바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 0376-4672

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

53권 11호

치과치료시 러버댐의 사용에 대한 환자의 인식도 조사

Patients’ perception on the use of rubber dam for dental treatment

염지완 (센텀타워치과의원)
곽상원 (부산대학교)
이효진 ((재)APEC 기후센터)
김현철 (부산대학교)
대한치과의사협회지 / The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, (P)0376-4672; (E)2713-7961
2015, v.53 no.11, pp.795-803
https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2015.53.11.004
염지완, 곽상원, 이효진, & 김현철. (2015). 치과치료시 러버댐의 사용에 대한 환자의 인식도 조사. 대한치과의사협회지, 53(11), 795-803, https://doi.org/10.22974/jkda.2015.53.11.004

Abstract

A questionnaire-based survey was done to evaluate the patients’ perception on the use of Rubber Dam (RD) for the tooth isolation during dental treatment. Total 106 questionnaire were gathered and the data were analyzed according to the patients’ gender, age, previous experience of RD. The 96% of total patients reported no experience of RD in their previous treatment. The first advantage of RD was selected as the protection of irrigant and medication into the oral cavity and the disadvantage was selected as saliva gathering during treatment. 98% of patients want to use RD for the next treatment and 99% remarked that the RD is essential for the dental treatment. Based on the surveyed data, majority of the patients highly satisfied with the RD use and they want to use RD and may consider the use of RD for the selection of dental clinic.

keywords
tooth isolation, rubber dam, perception, root canal treatment, satisfaction

참고문헌

1.

1. Elderton RJ. A modern approach to use of rubber dam. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1971; 21:187-193,226-232,267-273.

2.

2. Carrotte PV. Current practice in endodontics: 3. Access is success, and rubber dam is easy. Dental Update 2000; 27:436-440.

3.

3. Carrotte PV. Endodontics. Part 6. Rubber dam and access cavities. Br Dent J 2004; 197:527-534.

4.

4. Ingle JI, Walton RE, Malamed SF et al. Preparation for endodontic treatment. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, eds. Endodontics, 5th edn. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc, 2002; 394-403.

5.

5. Glickman GM, Pettiette MT. Preparation for treatment. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, Keiser K, eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 9th edn. St Louis, MO:Mosby, 2006; 120-132.

6.

6. Bhuva B, Chong BS, Patel S. Rubber dam in clinical practice. Endo: Endodontic Practice Today 2008; 2:131-141.

7.

7. American Association of Endodontists. Guide to Clinical Endodontics, 2004 4th edn. Chicago, IL:American Association of Endodontists.

8.

8. Cohen S. Endodontics and litigation: an American perspective. Int Dental J 1989; 39:13-16.

9.

9. Peters OA, Peters FC. Ethical principles and considerations in endodontic treatment. Endo:Endodontic Practice Today 2007; 1:101-108.

10.

10. Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 119:141-144.

11.

11. Forrest WR, Perez RS. The rubber dam as a surgical drape protection against AIDS and Hepatitis. Gen Dent 1989;37:236-237.

12.

12. Harrel SK, Molinari J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135:429-437.

13.

13. Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000; 33:435-441.

14.

14. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients’attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002; 35:812-819.

15.

15. Lynch CD, McConnell RJ. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Int Endod J 2007; 40:427-432.

16.

16. European Society of Endodontology. Consensus report of the European Society of endodontology on quality guidelines for endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1994 ; 27:115-124.

17.

17. European Society of Endodontology. Undergraduate curriculum guidelines for endodontology. Int Endod J 1992; 25:169-172.

18.

18. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39:921-930.

19.

19. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guidelines on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 2008?2009; 30:170-174.

20.

20. Smith GE, Richeson JS. Teaching of rubber dam technique in North America. Oper Dent 1981; 6 :124-127.

21.

21. Jones CM, Reid JS. Patient and operator attitudes toward rubber dam. ASDC J Dent Child 1988; 55:452-454.

22.

22. Gergely EJ. Rubber dam acceptance. Br Dent J 1989; 167:249-252.

23.

23. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32:389-398.

24.

24. Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. Int Endod J 2001; 34:16-22.

25.

25. Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J 2002; 35:759-767

26.

26. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, Aouar M, D'Hoore W. Retreatment or radiographic monitoring in endodontics. Int Endod J 1994 ; 27:75-81.

27.

27. Abbott PV. Factors associated with continuing pain in endodontics. Aust Dent J 1994; 39:157-161.

28.

28. Ryan W, O’Connel A. The attitudes of undergraduate dental students to the use of the rubber dam. J Ir Dent Assoc 2007; 53:87-91.

29.

29. Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PM. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. Int Endod J 2009; 42:632-638.

30.

30. Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: a review. Int Endod J 2009; 42:963-972.

31.

31. Ahmed MF, Elseed AI, lbrahim YE. Root canal treatment in general practice in Sudan. Int Endod J 2000; 33:316-319.

logo

논문 투고
OA 정책