-702.
22. Suh BI, Feng L, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:267-282.
23. Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemicalcured composites. Dent Mater 2001;17:542-556.
24. Lee JI, Park SH. The effect of three variables on shear bond strength when luting a resin inlay to dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:288-292.
25. Jang JH, Lee BN, Chang HS, Hwang YC, Oh WM, Hwang IN. Bonding efficacy of cured or uncured dentin adhesives in indirect resin. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2011;36:490-497.
26. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144-154; discussion 155.
27. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166-174.
28. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:105-113; discussion 113.
29. de Andrade OS, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. Dent Mater 2007;23:279-287.
30. Duarte S, Jr., de Freitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of totaletch and self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:1-9.
31. Rodrigues SA, Jr., Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:442-451.
32. De Kanter RJ, Creugers NH, Verzijden CW, Van't Hof MA. A five-year multi-practice clinical study on posterior resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res 1998;77:609-614.
33. Behr M, Hansmann M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:459-464.
34. Cho MW, Park SH, Kim JR, Choi KK. The bonding durability of resin cements. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2007;32:343-355.
35. de Menezes MJ, Arrais CA, Giannini M. Influence of light-activated and auto- and dual-polymerizing adhesive systems on bond strength of indirect composite resin to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:115-121.