바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

CAD/CAM 기술을 활용한 최신 교정치료 - 교정진단에서 간접부착술식까지

Current Orthodontic Treatment using CAD/CAM technology: from orthodontic diagnosis to indirect bonding procedure

초록

3차원 모형 스캐너가 빠르게 진화하면서 컴퓨터상에서 재현 가능한 디지털 치아모형이 교정치료에 적극적으로 활용되기 시작하였다. 최근에는 교정 치료결과를 미리 예측하고 치료의 효율성을 높이기 위한 다양한 3차원 진단법들과 함께 정확성과 신속성을 겸비한 구강내 스캐너가 개발되어 석고모형이 필요 없는치과진료가 현실화 되고 있다. IT기술을 접목한 디지털 모형기반의 소프트웨어와 로봇기술을 응용한 하드웨어의 개발로 디지털 치아 모형 셋업은 진단뿐 아니라 순측, 설측 간접 부착술식법에 응용되고 있다.

keywords
CAD/CAM dentistry, Indirect bonding, Virtual model

Abstract

Computerized 3D virtual dental models are currently available, and their use has started to improve treatment outcomes. Theaccuracy of digital models has been demonstrated by many studies and various intra-oral scanners are innovated for short scanningtime and high precision. Recently, a digital model was combined with a high technology computer-driven system, which wasdeveloped for the application of a digital set-up and indirect bonding of lingual attachments. In this section, virtual treatmentplanning using a virtual set-up program is be introduced, and the clinical applications and accuracy of computer-generated indirectbonding are discussed.

keywords
CAD/CAM dentistry, Indirect bonding, Virtual model

참고문헌

1.

1. Santoro, M., et al., Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003(124): p. 101-5.

2.

2. Redlich, M., et al., A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2008. 11(2): p. 90-5.

3.

3. Ender, A. and A. Mehl, Full arch scans:conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 14(1): p. 11-21.

4.

4. Ender, A. and A. Mehl, Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 109(2): p. 121-8.

5.

5. Baumgaertel, S., et al., Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009. 136(1): p. 19-25; discussion 25-8.

6.

6. Gamba, T.O., et al., Influence of cone-beam computed tomography image artifacts on the determination of dental arch measurements. Angle Orthod.

7.

7. Graber, Varnarsdall, and Vig, Integration Digital and Robotic Technologies. 5th ed. Orthodontics:Current Principles and Techniques. Vol. chapter 202010: Elsvier. 693p.

8.

8. Mah, J. and R. Sachdeva, Computer-assisted orthodontic treatment: the SureSmile process. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001. 120(1): p. 85-7.

9.

9. Grauer, D. and W.R. Proffit, Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011. 140: p. 433-43.

10.

10. Balut, N., et al., Variations in bracket placement in the preadjusted orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1992. 102(1): p. 62-7.

logo